849:"there are sources out there that cover the subject but they'r not adequate or independent". There was unanimous consensus then, there is thus far almost-unanimous consensus now. A second nomination (I see the labeled #2 was an error) should contain as a primary component of its argument the reason why the nominator thinks something has changes since the last go. Otherwise it just comes off as a form of jury-shopping.
848:
Clearly passes the notability guide as shown by the multiple reliable sources. LA Tiems and WaPo are solid. And perhaps I'm missing something regarding multiple nominations over time, but the rationale to nominate again seems spurious, as it is identical to the last one which was only 1.5 years ago,
228:
Blogger on youtube and the
Huffington Post. Everything here is related to that, or otherwise part of her publicity. There is not a single source here I would consider reliable--certainly not the Huff Post, where she's a contributor. Certainly not a student newspaper. Certainly not the 4-word listing
520:
This nomination is an exercise in absurdism - a couple of editors, having failed on multiple previous occasions to argue non-notability, apparently think that if they (repeatedly) try to gut the article they might just con people on the next go-around. This is not an appropriate use of AfD.
546:
While I agree with keeping, to be fair there was one user repeatedly removing things from the article, who has since been blocked. Neither of the two people advocating for deleting here have removed content from the article, nor did they participate in the previous AfD. —
253:. Being a blogger and/or a YouTuber is not relevant to whether someone is notable enough for a Knowledge article. What is relevant is whether there is sufficient coverage in reliable sources, and I believe Blaque meets that threshhold.
197:
353:
576:, I would request that you strike this statement. I've not participated in the prior AfDs and have not edited the article. My "Delete" vote was not based on any prior involvement with this page.
741:
95:
90:
806:
530:
706:. Clear pass of GNG from coverage in major sources such as the LA Times. Having all coverage being about the subject's vlogging/blogging activities is not a reason for deletion. —
327:
191:
761:
301:
150:
464:-- no significant achievements & Knowledge is not pop-trivia-pedia. Citations are to sources such as Gurl.com, etc. Not suitable for inclusion at this time.
275:
379:
556:
413:
157:
85:
429:
673:
255:
Is there a limit on how many times a page can be brought to AfD? She's hardly become less notable since the second nomination...
810:
417:
17:
123:
118:
858:
826:
793:
773:
753:
732:
715:
698:
677:
649:
628:
585:
512:
473:
456:
397:
371:
345:
319:
293:
266:
244:
68:
425:
127:
212:
526:
433:
179:
110:
55:
657:
per the above. If anything, the sourcing is better than at the time of the last AfD, which was a unanimous "keep".
802:
877:
822:
789:
574:
a couple of editors (...) (repeatedly) try to gut the article they might just con people on the next go-around...
64:
40:
711:
567:
541:
522:
669:
173:
453:
390:
364:
338:
312:
286:
873:
581:
469:
36:
834:
National coverage on her from major sources consistently enough makes her notable for a
Knowledge page
169:
818:
785:
728:
645:
60:
408:- passes GNG in my eyes but not by a whole lot. Nominator, however, appears to miscast the sources.
854:
707:
691:
549:
262:
205:
219:
839:
723:. The subject of this article is notable. Passes WP:GNG. Article is well cited by major sources.
660:
769:
749:
637:
624:
437:
385:
359:
333:
307:
281:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
872:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
814:
686:
577:
465:
421:
724:
641:
605:
483:
409:
114:
185:
850:
503:
258:
835:
616:
240:
765:
745:
620:
611:
489:
144:
257:
Strike that last bit, I now see that the second nomination was made in error.
106:
74:
809:, besides the Advocate and Independent, if you use tools you can access via
600:
494:
235:
866:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
354:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
689:
per the sources linked in both this and the previous AfD. —
481:
Now has material sourced from coverage in reliable sources
742:
list of
Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions
640:'s findings, there's quite a bit of coverage of her. --
140:
136:
132:
801:
Major newspaper coverage turns up in the likes of the
204:
424:. She's mentioned on a list of black changemakers by
96:Articles for deletion/Kat Blaque (3rd nomination)
91:Articles for deletion/Kat Blaque (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
880:). No further edits should be made to this page.
328:list of California-related deletion discussions
762:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
302:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
218:
8:
760:Note: This debate has been included in the
740:Note: This debate has been included in the
378:Note: This debate has been included in the
352:Note: This debate has been included in the
326:Note: This debate has been included in the
300:Note: This debate has been included in the
274:Note: This debate has been included in the
276:list of People-related deletion discussions
784:Passes GNG clearly as demonstrated above.
759:
739:
380:list of Women-related deletion discussions
377:
351:
325:
299:
273:
83:
573:
432:. Featured in an article from 2014 by
7:
412:has a whole article on her. As does
233:. The nearest is the MTV write-up.
81:
24:
813:. In an Admin, I find a lack of
86:Articles for deletion/Kat Blaque
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
428:. Her name is mentioned by
897:
842:) 17:40, 10 May 2017 (EST)
615:alone are enough to pass
869:Please do not modify it.
