197:
is an arbitrary/meaningless category -- the term gets no GBooks hits, and virtually all, if not all, the Ghits relate to this or related award categories, not do any topic with independent meaning. Even if this were to get a technical, tenuous PORNBIO pass, that is outweighed by the utter failure to even remotely approach meeting the GNG.
439:
resulted in keep due to several award wins, among them XBIZ and Best
Actress. Winning a subcategory of Best Actress is just as valid under PORNBIO as winning a generic Best Actress award. It's not unusual for porn awards to have Best Actress subcategories instead of a generic Best Actress award. XBIZ
472:
subcategories. The Eva
Angelina AfD I cited above had participants who voted keep with her AVN Best Actress (Video) award, a subcategory/not generic, being one of the reasons why. Even if, in addition to a Best Actress subcategory, an award show had a generic Best Actress award, the recipient of the
196:
Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No qualifying awards, just nominations. No independent reliable sourcing. No non-trivial biographical content. "Best
Actress—Couples-Themed Release" is a recently created, little-noted award category with no discernible selection criteria; in fact. "Couples-Themed Release"
481:) voted keep with her Venus Best Actress (International) award being one of the reasons why. XBIZ's Best Actress (Couples-Themed Release) is just as valid under PORNBIO as AVN's Best Actress (Video) and Venus's Best Actress (International).
717:
entries. Are these awards like the Oscars, with a nomination being a rare honour, or are dozens of people get nominated in each category? It also seems there is an awful lot of awards and all of them are claimed to be
370:. The PORNBIO standard requires a "well-known" and "significant" award, which is a higher standard than an "individual" award. This !vote misrepresents the applicable guideline and should therefore be disregarded.
165:
566:
257:
590:
237:
587:
572:
562:, even though she undeniably passes it ("Has won a well-known and significant industry award"), or asking that the article be deleted because she fails GNG, which doesn't matter.
118:
596:
159:
575:
599:
569:
563:
478:
436:
593:
581:
584:
217:
578:
125:
435:
for Best
Actress (Couples-Themed Release), which is a well-known/significant industry award that is not a scene-related/ensemble category.
214:
442:
Best
Actress (Feature Release), Best Actress (Parody Release), Best Actress (Couples-Themed Release), and Best Actress (All-Girl Release)
680:, the "Best Actress—Couples-Themed Release" award appears to be a niche award category instead of a "significant" award category. The
17:
507:
notability still needs to be demonstrated via significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, as per
692:. In general, well-developed Knowledge (XXG) articles need to have significantly more information in them than is displayed here
91:
86:
677:
475:
Christy Mack received a Best
Actress (International) Venus Award in a ceremony where a generic Best Actress award was also given
469:
465:
375:
202:
95:
660:
470:
Best
Actress (Hungary), Best Actress (Scandinavia), Best Actress (France), Best Actress (Germany), and Best Actress (Europe)
457:
180:
78:
147:
474:
750:
40:
684:
award categories for "Best
Actress, Video" & "Best Actress, Film" are apparently a relic of the days when certain
449:
371:
198:
325:
285:
654:
about Keira Nicole except that she's won and been nominated for awards. That's just not enough to be notable. —
545:
638:
The keep-ers seem to have neglected to read the introduction to PORNBIO, which says: "People are likely to be
141:
137:
746:
731:
727:
705:
664:
628:
624:
611:
607:
550:
520:
516:
490:
486:
419:
415:
402:
379:
362:
358:
336:
306:
302:
289:
269:
249:
229:
206:
60:
36:
693:
82:
316:
281:
559:
428:
187:
533:
499:
What is the coverage that demonstrates the subject's notability? An awards confers some measure of
173:
74:
66:
349:
notability still needs to be demonstrated via "significant coverage in reliable sources" as per
701:
689:
265:
245:
225:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
745:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
723:
620:
603:
512:
482:
453:
411:
354:
298:
616:
508:
350:
372:
The Big Bad
Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.
199:
The Big Bad
Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.
153:
390:
280:
She does not pass even the low notability criteria we have set for pornographic actors.
655:
619:
may apply. As part of AfD, each article is evaluated on its own merits, I believe.
697:
261:
241:
221:
54:
112:
461:
685:
673:
432:
314:- she won individual award, she meets the notability criteria of WP:PORNBIO.
681:
445:
713:-- I am also curious why this (and related) articles prominently display
650:" (bolding in original, underlining added) The article says absolutely
532:
as nothing at all close for the substance of independent notability.
441:
739:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
558:. All delete votes above are either claiming that Nicole fails
458:
Best Actress (Fan's Choice) and Best Actress (Editor's Choice)
258:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
238:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
108:
104:
100:
172:
186:
479:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Christy Mack
437:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Eva Angelina
678:"well-known" adult film "industry award" ceremony
642:if they meet any of the following standards. ...
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
753:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
648:guarantee that a subject should be included.
