225:, which is strange for a regular fan of films and books that she on the surface appears to be. Note that the draft mentioned above is of a book that comes out tomorrow (Indian timezone), so it's weirdly timed if we are talking about a random fan, but speaks to the excellent project execution skills if we are talking about someone who is on the launch team. This raises concerns about whether there is a conflict of interest here. Funny that the user also claims that she
343:
are what is stated by the nominator. It's a mixed bag of unreliable sources such as blogs, or directory listings or references that don't even mention the subject and confirm nothing. This looks like a case of reference bombing to make the article look well-referenced when in fact it woefully
170:
123:
268:
164:
287:
213:
a hardly notable short story by an author who has a book coming up with the publisher of the subject of this nomination; and a draft of an article about
130:
227:"created more than 50 articles and always tried to write it in a neutral point of view, never intended to promote someone or something"
17:
61:
96:
91:
229:. I'm saying we should probably start taking defenses of obviously non-notable products by this person with a grain of salt. ––
100:
250:. Not her fault, most probably, just her job, and I've probably gotten her in trouble, right before a major release. Sorry. ––
185:
83:
152:
322:
384:
40:
361:
Not nearly enough coverage to establish significant notability. Could also be a COI issue with the article creator.
210:
146:
57:
246:
UPD: I've determined that the article author (Taniya94) runs a small sockpuppet ring. Evidence to be found
205:
which were not reliable or independent sources, no references were left to speak of. The article author,
142:
380:
365:
353:
329:
298:
279:
259:
238:
65:
36:
87:
217:
book from this publisher, with refs mostly taken from the
Facebook of the publisher and the author,
192:
178:
79:
71:
53:
291:
272:
255:
234:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
379:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
362:
158:
349:
206:
251:
230:
218:
117:
345:
311:
After release it has became one of the best-selling books of this era
223:
appears to be knowledgeable about the parent company of the publisher
321:
reviews (or even one-line mentions) in prominent
Bengali dailies.
373:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
203:
removing "references" (with explanations in edit summary)
340:
247:
226:
222:
202:
113:
109:
105:
177:
191:
339:- There references that were in the article as of
313:--How much were you paid to write this statement?!
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
387:). No further edits should be made to this page.
269:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
201:Non-notable collection of short stories; after
8:
286:Note: This debate has been included in the
267:Note: This debate has been included in the
288:list of India-related deletion discussions
285:
266:
310:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
366:21:27, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
354:11:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
330:06:34, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
299:23:35, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
280:23:34, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
260:23:00, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
239:22:31, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
66:16:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
404:
219:is currently in the works
376:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
317:notability.And almost
301:
282:
221:. This same user
211:has also defended
395:
378:
327:
296:
277:
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
403:
402:
398:
397:
396:
394:
393:
392:
391:
385:deletion review
374:
344:referenced. --
323:
292:
273:
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
401:
399:
390:
389:
369:
368:
356:
333:
332:
303:
302:
283:
264:
263:
262:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
400:
388:
386:
382:
377:
371:
370:
367:
364:
360:
357:
355:
351:
347:
342:
338:
335:
334:
331:
328:
326:
325:Winged Blades
320:
316:
312:
308:
305:
304:
300:
297:
295:
289:
284:
281:
278:
276:
270:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
62:contributions
59:
55:
54:Jo-Jo Eumerus
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
375:
372:
358:
341:this version
336:
324:
318:
314:
306:
294:CAPTAIN RAJU
293:
275:CAPTAIN RAJU
274:
214:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
80:Kathar Sanko
72:Kathar Sanko
49:
47:
31:
28:
363:Boomer Vial
165:free images
381:talk page
37:talk page
383:or in a
207:Taniya94
124:View log
39:or in a
252:Latreia
231:Latreia
215:another
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
359:Delete
337:Delete
307:Delete
143:Google
101:delete
50:delete
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
350:talk
346:Whpq
315:Zero
256:talk
248:here
235:talk
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
58:talk
319:nil
193:TWL
122:– (
352:)
309:--
290:.
271:.
258:)
237:)
209:,
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
60:,
52:.
348:(
254:(
233:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.