859:12:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
69:04:47, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
827:20:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
794:21:57, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
774:15:48, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
754:15:48, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
733:17:32, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
716:15:43, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
699:13:54, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
678:12:37, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
650:12:21, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
629:11:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
586:16:34, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
557:13:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
531:09:27, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
513:07:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
474:06:50, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
457:06:42, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
398:05:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
372:05:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
346:05:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
320:05:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
294:05:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
267:05:08, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
245:01:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
80:AfDs for this article:
811:The Knowledge Library
603:. The articles in
776:
756:
568:The Drover's Wife
542:The Drover's Wife
523:The Drover's Wife
400:
374:
348:
322:
296:
59:
56:non-admin closure
888:
871:
696:
694:
676:
667:
663:
571:
554:
552:
545:
510:
501:
450:
447:
444:
441:
395:
393:
388:
369:
367:
362:
343:
341:
336:
317:
315:
310:
291:
289:
284:
223:
222:
208:
160:
148:
130:
53:
34:
896:
895:
891:
890:
889:
887:
886:
885:
884:
878:deletion review
867:
819:Dennis Bratland
786:Megalibrarygirl
692:
690:
665:
659:
658:
606:The Independent
565:
550:
548:
539:
504:
495:
484:The Independent
448:
445:
442:
439:
414:The Independant
391:
386:
384:
365:
360:
358:
339:
334:
332:
313:
308:
306:
287:
282:
280:
165:
156:
121:
105:
102:
100:
78:
61:Spirit of Eagle
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
894:
892:
883:
882:
862:
861:
843:
829:
817:disturbing. --
796:
778:
777:
757:
736:
735:
718:
708:David Eppstein
701:
693:Rhododendrites
680:
652:
631:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
560:
559:
551:Rhododendrites
534:
533:
515:
476:
459:
402:
401:
375:
349:
323:
297:
270:
269:
226:
225:
162:
101:
99:
98:
93:
88:
82:
79:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
893:
881:
879:
875:
870:
864:
863:
860:
856:
852:
847:
844:
841:
837:
833:
830:
828:
824:
820:
816:
815:due diligence
812:
808:
804:
800:
797:
795:
791:
787:
783:
780:
779:
775:
771:
767:
763:
758:
755:
751:
747:
743:
738:
737:
734:
730:
726:
722:
719:
717:
713:
709:
705:
702:
700:
695:
688:
684:
681:
679:
675:
671:
666:Pigsonthewing
662:
656:
653:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
632:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
613:
608:
607:
602:
598:
595:
594:
587:
583:
579:
575:
569:
564:
563:
562:
561:
558:
553:
543:
538:
537:
536:
535:
532:
528:
524:
519:
516:
514:
511:
509:
508:
502:
500:
499:
492:
491:
486:
485:
480:
477:
475:
471:
467:
463:
460:
458:
455:
452:
451:
435:
431:
427:
423:
422:The Daily Dot
419:
415:
411:
407:
404:
403:
399:
396:
394:
389:
381:
376:
373:
370:
368:
363:
355:
350:
347:
344:
342:
337:
329:
324:
321:
318:
316:
311:
303:
298:
295:
292:
290:
285:
277:
272:
271:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
249:
248:
247:
246:
242:
238:
237:
232:
221:
217:
214:
211:
207:
203:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
171:
168:
167:Find sources:
163:
159:
155:
152:
146:
142:
138:
134:
129:
125:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
103:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
84:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
868:
865:
845:
831:
798:
781:
720:
703:
682:
674:Andy's edits
670:Talk to Andy
661:Andy Mabbett
654:
638:EvergreenFir
633:
612:The Advocate
610:
604:
596:
517:
506:
505:
497:
496:
490:The Advocate
488:
482:
478:
461:
438:
410:Advocate.com
405:
387:CAPTAIN RAJU
383:
361:CAPTAIN RAJU
357:
335:CAPTAIN RAJU
331:
309:CAPTAIN RAJU
305:
283:CAPTAIN RAJU
279:
254:
250:
234:
231:The Advocate
230:
227:
215:
209:
201:
194:
188:
182:
176:
166:
153:
49:
47:
31:
28:
599:Agree with
578:K.e.coffman
466:K.e.coffman
192:free images
725:Netherzone
642:ChiveFungi
107:Kat Blaque
75:Kat Blaque
874:talk page
851:ValarianB
766:• Gene93k
746:• Gene93k
687:WP:ANYBIO
685:- Passes
259:Funcrunch
37:talk page
876:or in a
836:TheGnerd
434:LA Times
426:NBC News
151:View log
39:or in a
636:As per
621:Edwardx
198:WP refs
186:scholar
124:protect
119:history
617:WP:GNG
572:, Re:
462:Delete
454:(talk)
418:Bustle
170:Google
128:delete
518:Keep.
430:Salon
241:talk
213:JSTOR
174:books
158:Stats
145:views
137:watch
133:links
16:<
855:talk
846:Keep
840:talk
832:Keep
823:talk
807:WaPo
805:and
799:Keep
790:talk
782:Keep
770:talk
750:talk
729:talk
721:Keep
712:talk
704:Keep
683:Keep
655:Keep
646:talk
634:Keep
625:talk
609:and
601:PamD
597:Keep
582:talk
527:talk
487:and
479:Keep
470:talk
420:and
416:and
406:Keep
263:talk
251:Keep
206:FENS
180:news
141:logs
115:talk
111:edit
65:talk
50:keep
803:LAT
697:\\
668:);
555:\\
498:Pam
449:Fir
446:een
443:rgr
440:Eve
392:(✉)
366:(✉)
340:(✉)
314:(✉)
288:(✉)
236:DGG
229:in
220:TWL
149:– (
52:.
857:)
825:)
792:)
772:)
764:.
752:)
744:.
731:)
714:)
672:;
648:)
627:)
619:.
584:)
529:)
493:.
472:)
436:.
382:.
356:.
330:.
304:.
278:.
265:)
243:)
200:)
143:|
139:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
117:|
113:|
67:)
853:(
838:(
821:(
788:(
768:(
748:(
727:(
710:(
664:(
644:(
623:(
580:(
570::
566:@
544::
540:@
525:(
507:D
468:(
261:(
239:(
224:)
216:·
210:·
202:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
177:·
172:(
164:(
161:)
154:·
147:)
109:(
63:(
58:)
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.