413:. At the very least that makes it hard to make any judgement on the notability of the subject from the article content alone; my view from independent research is that the subject probably does meet notability guidelines but as the genre is not my scene I do not feel well qualified to offer an assessment. However, the real question I have is whether the COI editing warrants
409:. As the article has been nominated for deletion because of that, I feel obliged to comment. Not only was the article recently expanded by the subject's own staff in a not-entirely neutral way, it appears that was also created in the first place by an editor with a similar COI, having been done by an SPI named
594:
COI editing as such is not a reason for deletion and neither is autobiographical editing. What is a motif is undeclared paid editing which this is not. The article went through AFC and was cleaned up by some very experienced editors and was accepted as a draft submission by an administrator who has
417:
and, with no disrespect to the uninvolved editors who have also contributed, it probably is. I would wholeheartedly recommend delete-and-create-stub if I thought it would achieve anything, but the liklihood is the same paid editors would come back and place the same content anyway. So, in practice,
712:
Apologies if I'm misunderstanding your reasoning but it appears that there is nothing based on WP policy in the argument being advanced. We're not here to decide whether the subject is talented enough for an article, or even notable according to some standard we devise ourselves; the criteria for
405:. Apologies for the lame recommendation - the reason for it, and why I am commenting at all, will become apparent. This article originally came to the nominator's attention when I alerted administrators to the undisclosed paid editing which I saw taking place - details of which are at
665:
Yip, could be because Jazz and Blues are not as popular as they used to be, although there was a resurgance in Jazz about 10 year ago. That could be the reason that there not much coverage. But I think that three albums means she is an established artist and means she is notable.
467:
mix. The other 2 that are 404 links seem to be an events page to back up a claim to having played at a particular venue and a report on having been one of the winners of the newcomers prize. There are no reviews of her performances or recordings. For me it's not quite enough.
650:
Ok thanks for making that clear. I'm not sure the sources are enough to pass GNG there seems to only be 1 in-depth source and GNG requires multiple sources. The all about jazz is a press release about a performance by the subject. For me it's too weak.
362:
performances at the
Kennedy Center and the Vermont Jazz Center are indications of "having made it" in the Jazz space -- the article is written with sufficiently reliable sources for GNG. Additionally, the newcomer awards further reinforce the GNG case,
459:
as the prize is a newcomers prize which is excluded. As a singer there are claims of having performed at prestigous venues but when you scratch away they seem to have been as part of an emerging artists season notably at
Vermont
418:
cleaning it up and keeping an eye on it is probably all that can be done. I do recommend that if it is kept it is pared back to only the content which is or can be referenced and that what remains is reviewed for impartiality.
721:
lead to indicators of notability, such as awards or news coverage - but then, some awards and news coverage qualify and some don't, and we would still need to identify them here in order to make a convincing argument.
987:- quite a few of the sources suggested by Eddie Hugh are too focused on the actual album/song etc and fail to cover the actual subject, however there are certainly sufficient that do and thus this is a clear keep.
161:
298:
694:
Couldn't tell you unfortunately. But two different countries on two labels would indicate a sustained career. Third album as a duet. I don't see anything that is not good here, and it may be
814:
articles on here. Talent and creativity are the two primary drivers for the advancement of mankind. And the primary driver for this encyclopedia. Both are prerequisites for notability.
527:
Note: I have removed the G5 speedy deletion tag from the article because the user was not blocked or banned at the time they created it. Despite the username the article was created via
381:
The source that supports these claims throws back a 404 message. Were you able to look at it? Normally newcomer composer awards are not taken into account for notability as per
595:
since retired I believe. The article is a borderline case which IMHO doesn't quite make the grade but I don't believe it needs blowing up as it is not excessively promotional.
315:
114:
908:
Both French sources are more than enough on their own. Jazz magazine and Télérama are very reliable sources. I'm changing my !vote to keep following the above sources.
155:
926:
780:
406:
810:
That is the exactly reason we are here. If somebody doesn't have some facet of the psyche that makes them stand out from the crowd, then they we woudn't have
274:
having an article here equates to notability, or if - as it appears - CD Baby is a self-publishing site, it would appear that particular clause is
857:
847:. I was sceptical initially, but there's actually quite a lot of coverage out there now. Both of her albums as leader/co-leader were reviewed by
121:
414:
855:
886:, although that looks largely promotional, so might be best avoided. Including more from the other sources mentioned would be enough for
632:. Two albums out in the UK, seem to be one out in France, but she is notable. And there seems to be third album in the work as a Duo.
