726:" is unhelpful to this discussion, and is incorrect in that there is no such "standard practice" used by the 347 ARS members. Even if you feel one or two might do so, denigrating the other 345 is not at all helpful. I am trying to civilly determine whether or not to support this deletion. In addressing
191:
Possible failure of WP:PORNBIO. She has only been nominated for one award, not across multiple year. Being
Penthouse Pet of the Month does not satisfy notability criteria and she only appears to have appeared in one video not 'featured multiple times in notable mainstream media.'
826:
She was the
Penthouse Pet of the Month for May 2001. In the Andrew Blake 2003 film Hard Edge, noted by AVN as one of the 500 Greatest Adult Films of All Time. In 2007 Kelle Marie was featured in a Good Magazine produced online video about Internet
806:
She has two acceptably notable appearances, and
Penthouse PotM, and the rest of her body may be adult only, but is substantial. I actually found her article after reading a reference to her, which is the point of Knowledge
347:
536:
160:
410:
473:
235:
614:
Dunno about what she directed, but the listings on IMDB look to be whole adult-oriented material; the only one that might not be is the "Sex, Footballers and
Videotape" entry.
115:
341:
682:, and a few others... so if that film is seen as notable, and with her appearance on the Stearns show to be definitely featured, she might just be barely edging up on "
530:
154:
404:
467:
212:
700:
The standard ARS tactic of googlebombing with random references that have little or no content, and little or nothing to do with the subject is depreciated.
719:
864:- How are those things notable? There is consensus that being Playmate/pet of the month does not assert notability. Being in a film that was named as 1 of
776:
as links that specifically dealt with that film... and which might even merit the film having its own article. So please, shall we stay on topic?
120:
715:
209:
17:
730:'s comment about the non-porn film "Sex, Footballers and Videotape", and in determining whether or not it might itself be seen as "
362:
771:
677:
329:
88:
83:
92:
551:
175:
425:
518:
142:
75:
892:
392:
36:
488:
323:
455:
785:
695:
602:
581:
753:
659:
891:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
319:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
512:
136:
714:@ Hipocrite: Pardon me if I not not appreciate your negative and bad faith accusation toward myself and the
386:
747:
653:
369:
741:
735:
647:
641:
259:
fails GNG as she lacks substantive coverage in reliable third party sources, and PORNBIO is depreciated.
508:
132:
877:
852:
816:
788:
709:
623:
605:
584:
449:
382:
307:
286:
268:
250:
224:
201:
57:
79:
778:
688:
595:
574:
869:
193:
873:
812:
705:
558:
544:
481:
418:
355:
264:
197:
182:
168:
445:
432:
619:
303:
282:
71:
63:
335:
759:
665:
568:
So what happens if the person does not get multiple notable nominations, but seems to push at
246:
220:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
724:...standard ARS tactic of googlebombing with random references that have little or no content
495:
830:
53:
765:
671:
569:
524:
148:
398:
808:
701:
260:
727:
615:
299:
278:
868:
films is not really notable and the online video appears to be totally non-notable.
633:
629:
461:
242:
216:
109:
718:. Attempting to negatively color this discussion by denigrating the efforts of
590:
49:
686:"... though yes, her role in the film does not seem to be at all major.
593:
mainstream? And did the two films she directed get any positive reviews?
885:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
640:
might itself be notable enough for an article per such as
236:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
105:
101:
97:
636:
to be considered notable and "mainstream" enough, and
543:
480:
417:
354:
167:
589:
And are any of the 75 films or 3 Television programs
824:
For the three reasons listed in the article itself.
684:
featured multiple times in notable mainstream media
557:
494:
431:
368:
181:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
895:). No further edits should be made to this page.
720:several hundered contributing members of the ARS
8:
230:
829:Sounds like three notable things to me.
234:: This debate has been included in the
208:Note: This debate has been added to the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
277:Like hell is PORNBIO depreciated!
24:
638:Sex, Footballers and Videotape
1:
912:
878:15:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
853:06:07, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
817:20:52, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
789:19:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
710:04:35, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
624:12:32, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
606:08:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
585:03:33, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
308:01:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
287:01:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
269:17:33, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
251:17:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
225:17:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
202:17:15, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
58:13:23, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
888:Please do not modify it.
732:notable mainstream media
32:Please do not modify it.
