257:: I'm sorry, what?. It is not just a plot summary it is an 1-hour crossover special including Shin-chan and Den-O. It also features new characters. This special also promotes the I'm Born!. So if you want to delete this, might as well delete amen Rider Shin, ZO, and J. Or even the "Birth of 10th special". So don't decide until now to do this.
371:
Except the two third party sources are not to TV Guides but to a major newspaper in Japan and to an online news aggregator. The fact that this one particular episode was specifically mentioned to exist for the anime should confer that it is notable for inclusion. The
Japanese Knowledge (XXG) does not
341:
Just because it's a crossover doesn't make it notable. Also, just because there is an article on the
Japanese Knowledge (XXG) doesn't make it notable either. The Japanese Knowledge (XXG) has much lower standards of inclusion than the English Knowledge (XXG), as show by the inclusions of thousands of
380:
such that it can deserve its own article separate from those two pages. There are six references on the article. Three may be to the official websites that cover the media, but two are to news sources which are not trivial mentions or TV guide listings but actual articles on saying "This cartoon is
350:
by reliable third-party sources. Significant coverage is coverage that goes beyond announcements or a basic plot summary. However, all of the "sources" on the article are just that, announcements with absolutely no depth to the coverage. If we when by that standard, as advocated by the three keep
381:
going to happen", and the third is to show that figures were explicitly commissioned for the characters of this episode. One of the characters of Den-O did not have such a figure made of him until 3 years after the show aired, and he was in more than half of the show's 49 broadcast episodes.—
342:
articles on anime, manga, voice actors, and etc., almost all of them without a single source. I'll note that even the
Japanese article doesn't have a source. Since there is no subject specific notability guideline for television episodes, we must default to the
372:
use inline sources as we do and most definitely does not have articles on every episode of every anime or television show. They don't have articles for every
Seinfeld episode or every Buffy episode. The subject is unique from both
164:
225:
158:
119:
291:
294:, which shows that it is notable on its own for their much stricter standards. I have found more references to support the notability and will be working to find more.—
92:
87:
124:
96:
315:: Since it's a crossover between unrelated franchises, it can't easily be shoehorned into another article, and there are third-party sources as mentioned above.
195:
Non-notable episode that has not received significant coverage by reliable third-party sources to justify a stand-alone article. Article is nothing more than a
79:
179:
146:
17:
286:). There was independent coverage by reliable third party sources, but due to the age of the subject the reference to one of these (
399:
It's still nothing more than a program announcement, and announcements don't confer any form of notability. Notability is based on
83:
474:
457:
422:
394:
366:
331:
307:
266:
246:
214:
140:
61:
418:
362:
242:
210:
49:
136:
489:
36:
75:
67:
186:
326:
488:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
470:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
351:
comments above, then every episode would be "notable" as they will always be announced in various TV guides. —
152:
57:
274:: Episode is notable on its own as it is a crossover between two completely unrelated shows (the anime
262:
196:
466:
172:
414:
358:
238:
206:
434:
A notable crossover between two different notable shows. Sounds like a notable episode to me.
388:
377:
301:
282:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
343:
435:
373:
276:
53:
258:
409:
353:
321:
233:
201:
382:
295:
113:
316:
287:
290:) is down. The episode is covered at the Japanese Knowledge (XXG) at
346:. Under the general notability guideline, a subject most received
482:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109:
105:
101:
48:. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (
171:
226:
list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions
185:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
492:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
220:
465:Per above, notable crossover episode. -
224:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
407:such as program announcements. —
1:
344:general notability guideline
475:16:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
458:04:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
423:21:00, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
395:19:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
367:10:33, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
332:01:41, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
308:01:16, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
280:and the live-action series
267:01:13, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
247:01:07, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
215:01:07, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
62:00:08, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
509:
76:Kamen Rider Den-O + Shin-O
68:Kamen Rider Den-O + Shin-O
485:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
401:significant coverage
348:significant coverage
44:The result was
378:Kamen Rider Den-O
283:Kamen Rider Den-O
249:
229:
50:non-admin closure
500:
487:
454:
451:
448:
445:
442:
439:
405:trivial coverage
391:
385:
374:Crayon Shin-chan
329:
324:
319:
304:
298:
277:Crayon Shin-chan
230:
190:
189:
175:
127:
117:
99:
34:
508:
507:
503:
502:
501:
499:
498:
497:
496:
490:deletion review
483:
452:
449:
446:
443:
440:
437:
389:
383:
327:
322:
317:
302:
296:
292:ja:仮面ライダー電王+しん王
132:
123:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
506:
504:
495:
494:
478:
477:
467:Knowledgekid87
460:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
335:
334:
310:
269:
251:
250:
193:
192:
129:
125:AfD statistics
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
505:
493:
491:
486:
480:
479:
476:
472:
468:
464:
461:
459:
456:
455:
433:
430:
424:
420:
416:
412:
411:
406:
402:
398:
397:
396:
392:
386:
379:
375:
370:
369:
368:
364:
360:
356:
355:
349:
345:
340:
337:
336:
333:
330:
325:
320:
314:
311:
309:
305:
299:
293:
289:
285:
284:
279:
278:
273:
270:
268:
264:
260:
256:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
235:
227:
223:
219:
218:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
203:
198:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
126:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
484:
481:
462:
436:
431:
408:
404:
400:
352:
347:
338:
312:
281:
275:
271:
254:
232:
221:
200:
197:plot summary
194:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
45:
43:
31:
28:
159:free images
54:Ron Ritzman
263:AlienX2009
259:Xtreme2010
288:Sponichi
120:View log
384:Ryūlóng
339:Comment
297:Ryūlóng
165:WP refs
153:scholar
93:protect
88:history
403:, not
137:Google
97:delete
453:Focus
410:Farix
354:Farix
234:Farix
202:Farix
180:JSTOR
141:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
471:talk
463:Keep
432:Keep
376:and
313:Keep
272:Keep
265:~ )
255:Keep
231:-- —
222:Note
173:FENS
147:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
46:keep
318:jgp
261:( ~
199:. —
187:TWL
122:•
118:– (
473:)
421:)
417:|
393:)
390:竜龙
365:)
361:|
306:)
303:竜龙
245:)
241:|
228:.
213:)
209:|
167:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:)
469:(
450:m
447:a
444:e
441:r
438:D
419:c
415:t
413:(
387:(
363:c
359:t
357:(
328:C
323:T
300:(
243:c
239:t
237:(
211:c
207:t
205:(
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
128:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.