670:
666:
470:, but there are many other biographical articles whose notability is not questioned, even though they discuss people who are only really notable for one thing that happened to them - in many cases, sadly, how they died. (The majority of articles in come to mind.) The fact is that extensive media coverage of a particular incident
419:
The
Japanese article not citing sources is not a reason for deletion from English Knowledge, as Japanese Knowledge apparently has different standards for sourcing and referencing. (One example would be , which cites only two sources, one for another name for Japanese literature and the other for a
642:
is still up in the air, but I say keep because of the precedent set in other independent articles devoted to people who are only notable for having been tragically killed in a particular fashion and those incidents having been covered in the media. The difference is that this person was killed as
318:
Added another printed source to the article, multi-page article in a book printed in 1996 discussing Kazuo Nagano and his crimes. Knowledge is a source of knowledge. I think that this subject is notable enough, with at a simple minimum of two sources that appeared in print, and most likely many
292:
Uppity? As in "you should stay down there" that you say to an inferior? None the less, I forgot that I made this article (2007 is a long way down the hole) so I suppose I shouldn't argue for it too strongly. None the less, if a time magazine source and a news video source is not enough, what is
253:
Calling it uncivil is an attempt to make it so. I said it more as a statement of fact. By saying that no one knows this person, you were showing your own bias. So you are being ethnocentric. Fact. Not meant as a personal attack on your integrity as an individual of course. This guy was
674:
426:. I say weak keep in spite of all the reliable sources because it is essentially one old news story, but the existence of all this material seems to indicate that it was a in Japan (sometime before I was born, so I don't remember).
165:
258:
and it is notable. It was in the news. Don't be dogmatic, please. I know that people usually stick to their guns on
Knowledge though, so I don't imagine you being open minded about this. Cheers,
396:
118:
159:
376:
356:
272:
It's not a statement of fact at all, it's you getting uppity at the fact somebody has questioned the notability of an article you created. You also need to
421:
444:
The problem is: do these sources constitute in-depth coverage of Kazuo Nagano to justify a biographical article on
Knowledge? I don't think so. --
125:
235:
As stated in my nom, the
Japanese-language article is entirely unsourced, and this one is barely. There is no evidence this individual meets
196:
Contested PROD - no evidence of notability, Japanese-language article is entirely unreferenced. At most, this could perhaps be merged into
643:
revenge for having swindled thousands of people out of a huge amount of money, and was already an infamous robber known throughout Japan
624:
in the article in both
English and Japanese. This person and the scandal he was at the heart of, and what happened to him, have received
319:
others. I ask you to seek knowledge in order to add and create. A thirst for deleting valid content will serve none of us well. Cheers,
638:). Whether Knowledge policy justifies the article as it is currently titled, rather than as a section in a theoretical article on the
568:
547:
572:
91:
86:
673:
brings up over 1,000. Most appear to be general works on unsolved crimes, unusual assassinations, media malpractice, etc., but
529:
420:
dispute over the usage of that name.) A quick
Googling revealed that the Heuston Chronicle covered this story when it happened
95:
17:
474:
merits at least one article on it. I said "weak" keep because I would not be opposed to creating an article about the larger
180:
78:
147:
467:
620:
I need to add this for the record: the argument for deletion seems to have been based solely on the lack of sources
709:
40:
239:. PS your accusations of ethnocentrism are entirely unfounded and violate civility guidelines - please strike.
141:
293:
enough? I am sorry if I sound abrasive, I am just frustrated by those that seek to delete instead of create.
686:
652:
491:
431:
584:, the above SPA account appear to have as main purpose voting delete in almost all the Japan-related AfDs.
639:
284:
243:
204:
197:
475:
137:
705:
690:
656:
612:
593:
564:
555:
551:
534:
495:
453:
435:
408:
388:
368:
347:
328:
302:
287:
267:
246:
227:
207:
60:
36:
560:
187:
621:
589:
525:
483:
479:
173:
478:(or some other appropriate, preferably attestible, transation), and merging this content into it.
682:
648:
487:
427:
338:. Chairman of a non-notable company. Only gained momentary media attention for a single event. --
404:
384:
364:
281:
240:
201:
82:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
704:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
608:
509:
423:, as did the Japan Times, which has the article displayed in a retrospective on its website
324:
298:
263:
223:
634:
153:
585:
521:
449:
343:
678:
424:
236:
400:
380:
360:
277:
74:
66:
54:
112:
216:
604:
320:
294:
273:
259:
219:
255:
512:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
445:
339:
215:- what? Calling this non-notable is ethnocentric. Well know in these parts
632:
lack of recent sources in
English is not a valid case for deletion (see
218:
and has sources besides. Not sure why this article was tagged? Cheers,
698:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
486:
Wikipedias both currently have such articles, it seems.
108:
104:
100:
172:
519:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
397:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
712:). No further edits should be made to this page.
