259:
her controversial role in selecting the Labour candidate for the 2000 London
Mayoral Election through denying individual votes to 50,000 co-operative party members (a large amount of coverage of this also). Finally her senior role at the Co-operative bank again adds to notability. I believe that this combined with everything else and coverage going back over a decade means Smith meets general notability criteria. We're not just looking at someone known for one thing either due to the voting controversy and I do take issue with the above use of the term "so called" as the incident was clearly controversial at the time (even significant concern in the Guardian!)
222:. The subject has been a candidate for Parliament and has service in local government but neither is an automatic foundation of notability. I detect no other reason for notability; her criminal conviction seems only to have merited attention because of her position as a Parliamentary candidate. Hence she is not notable.
312:. She's only 'notable' for the drink-driving (her political career wouldn't be enough for an article by itself), as that's the only context in which she's received significant coverage; but that's not enough grounds for notability by our standards. Keeping this article would, I believe, be a violation of
240:
caught drink driving but also crashed the vehicle whilst more than double the drink drive limit and was arrested. This notability is heightened by the timing of the event, occurring just days before the
General Election and as a result there has been significant coverage in multiple reliable sources.
258:
and sources seem to suggest the incident had a significant impact on the outcome of the contest. On top of this there's the lengthy legal process and change of plea etc. As others have said there is also Smith's lengthy career in local government/politics, with the main notable aspect of that being
239:
I started this article for several reasons. Firstly the conviction is notable (previous discussions have deemed drink driving convictions by politicians especially notable and worthy of their own category). When considering the conviction one has to consider the circumstances too - she was not just
268:
274:. Update, also worth noting that Smith was suspended by Labour for bringing the party into disrepute (they didn't even do this for some of those involved in the expenses scandal), and finally for anyone with a sense of humour there's also the issue of name of the road where the crash occurred --
363:
I've added some more sources for the London
Mayoral voting controversy as one of the Guardian links was missing. It even made one paper's review of the year, although being in 1999 there's obviously not quite as much material online as with more recent
165:
126:
455:
339:, viz. the drink-driving - and this is exactly what BLP1E is designed to cover. Unless evidence of notability for other events could be found, then this is inappropriate.
249:
429:
159:
204:
issues coupled with undue weight and a general limited notability I think the wikipedia and the world and the subject are better of without this BLP.
272:
335:
I can't see evidence of notability from the election thing, as the table given wouldn't be 'significant coverage'. Therefore, it does seem like
251:
One should consider that it wasn't just any seat being contested, but a key marginal, which had already received significant national coverage
62:
380:
17:
99:
94:
103:
86:
180:
413:
147:
564:
36:
200:
section and the drink driving section being bigger than her quite limited political notability, I think there are
563:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
141:
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
528:
376:
279:
264:
227:
520:
486:
401:
368:
549:
532:
511:
470:
444:
417:
356:
325:
300:
283:
231:
213:
137:
68:
504:
545:
209:
187:
540:- not notable as a politician, drink driving conviction does not make a non-notable person notable.
196:
Losing politician with a detailed drink driving conviction attached to it, what with the so called
393:
Classic, one-event made biography, made worse by the fact that the focus on the one event violates
241:
173:
52:
49:
266:
524:
372:
321:
275:
223:
90:
482:
336:
309:
270:
466:
440:
409:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
523:- Councillor = NN; failed Parliamentary candidate - NN; drunk driver = NN; Nothing notable.
541:
498:
296:
394:
313:
201:
153:
255:
205:
349:
252:
317:
82:
74:
462:
436:
405:
120:
291:
Seems to be of marginally confirmed notability independent of the drunk driving.
245:
243:
492:
292:
262:
260:
342:
247:
557:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
254:
in part due to the notability of the third placed candidate
116:
112:
108:
172:
186:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
567:). No further edits should be made to this page.
456:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
8:
430:list of England-related deletion discussions
450:
424:
454:: This debate has been included in the
428:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
337:someone known just for one event
1:
550:10:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
533:12:17, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
512:05:58, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
471:01:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
445:01:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
418:20:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
357:15:19, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
326:12:39, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
301:03:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
284:02:25, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
232:01:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
214:01:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
69:05:30, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
584:
560:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
308:- pretty clear case of
485:... does not meet
44:The result was
510:
473:
459:
447:
433:
421:
404:comment added by
385:
371:comment added by
355:
575:
562:
507:
501:
490:
481:Obvious case of
460:
434:
420:
398:
384:
365:
354:
352:
346:
340:
191:
190:
176:
124:
106:
65:
60:
55:
34:
583:
582:
578:
577:
576:
574:
573:
572:
571:
565:deletion review
558:
505:
499:
495:
399:
366:
350:
344:
341:
256:Anna Arrowsmith
133:
97:
81:
78:
63:
58:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
581:
579:
570:
569:
553:
552:
535:
514:
493:
475:
474:
448:
422:
387:
386:
360:
359:
329:
328:
303:
286:
234:
194:
193:
130:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
580:
568:
566:
561:
555:
554:
551:
548:
547:
543:
539:
536:
534:
530:
526:
525:Peterkingiron
522:
521:WP:POLITICIAN
518:
515:
513:
508:
502:
496:
488:
487:WP:NOTABILITY
484:
480:
477:
476:
472:
468:
464:
457:
453:
449:
446:
442:
438:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
396:
392:
389:
388:
382:
378:
374:
373:Shakehandsman
370:
362:
361:
358:
353:
348:
347:
338:
334:
331:
330:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
304:
302:
298:
294:
290:
287:
285:
281:
277:
276:Shakehandsman
273:
271:
269:
267:
265:
263:
261:
257:
253:
250:
248:
246:
244:
242:
238:
235:
233:
229:
225:
224:Sam Blacketer
221:
218:
217:
216:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:Kathryn Smith
80:
79:
76:
75:Kathryn Smith
73:
71:
70:
66:
61:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
559:
556:
544:
537:
516:
478:
451:
425:
400:— Preceding
390:
367:— Preceding
343:
332:
305:
288:
236:
219:
197:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
45:
43:
31:
28:
542:Warofdreams
489:standards.
198:controversy
160:free images
500:have a cup
206:Off2riorob
463:• Gene93k
437:• Gene93k
289:Weak keep
414:contribs
402:unsigned
381:contribs
369:unsigned
364:stories.
318:Robofish
310:WP:BLP1E
127:View log
406:Nwlaw63
166:WP refs
154:scholar
100:protect
95:history
50:King of
538:Delete
517:Delete
494:Coffee
479:Delete
395:WP:BLP
391:Delete
333:Delete
314:WP:BLP
306:Delete
293:Edison
220:Delete
202:WP:BLP
138:Google
104:delete
46:delete
506:essay
483:BLP1E
345:Chzz
181:JSTOR
142:books
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
546:talk
529:talk
519:see
467:talk
452:Note
441:talk
426:Note
410:talk
377:talk
322:talk
297:talk
280:talk
237:Keep
228:talk
210:talk
174:FENS
148:news
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
509://
503://
497://
461:--
435:--
397:.
188:TWL
125:– (
531:)
491:—
469:)
458:.
443:)
432:.
416:)
412:•
383:)
379:•
351:►
324:)
316:.
299:)
282:)
230:)
212:)
168:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
67:♠
48:.
527:(
465:(
439:(
408:(
375:(
320:(
295:(
278:(
226:(
208:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
123:)
85:(
64:♣
59:♦
54:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.