716:Article Rescue Squadron
210:WikiProject Pornography
767:Scottish Media Monitor
673:Scottish Media Monitor
722:with your statement "
44:The result was
253:
239:
213:list of deletions
903:
890:
849:
846:
843:
840:
837:
834:
781:
755:Evening Standard
691:
661:Evening Standard
598:
577:
562:
561:
547:
499:
498:
484:
436:
435:
421:
373:
372:
358:
240:
227:
186:
185:
171:
123:
113:
95:
34:
911:
910:
906:
905:
904:
902:
901:
900:
899:
893:deletion review
886:
847:
844:
841:
838:
835:
832:
779:
689:
632:has won enough
596:
575:
504:
441:
378:
315:
207:
128:
119:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
909:
907:
898:
897:
882:
881:
880:
856:
855:
819:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
609:
608:
587:
565:
564:
501:
438:
375:
311:
310:
292:
291:
290:
289:
272:
271:
254:
228:
189:
188:
125:
121:AfD statistics
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
908:
896:
894:
889:
883:
879:
875:
871:
867:
863:
860:
859:
858:
857:
854:
851:
850:
828:
823:
820:
818:
814:
810:
805:
802:
801:
790:
787:
786:
783:
782:
775:
774:
769:
768:
763:
762:
757:
756:
751:
750:
745:
744:
743:Sunday Herald
739:
738:
737:Sunday Herald
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
713:
712:
711:
707:
703:
699:
698:
697:
696:
693:
692:
685:
681:
680:
675:
674:
669:
668:
663:
662:
657:
656:
651:
650:
649:Sunday Herald
645:
644:
643:Sunday Herald
639:
635:
631:
627:
626:
625:
621:
617:
613:
612:
611:
610:
607:
604:
603:
600:
599:
592:
588:
586:
583:
582:
579:
578:
571:
567:
566:
560:
556:
553:
550:
546:
542:
538:
535:
532:
529:
526:
523:
520:
517:
514:
510:
507:
506:Find sources:
502:
497:
493:
490:
487:
483:
479:
475:
472:
469:
466:
463:
460:
457:
454:
451:
447:
444:
443:Find sources:
439:
434:
430:
427:
424:
420:
416:
412:
409:
406:
403:
400:
397:
394:
391:
388:
384:
381:
380:Find sources:
376:
371:
367:
364:
361:
357:
353:
349:
346:
343:
340:
337:
334:
331:
328:
325:
321:
318:
317:Find sources:
313:
312:
309:
305:
301:
297:
294:
293:
288:
284:
280:
276:
275:
274:
273:
270:
266:
262:
258:
255:
252:
248:
244:
237:
233:
229:
226:
222:
218:
214:
211:
206:
205:
204:
203:
199:
195:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
887:
884:
865:
861:
831:
827:pornography.
825:
821:
803:
784:
777:
772:
766:
761:The Guardian
760:
754:
749:The Guardian
748:
742:
736:
734:, I offered
731:
723:
694:
687:
683:
678:
672:
667:The Guardian
666:
660:
655:The Guardian
654:
648:
642:
637:
630:Howard Stern
601:
594:
580:
573:
554:
548:
540:
533:
527:
521:
515:
505:
491:
485:
477:
470:
464:
458:
452:
442:
428:
422:
414:
407:
401:
395:
389:
379:
365:
359:
351:
344:
338:
332:
326:
316:
295:
256:
231:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
591:listed here
531:free images
468:free images
405:free images
342:free images
155:free images
72:Kelle Marie
64:Kelle Marie
870:EuroPride
809:Mzmadmike
702:Hipocrite
298:per nom.
261:Hipocrite
243:• Gene93k
217:• Gene93k
194:EuroPride
780:Schmidt,
773:Sky News
728:Tabercil
690:Schmidt,
679:Sky News
628:Well...
616:Tabercil
597:Schmidt,
576:Schmidt,
572:anyway?
300:Tabercil
279:Tabercil
116:View log
862:Comment
537:WP refs
525:scholar
474:WP refs
462:scholar
411:WP refs
399:scholar
348:WP refs
336:scholar
161:WP refs
149:scholar
89:protect
84:history
807:(XXG).
770:, and
634:awards
570:WP:GNG
509:Google
446:Google
383:Google
320:Google
296:Delete
257:Delete
133:Google
93:delete
50:Stifle
848:Focus
552:JSTOR
513:books
489:JSTOR
450:books
426:JSTOR
387:books
363:JSTOR
324:books
176:JSTOR
137:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
874:talk
822:Keep
813:talk
804:Keep
706:talk
620:talk
545:FENS
519:news
482:FENS
456:news
419:FENS
393:news
356:FENS
330:news
304:talk
283:talk
265:talk
247:talk
232:Note
221:talk
198:talk
169:FENS
143:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
866:500
559:TWL
496:TWL
433:TWL
370:TWL
241:--
183:TWL
118:•
114:– (
876:)
815:)
764:,
758:,
752:,
746:,
740:,
708:)
676:,
670:,
664:,
658:,
652:,
646:,
622:)
539:)
476:)
413:)
350:)
306:)
285:)
267:)
249:)
238:.
223:)
215:.
200:)
163:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
872:(
845:m
842:a
839:e
836:r
833:D
811:(
704:(
618:(
563:)
555:·
549:·
541:·
534:·
528:·
522:·
516:·
511:(
503:(
500:)
492:·
486:·
478:·
471:·
465:·
459:·
453:·
448:(
440:(
437:)
429:·
423:·
415:·
408:·
402:·
396:·
390:·
385:(
377:(
374:)
366:·
360:·
352:·
345:·
339:·
333:·
327:·
322:(
314:(
302:(
281:(
263:(
245:(
219:(
196:(
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.