280:. An unusual death does not confer notability.
200:, but does not deserve a standalone article.
186:
8:
395:Note: This debate has been included in the
375:Note: This debate has been included in the
355:Note: This debate has been included in the
665:Recently learned how to use Google Books.
394:
377:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
374:
357:list of Japan-related deletion discussions
354:
677:was the records of transactions of the
603:- per reliable sources. and WP:GNG.--
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
256:killed in front of the public
691:05:29, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
657:04:54, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
613:17:10, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
594:08:46, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
556:07:36, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
546:- Weak case for notability.
535:00:48, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
496:05:30, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
468:Knowledge:Other stuff exists
454:02:58, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
436:01:09, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
409:01:26, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
389:01:26, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
369:01:26, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
348:01:20, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
329:10:30, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
303:10:08, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
288:07:57, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
268:07:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
247:16:20, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
228:16:18, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
208:10:34, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
61:00:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
729:
667:"Kazuo Nagano" in English
466:I know it's kind of like
701:Please do not modify it.
669:brings up 222 hits, and
32:Please do not modify it.
628:media coverage, and a
198:List of unusual deaths
675:at least one of those
573:few or no other edits
276:the notability using
640:Toyota Shōji scandal
575:outside this topic.
476:Toyota Shōji Affair
671:"永野一男" in Japanese
618:Additional comment
48:The result was
576:
537:
411:
391:
371:
720:
703:
558:
533:
518:
514:
278:reliable sources
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
57:
34:
728:
727:
723:
722:
721:
719:
718:
717:
716:
710:deletion review
699:
647:he was killed.
622:currently cited
520:
507:
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
55:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
726:
724:
715:
714:
695:
694:
693:
660:
659:
615:
597:
596:
578:
577:
540:
539:
538:
516:
515:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
459:
458:
457:
456:
439:
438:
413:
412:
392:
372:
351:
350:
332:
331:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
250:
249:
194:
193:
130:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
725:
713:
711:
707:
702:
696:
692:
688:
684:
683:elvenscout742
680:
679:Diet of Japan
676:
672:
668:
664:
663:
662:
661:
658:
654:
650:
649:elvenscout742
646:
641:
637:
636:
631:
627:
623:
619:
616:
614:
610:
606:
602:
599:
598:
595:
591:
587:
583:
580:
579:
574:
570:
566:
562:
557:
553:
549:
545:
542:
541:
536:
531:
527:
523:
517:
513:
511:
506:
505:
497:
493:
489:
488:elvenscout742
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
455:
451:
447:
443:
442:
441:
440:
437:
433:
429:
428:elvenscout742
425:
422:
418:
415:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
393:
390:
386:
382:
378:
373:
370:
366:
362:
358:
353:
352:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
333:
330:
326:
322:
317:
314:
313:
304:
300:
296:
291:
290:
289:
286:
283:
279:
275:
271:
270:
269:
265:
261:
257:
252:
251:
248:
245:
242:
238:
234:
233:
232:
231:
230:
229:
225:
221:
217:
214:
210:
209:
206:
203:
199:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
700:
697:
644:
633:
629:
625:
617:
600:
581:
543:
508:
471:
416:
335:
315:
212:
211:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
75:Kazuo Nagano
67:Kazuo Nagano
53:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
571:) has made
561:1.112.77.29
548:1.112.77.29
160:free images
706:talk page
626:extensive
586:Cavarrone
417:Weak Keep
401:• Gene93k
381:• Gene93k
361:• Gene93k
37:talk page
708:or in a
635:WP:NTEMP
630:relative
569:contribs
530:Contribs
510:Relisted
480:Japanese
472:probably
316:Comment:
119:View log
39:or in a
484:Chinese
285:Snowman
244:Snowman
205:Snowman
166:WP refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
56:MBisanz
645:before
605:BabbaQ
544:Delete
336:Delete
321:Nesnad
295:Nesnad
274:verify
260:Nesnad
237:WP:GNG
220:Nesnad
138:Google
96:delete
282:Giant
241:Giant
202:Giant
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
687:talk
653:talk
609:talk
601:Keep
590:talk
582:Note
565:talk
552:talk
526:Talk
522:Dori
492:talk
482:and
450:talk
446:DAJF
432:talk
405:talk
385:talk
365:talk
344:talk
340:DAJF
325:talk
299:talk
264:talk
224:talk
213:keep
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
188:TWL
117:– (
689:)
681:!
655:)
611:)
592:)
567:•
559:—
554:)
528:☯
494:)
452:)
434:)
407:)
399:.
387:)
379:.
367:)
359:.
346:)
327:)
301:)
266:)
226:)
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
52:.
685:(
651:(
607:(
588:(
563:(
550:(
532:☽
524:☾
490:(
448:(
430:(
403:(
383:(
363:(
342:(
323:(
297:(
262:(
222:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.