450:Best Actress (Film) and Best Actress (Video)
256:Note: This debate has been included in the
236:Note: This debate has been included in the
255:
235:
688:were release in certain theaters or just
341:Comment: an award confers some nature of
297:-- coverage does not suggest notability.
213:Note: This debate has been added to the
473:subcategory would also pass PORNBIO.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
444:subcategories is no different from
24:
477:, and participants in her AfD (
1:
389:as fails PORNBIO & GNG. –
732:02:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
706:02:38, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
665:18:14, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
629:15:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
612:15:25, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
61:20:41, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
770:
551:22:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
521:09:20, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
491:07:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
420:02:40, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
403:02:32, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
380:13:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
363:09:31, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
337:01:35, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
307:18:33, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
290:15:18, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
270:13:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
250:13:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
230:13:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
207:13:13, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
644:meeting one or more does
742:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
215:WikiProject Pornography
617:Consensus can change
503:notability, but the
466:Best Actress (USA)
460:subcategories, or
690:straight-to-video
333:
282:John Pack Lambert
272:
252:
218:list of deletions
761:
744:
676:are certainly a
548:
543:
400:
395:
345:notability, but
335:
334:
331:
328:
322:
321:
232:
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
57:
34:
769:
768:
764:
763:
762:
760:
759:
758:
757:
751:deletion review
740:
663:
546:
534:
452:subcategories,
396:
391:
326:
324:
319:
317:
315:
212:
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
767:
765:
756:
755:
735:
734:
708:
667:
659:
633:
632:
631:
553:
526:
525:
524:
523:
494:
493:
422:
405:
384:
383:
382:
365:
330:
309:
292:
274:
273:
253:
233:
194:
193:
130:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
766:
754:
752:
748:
743:
737:
736:
733:
729:
725:
721:
716:
712:
709:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
671:
668:
666:
662:
657:
653:
649:
647:
641:
637:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
615:
614:
613:
609:
605:
601:
598:
595:
592:
589:
586:
583:
580:
577:
574:
571:
568:
565:
561:
557:
554:
552:
549:
544:
541:
537:
531:
528:
527:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
497:
496:
495:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
438:
434:
430:
426:
423:
421:
417:
413:
409:
406:
404:
401:
399:
394:
388:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
366:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
339:
338:
329:
323:
313:
310:
308:
304:
300:
296:
293:
291:
287:
283:
279:
276:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
254:
251:
247:
243:
239:
234:
231:
227:
223:
219:
216:
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
741:
738:
719:
714:
710:
694:at this time
672:- While the
669:
651:
645:
643:
639:
635:
555:
539:
535:
529:
504:
500:
424:
407:
397:
392:
386:
367:
346:
342:
311:
294:
277:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
75:Keira Nicole
67:Keira Nicole
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
724:K.e.coffman
720:significant
686:adult films
674:XBIZ Awards
621:K.e.coffman
604:Rebecca1990
513:K.e.coffman
483:Rebecca1990
412:Lepricavark
410:fails GNG.
355:K.e.coffman
318:Subtropical
299:K.e.coffman
160:free images
570:repeatedly
560:WP:PORNBIO
454:NightMoves
433:XBIZ Award
429:WP:PORNBIO
747:talk page
715:Nominated
682:AVN Award
573:supported
564:Consensus
431:with her
427:. Passes
262:• Gene93k
242:• Gene93k
222:• Gene93k
37:talk page
749:or in a
656:MShabazz
579:articles
501:presumed
343:possible
119:View log
39:or in a
711:Comment
698:Guy1890
670:Comment
652:nothing
640:notable
600:PORNBIO
576:keeping
556:Comment
464:having
456:having
448:having
440:having
368:Comment
166:WP refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
56:MBisanz
636:Delete
542:wister
538:wister
530:Delete
509:WP:GNG
505:actual
408:Delete
387:Delete
351:WP:GNG
347:actual
332:(en-2)
295:Delete
278:Delete
138:Google
96:delete
50:delete
661:Stalk
462:Venus
393:Davey
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
728:talk
702:talk
625:talk
608:talk
597:pass
594:they
585:fail
582:that
547:talk
517:talk
487:talk
425:Keep
416:talk
398:2010
376:talk
359:talk
327:talk
320:-man
312:Keep
303:talk
286:talk
266:talk
246:talk
226:talk
203:talk
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
646:not
588:GNG
567:has
446:AVN
188:TWL
117:– (
52:.
730:)
722:.
704:)
696:.
627:)
610:)
602:.
591:if
519:)
511:.
489:)
468:,
418:)
378:)
361:)
353:.
305:)
288:)
268:)
260:.
248:)
240:.
228:)
220:.
205:)
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
726:(
700:(
658:/
623:(
606:(
540:T
536:S
515:(
485:(
414:(
374:(
357:(
301:(
284:(
264:(
244:(
224:(
201:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.