380:
have failed" and "Kathy was quite shy and wanted no part of the success and fame that awaited Simon" should be taken into account. I'm would surmise that the subject wouldn't really be happy with having the article - but probably doesn't have Jimbo's contact details or know that the article exists. At very least any unreferenced personal details must be removed, but I'll wait until the AfD is decided.
307:
398:
fans all over the world who at some point of their interest in Paul Simon's biography want to know a little more about the Kathy of 'Kathy's song' and 'America'. I think
Knowledge (XXG) should be a source for these people, and should care to write an article that respects Kathy's desire to shield her privacy. I think the present article does just that. A definite Keep.
261:
A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject. If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be needed to prove notability;
397:
She is a person who people know of, even though they have never met her, talked or listened to her, or seen her. Even though the information contained in the article about Kathy has been public for decades, no one is known to have contacted her or intruded her privacy. Yet Paul Simon has million of
379:
primarily because she contacted Jimbo to do so (and I will admit that it did have some (reliably sourced) tabloid-like negative aspects), I wonder if having (unreferenced) comments like "Kathy is a very private person; all attempts by the press to cajole information or her whereabouts out of Simon
305:
269:
I think we could put in a reliable source; there are also many other books about Simon which might provide enlightnment (and which I also don't have). Fundamentally you know, I don't like seeing an article which many wikieditors have worked on for nearly two years deleted.
264:
Now, if you type "Kathy Chitty" into Google you come up with lots of Paul Simon sites, all of which seem to verify what is written here, and which I would say counts as multiple independent sources. Furthermore, I think if anybody has a copy of
266:
168:
199:
Previously failed PROD. Unreferenced BLP for almost 2 years. Barely notable person, with very few personal details, at best should be a redirect to something a Paul Simon related page.
123:
376:
162:
351:
287:- Absolutely not a speedy situation here. Better get some footnotes on there, though. I found the article interesting and the subject inclusion-worthy.
309:. The content certainly seems worthwhile for inclusion somewhere. It's not clear to me, though, if the appropriate place is a separate article or at
128:
255:
fairly closely, it gives a lot of weight to the fact that there should be nothing contentious in a BLP, and I don't think there is here.
330:
There are apparently sources. . Simon is a significant enough artist that people who are the inspiration of his music can be notable
237:
17:
96:
91:
100:
183:
83:
150:
424:
36:
423:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
304:: Here are a couple of viewable books at Google Books that appear to verify much of the content of the article.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
144:
233:
225:
140:
410:
389:
366:
341:
322:
296:
279:
241:
208:
65:
190:
402:
375:
having recently been involved in a borderline notable (from a non-Australian viewpoint) person was
318:
176:
251:. Now, I know it's an unreferenced BLP, but that in itself is not a reason to delete. Having read
218:
406:
385:
275:
262:
trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.
229:
204:
256:
362:
292:
87:
58:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
252:
156:
314:
381:
337:
271:
200:
358:
288:
79:
71:
49:
117:
310:
332:
417:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
113:
109:
105:
175:
189:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
427:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
352:list of People-related deletion discussions
346:
350:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
48:. Those sources look sufficient.
1:
411:23:39, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
390:14:01, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
367:16:50, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
342:02:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
323:02:05, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
297:01:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
280:21:04, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
242:18:24, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
217:Unreference BLP, and fails
209:16:15, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
66:16:54, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
444:
420:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
369:
355:
245:
228:comment added by
435:
422:
356:
244:
222:
194:
193:
179:
131:
121:
103:
63:
56:
34:
443:
442:
438:
437:
436:
434:
433:
432:
431:
425:deletion review
418:
223:
136:
127:
94:
78:
75:
59:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
441:
439:
430:
429:
400:
399:
392:
370:
344:
325:
299:
282:
246:
197:
196:
133:
129:AfD statistics
74:
69:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
440:
428:
426:
421:
415:
414:
413:
412:
408:
404:
396:
393:
391:
387:
383:
378:
374:
371:
368:
364:
360:
353:
349:
345:
343:
339:
335:
334:
329:
326:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
306:
303:
300:
298:
294:
290:
286:
283:
281:
277:
273:
268:
263:
258:
254:
250:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
230:JeremyMcClean
227:
220:
216:
215:Speedy Delete
213:
212:
211:
210:
206:
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
64:
62:
57:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
419:
416:
401:
394:
372:
347:
331:
327:
301:
284:
260:
248:
214:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
80:Kathy Chitty
72:Kathy Chitty
60:
52:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
224:—Preceding
163:free images
311:Paul Simon
359:• Gene93k
315:Arxiloxos
267:this book
219:WP:ANYBIO
403:Mcouzijn
382:The-Pope
257:WP:BASIC
238:contribs
226:unsigned
201:The-Pope
124:View log
377:deleted
373:Comment
302:Comment
289:Carrite
285:Comment
169:WP refs
157:scholar
97:protect
92:history
253:WP:BLP
141:Google
101:delete
338:talk
272:Chris
259:says
184:JSTOR
145:books
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
407:talk
395:Keep
386:talk
363:talk
348:Note
328:Keep
319:talk
293:talk
276:talk
249:Keep
234:talk
205:talk
177:FENS
151:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
61:meru
46:keep
357:--
333:DGG
313:.--
221:.
191:TWL
126:•
122:– (
53:Shi
409:)
388:)
365:)
354:.
340:)
321:)
295:)
278:)
240:)
236:•
207:)
171:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
405:(
384:(
361:(
336:(
317:(
291:(
274:(
232:(
203:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
120:)
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.