262:
withdraw them for the present(only from the article). Now that I am ready to remove the objectionable material (which was very wisely communicated to me and has, in fact, been removed or reformed), how do you propose the page to be addressed as being biased? ‘Vandalism’ as you call it, is not my intention, nor can I be charged with it-if the case be discussed on basis of tangible proofs (of course, prejudices can’t be reasoned with). About My name being so frequent in the list of updates: It’s only a further proof of my readiness to acknowledge any information which I provide and be responsible for it, I say this on my Honour that doing good is my only intention in providing everyone with such an amount of information; I have reasons for every word I add. If I were bent on doing a mischief, I could have done it using a thousand false names(Internet is a beautiful medium for the shrewd and the unworthy!), if only my conscience would have allowed me to(and it won’t). As far as updates are concerned, you don’t like my doing it, do it yourself, update it with such information as I have done, with so much study as my good fortune has been to accomplish. I have nothing more to add.
261:
Why is such a dispute, over an article which provides you with such an enormous amount of information, exisiting? I agree, opinions were expressed in the article and those were with solid bases, more solid than those on which many a popular truths exist today. Yet you protest, fine, I am ready to
118:
183:- There seems to be an edit war going on over this article at present. I can't see any reason to delete the article, but it does need serious attention.
227:
147:
231:
17:
55:
249:- The nominator did not give a single reason as to why the article should be deleted so I don't believe it should be deleted.
91:
86:
329:
36:
95:
224:- No need to delete the article. Things are sometimes debatable, but deletion is no solution. Please do not delete.
192:
78:
328:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
235:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
185:
302:
165:
264:
143:
290:
153:
52:
312:
267:
253:
239:
216:
204:
175:
130:
60:
212:- No reason or rationale is given for deletion, either here or on the talk page. Retain it. -
127:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
284:
200:
283:, you mean? BTW, if you want to "do it under a thousand false names", all that'll happen is
213:
49:
82:
112:
250:
74:
66:
322:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
280:
139:
108:
104:
100:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
150:. Did the nominator not look at the edit history?
332:). No further edits should be made to this page.
48:. Nominator did not give a reason for deletion.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
349:
61:06:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
313:16:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
268:16:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
254:08:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
240:09:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
217:23:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
205:18:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
176:18:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
131:17:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
126:Highly biased treatment.
325:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
285:your IP getting blocked
144:User:Nikhil Srivastava
230:comment was added by
279:- "tangible proofs"
148:repeated vandalism
309:
265:Nikhil Srivastava
243:
202:
172:
58:
340:
327:
311:
308:
303:
300:
295:
225:
203:
199:
197:
190:
174:
171:
166:
163:
158:
116:
98:
56:
34:
348:
347:
343:
342:
341:
339:
338:
337:
336:
330:deletion review
323:
304:
296:
291:
288:
226:—The preceding
193:
186:
184:
167:
159:
154:
151:
89:
73:
70:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
346:
344:
335:
334:
318:
317:
316:
315:
271:
270:
263:
256:
244:
232:203.122.11.131
219:
207:
178:
133:
123:
122:
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
345:
333:
331:
326:
320:
319:
314:
310:
307:
306:(talk to me!)
301:
299:
294:
286:
282:
281:like this one
278:
275:
274:
273:
272:
269:
266:
260:
257:
255:
252:
248:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
223:
220:
218:
215:
211:
208:
206:
201:
198:
196:
191:
189:
182:
179:
177:
173:
170:
169:(talk to me!)
164:
162:
157:
149:
145:
141:
137:
134:
132:
129:
128:Randy_LeJeune
125:
124:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
53:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
324:
321:
305:
297:
292:
276:
258:
246:
221:
209:
194:
187:
180:
168:
160:
155:
142:, and block
140:this version
135:
45:
43:
31:
28:
214:Rapscallion
50:Cúchullain
228:unsigned
119:View log
75:Kayastha
67:Kayastha
277:Comment
259:Amazed!
247:Comment
222:Comment
210:Comment
181:Comment
92:protect
87:history
293:irides
251:Raj712
156:irides
136:Revert
96:delete
298:centi
161:centi
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
236:talk
146:for
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
46:Keep
289:-
195:ton
188:Wal
152:-
138:to
117:– (
238:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
287:.
242:.
234:(
121:)
115:)
77:(
57:c
54:/
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.