488:
I don't know why you didn't see about page creator user name. That name was for promotion but don't worried about this. I reported at
17:
884:
863:
87:
82:
91:
348:
176:
750:
461:
205:
143:
74:
1050:
40:
879:
1017:
881:
580:
508:
878:. There's also stuff in French on her tour there (maybe someone else can judge how good these and others are
866:
463:. The coverage is too weak to pass GNG. There seems to be only 1 in-depth source that is really a puff piece/
137:
934:
713:
inclusion are laid down for us and I'm pretty sure that neither being talented or having released albums on
788:
717:
label (no matter how many or how quickly) are accepted indicators of notability. Both of those things may
464:
197:
1046:
992:
975:
823:
727:
703:
671:
637:
536:
423:
283:
227:
133:
36:
1027:
996:
979:
962:
938:
917:
899:
887:
827:
792:
771:
731:
707:
689:
675:
660:
641:
604:
589:
540:
517:
477:
456:
445:
427:
393:
382:
372:
324:
307:
287:
253:
231:
213:
56:
970:
I don't think I need to comment. I created a large half page rationale, but I dont think wee need it.
876:
723:
555:
532:
419:
410:
279:
267:
1006:
913:
685:
656:
600:
569:
497:
473:
389:
249:
695:
441:
260:
Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels
895:
496:. Also, I don't see any reliable source about this artist. This AfD will be close soon. Thank you,
319:
302:
183:
169:
629:
561:
241:
201:
930:
560:
Well, but this article needs to delete because there is no significant source about this person.
340:
784:
344:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1045:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
988:
971:
958:
819:
699:
667:
633:
452:
368:
223:
78:
811:
625:
565:
528:
193:
909:
681:
652:
621:
596:
469:
385:
245:
493:
149:
873:
407:
Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Undisclosed paid editing at Kavita Shah
891:
762:
950:
851:(I've added the second one to the article). More generally, there are two reviews in
449:
335:
Due to aforesaid issues acknowledged and addressed as per edits and citations upon
53:
108:
954:
531:- but as the nominator said, "I've no idea as to how this was accepted at AfC".
364:
336:
70:
62:
263:
818:
Please leave the Afd open, until I can comment further, on Monday.
1041:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
680:
Are the albums on major labels or notable independent labels?
753:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
204:
guidelines. I've no idea as to how this was accepted at AfC.
455:
and as a composer she is not shown to have filled #4 of
299:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
698:, but two albums completed so quickly indicate talent.
564:
fails. She had just done two album. Is this enough for
489:
104:
100:
96:
168:
759:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
182:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1053:). No further edits should be made to this page.
925:Note: This discussion has been included in the
779:Note: This discussion has been included in the
314:Note: This discussion has been included in the
297:Note: This discussion has been included in the
440:(see my comments below) this may be a case of
316:list of New York-related deletion discussions
8:
927:list of Women-related deletion discussions
924:
781:list of Women-related deletion discussions
778:
313:
296:
868:. There's good biographical coverage at
258:(jumping in) Presumably alluding to #5:
444:. She doesn't quite scrape through #5
403:Neutral tending slightly towards delete
492:. And this article must to delete per
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
624::), no. I put the keep based on the
262:. The record labels are apparently
24:
192:No idea about how she passes our
1004:per the present circumstances.
415:blowing it up and starting over
1:
890:notability criteria 1 and 4.
883:). There's also a WNPR piece
194:general notability guidelines
628:standard, which superseeds
1070:
1043:Please do not modify it.
1028:14:34, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
997:12:53, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
980:11:03, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
963:21:04, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
939:06:21, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
918:21:12, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
900:11:15, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
828:09:37, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
793:04:21, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
772:20:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
732:09:45, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
708:23:19, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
690:12:04, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
676:11:20, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
661:14:48, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
642:13:53, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
605:09:21, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
590:07:59, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
541:06:53, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
518:05:54, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
478:15:29, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
428:18:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
394:18:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
373:14:32, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
325:10:02, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
308:10:02, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
288:18:29, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
254:18:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
232:07:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
214:06:46, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
57:19:20, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
953:singer and songwriter.
222:Two albums in Spotify.
