266:. There is no need for apology. I assume you are maybe new to posting here at wikipedia. Welcome to the pkace! This is a great article already. I explained on your talk page that although it is discouraged for you to edit the article, you make leave suggestions, sources, or ideas on the talk page, and I or others will evaluate what you post, and use what we can to expand the article and make it and wikipedia better. Congratulations on your award. Your stories sound interesting. If you understand all of this or if you have any question you may put them on my talk page or the article talk page. If you agree not to edit the article about you, I can take the autobiography notice down. As far as this deletion discussion, I have voted to snow keep the article, because I think this has just been misunderstanding. You may discuss or vote as well. All are welcomed to participate. Again, thank you for understanding, Let me know if you have any questions. an congratulations on your award.
55:.The nomination was in good faith, but being autobiographically written is not valid reason for deletion, especially in this case where the subject is clearly notable under both our subject specific notability guidelines (
178:
297:
our Danuta Gleed and
Trillium Book Award articles with this year's shortlists and winners — which means that in both of the articles that already had your name in them redlinked and waiting for an article,
63:
and the article is well-sourced. Mr. Hardcastle should be commended for his adherence to high ethical standards and this AfD has no reason to stay open for a full week. ----
172:
237:
131:
267:
138:
370:
293:
and formatting issues. (In fact, Kevin, you were already on my radar as a potential future article topic as it is, because I'm the guy who
104:
99:
108:
69:
17:
91:
193:
160:
285:, doing that does not always automatically force deletion of the article — rather, if the base notability claim and its
281:
is not the end of the world around here, if the article is fixable. While we certainly discourage people from starting
40:
154:
355:
335:
272:
253:
218:
73:
150:
229:
351:
200:
95:
36:
369:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either
233:
245:
282:
263:
210:
214:
186:
315:
56:
344:
322:
and I'll take a pass at fixing it up right now — I also agree with Fouetté that we should just
331:
166:
64:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
323:
290:
50:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
347:
87:
79:
278:
60:
241:
343:
agree with above comments, the editors can help the article rather than deleting, passes
286:
209:
Needs to be written by third party, not by the person in the article. With apologies..
327:
125:
306:
it there.) The awards in question are notable ones, they are sourceable, and
314:
of Canada's major national newspapers — and that adds up to enough to pass
289:
pass our tests, then we keep the article anyway and just clean it up for
363:
The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
373:
or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
121:
117:
113:
185:
238:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 8
199:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
326:close this as an honest misunderstanding.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
269:Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant
1:
236:). I have transcluded it to
61:general notability guideline
283:an article about themselves
262:There is no problem at all
228:This AfD was not correctly
390:
366:Please do not modify it.
356:01:45, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
336:23:58, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
273:04:28, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
254:04:15, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
219:04:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
74:01:53, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
310:has been reviewed in
279:conflict of interest
226:Automated comment:
256:
252:
53:/procedural close
381:
368:
270:
248:
247:Talk to my owner
243:
224:
204:
203:
189:
141:
129:
111:
88:Kevin Hardcastle
80:Kevin Hardcastle
34:
389:
388:
384:
383:
382:
380:
379:
378:
377:
371:this nomination
364:
268:
251:
246:
146:
137:
102:
86:
83:
72:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
387:
385:
376:
375:
359:
358:
338:
275:
257:
244:
207:
206:
143:
82:
77:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
386:
374:
372:
367:
361:
360:
357:
353:
349:
346:
342:
339:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
296:
292:
288:
287:sourceability
284:
280:
276:
274:
271:
265:
261:
258:
255:
249:
242:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
202:
198:
195:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
152:
149:
148:Find sources:
144:
140:
136:
133:
127:
123:
119:
115:
110:
106:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
84:
81:
78:
76:
75:
71:
70:contributions
66:
62:
58:
54:
52:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
365:
362:
340:
319:
311:
307:
303:
299:
294:
259:
232:to the log (
225:
208:
196:
190:
182:
175:
169:
163:
157:
147:
134:
65:Patar knight
49:
47:
31:
28:
348:Atlantic306
341:Speedy Keep
230:transcluded
173:free images
291:neutrality
59:) and the
316:WP:AUTHOR
264:KHardcase
260:Snow Keep
211:KHardcase
57:WP:AUTHOR
37:talk page
345:WP:BASIC
132:View log
39:or in a
328:Bearcat
324:WP:SNOW
295:updated
250::Online
179:WP refs
167:scholar
105:protect
100:history
308:Debris
234:step 3
151:Google
109:delete
194:JSTOR
155:books
139:Stats
126:views
118:watch
114:links
16:<
352:talk
332:talk
320:Keep
312:both
302:who
240:. —
215:talk
187:FENS
161:news
122:logs
96:talk
92:edit
51:SNOW
304:put
300:I'm
201:TWL
130:– (
67:- /
354:)
334:)
318:.
277:A
217:)
181:)
124:|
120:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
350:(
330:(
213:(
205:)
197:·
191:·
183:·
176:·
170:·
164:·
158:·
153:(
145:(
142:)
135:·
128:)
90:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.