816:Note to Closing Admin
240:Is that one of the
865:and in PopMatters
859:, a review in the
853:The New York Times
448:with just 1 album
1026:
1022:
941:
875:and Berkeleyside
795:
774:
770:
585:
513:
327:
310:
1061:
1024:
1020:
1015:
1005:
769:
767:
760:
758:
756:
754:
587:
583:
578:
559:
521:(moved to keep)
515:
511:
506:
322:
305:
268:Dot Time Records
211:
187:
186:
172:
124:
112:
94:
34:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1051:deletion review
1033:/noinclude: -->
1018:
1007:
775:
763:
761:
749:
747:
581:
570:
553:
509:
498:
355:May 2018 (UTC)
320:
303:
206:
129:
120:
85:
69:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1067:
1065:
1056:
1055:
1031:
1030:
1021:<Talk/: -->
999:
982:
965:
943:
942:
922:
921:
920:
910:Dom from Paris
903:
902:
861:Ottawa Citizen
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
797:
796:
757:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
734:
682:Dom from Paris
653:Dom from Paris
645:
644:
622:Dom from Paris
614:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
597:Dom from Paris
584:<Talk/: -->
546:
545:
544:
543:
512:<Talk/: -->
486:Speedy delete:
481:
480:
470:Dom from Paris
430:
399:
398:
397:
396:
386:Dom from Paris
376:
375:
353:
352:
329:
328:
311:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
246:Dom from Paris
235:
234:
196:or any of our
190:
189:
126:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1066:
1054:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1029:
1025:
1023:
1016:
1014:
1010:
1003:
1000:
998:
994:
990:
986:
983:
981:
977:
973:
969:
966:
964:
960:
956:
952:
948:
945:
944:
940:
936:
932:
931:Coolabahapple
928:
923:
919:
915:
911:
907:
906:
905:
904:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
882:
880:
877:
874:
871:
867:
864:
862:
858:
856:
854:
850:
846:
843:
842:
829:
825:
821:
817:
813:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
794:
790:
786:
782:
777:
776:
773:
768:
766:
755:
752:
733:
729:
725:
720:
716:
711:
710:
709:
705:
701:
697:
693:
692:
691:
687:
683:
679:
678:
677:
673:
669:
664:
663:
662:
658:
654:
649:
648:
647:
646:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
616:
615:
606:
602:
598:
593:
592:
591:
588:
586:
579:
577:
573:
567:
563:
557:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
520:
519:
516:
514:
507:
505:
501:
495:
491:
487:
479:
475:
471:
466:
462:
458:
454:
453:Naïve Records
450:
447:
443:
439:
436:
435:
431:
429:
425:
421:
416:
412:
408:
404:
401:
400:
395:
391:
387:
384:
380:
379:
378:
377:
374:
370:
366:
361:
358:
357:
356:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
330:
326:
323:
317:
312:
309:
306:
300:
295:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
256:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
238:
237:
236:
233:
229:
225:
221:
218:
217:
216:
215:
212:
210:
209:Winged Blades
203:
199:
195:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
123:
119:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1042:
1040:
1034:
1032:
1019:
1012:
1008:
1001:
984:
967:
946:
869:
860:
852:
848:
844:
815:
785:Innisfree987
764:
748:
718:
714:
617:
582:
575:
571:
510:
503:
499:
485:
483:
482:
437:
433:
432:
402:
359:
354:
351:) 19:48, 30
332:
275:
271:
259:
219:
208:
191:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
117:
49:
47:
31:
28:
1011:iddiqsazzad
989:Nosebagbear
972:scope_creep
888:WP:MUSICBIO
820:scope_creep
724:Dorsetonian
700:scope_creep
668:scope_creep
634:scope_creep
574:iddiqsazzad
568:article? -
556:Dorsetonian
533:Dorsetonian
502:iddiqsazzad
457:WP:COMPOSER
446:WP:MUSICBIO
434:Weak delete
420:Dorsetonian
411:Kavitamusic
383:WP:COMPOSER
337:Kavita Shah
280:Dorsetonian
224:scope_creep
156:free images
71:Kavita Shah
63:Kavita Shah
765:Sandstein
719:indirectly
696:WP:TOOSOON
442:WP:TOOSOON
360:Clear Keep
244:criteria?
1047:talk page
892:EddieHugh
872:magazine
630:WP:NMUSIC
562:WP:NMUSIC
465:interview
242:WP:NMUSIC
37:talk page
1049:or in a
849:DownBeat
751:Relisted
349:contribs
321:MT Train
304:MT Train
202:specific
115:View log
39:or in a
968:Comment
951:notable
870:Harvard
618:Comment
264:CD Baby
198:subject
162:WP refs
150:scholar
88:protect
83:history
54:Spartaz
955:gidonb
812:WP:BIO
626:WP:GNG
566:WP:BLP
529:WP:AFC
365:Sadads
341:Woojy4
134:Google
92:delete
949:this
494:WP:G5
278:met.
177:JSTOR
138:books
122:Stats
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
1002:Keep
993:talk
985:Keep
976:talk
959:talk
947:Keep
935:talk
914:talk
896:talk
845:Keep
824:talk
789:talk
728:talk
704:talk
686:talk
672:talk
657:talk
638:talk
601:talk
537:talk
474:talk
438:Keep
424:talk
390:talk
369:talk
345:talk
333:Keep
284:talk
266:and
250:talk
228:talk
220:Keep
170:FENS
144:news
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
50:keep
1013:001
715:any
620:Hi
576:001
504:001
490:UAA
451:on
276:not
184:TWL
113:– (
995:)
978:)
961:)
937:)
929:.
916:)
898:)
826:)
791:)
783:.
730:)
706:)
688:)
674:)
659:)
640:)
603:)
539:)
476:)
426:)
392:)
371:)
347:•
339:.
318:.
301:.
286:)
272:If
270:.
252:)
230:)
207:~
164:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
52:.
1035:·
1009:S
991:(
974:(
957:(
933:(
912:(
894:(
822:(
787:(
726:(
702:(
684:(
670:(
655:(
636:(
599:(
572:S
558::
554:@
535:(
500:S
484:*
472:(
422:(
388:(
367:(
343:(
282:(
248:(
226:(
200:-
188:)
180:·
174:·
166:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
136:(
128:(
125:)
118:·
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.