204:
have regular clients. A large number of plus-size models have been in national magazines and on TV shows. The highest paid plus-size models earn US$ 100K per annum, and her client list does not suggest she is notable in that particular respect either. She is not represented by a New York based agent, which indicates that her notability does not extend far into her own industry. Genuine credits or not, this entry is vanity-based and does not merit inclusion. Hers is not a celebrity or household name in
America nor anywhere else in the world, and the entry does not meet the Wiki guidelines for inclusion of people. If anything, I suggest a merge into a suitable place within the entry for
220:. I wouldn't characterize this as totally lacking sources, the Bombshell magazine one looks passable enough, but that's only one, and the primary notability criteria asks for multiple independent sources. Google doesn't seem to turn up much (I'm assuming this woman is not the same as the one who plays for the Saskatchewan Female Midget AAA Hockey League). It has only been seven weeks since the last AfD, but there doesn't seem to have been much meaningful activity in that interim. A borderline case, but I don't think there's quite enough there. But I certainly think that recreation should be allowed if more sources turn up.
238:, only that all of the work cited is what is done in usual course of business for a model, and that in and of itself it does not merit her entry to the Wiki. Bombshell Magazine is a grassroots, free-to-all webzine and during startup actively canvassed for photos to use on its covers and for its articles that models, eager for free publicity, submitted for free use. Olson's appearance in the webzine falls into that period. Furthermore, all citing of images and discussions of Olson on
203:
that makes her noteworthy. ALL plus size models are being scrutinized right now and enjoying heightened media attention as a result of the skinny model debate. Should we give them all an entry? The other claims are also in line with the regular business of a model: The majority of plus-size models
250:
By way of a belated introduction, I have been in the fashion industry for over 10 years, and I know Olson's true stature. Without prejudice - she simply doesn't merit an entry... yet.
242:
as proof that the model is noteworthy must be tempered with the knowledge that the website is poorly regarded by model agents and clients, and that it is censored vigorously and with
155:
even though the prior AFD was just seven weeks ago. Most of the "references" are to a fan BBS (or something like that). She may be notable, but this doesn't really back it up.--
119:
246:
prejudice by the web admin. Ironically, many discussions about the site's heavy censorship and the preferences exhibited are resident on
Bombshell's sister site,
135:
247:
185:
The credits seem genuine, despite their being listed on a public bulletin board. The agencies and magazine pages seem real. Worthy enough of a mention
92:
87:
254:
229:
212:
189:
177:
163:
146:
96:
61:
17:
79:
271:
36:
270:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
143:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
186:
127:
83:
55:
75:
67:
160:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
251:
225:
209:
205:
50:
156:
131:
113:
208:, but there are many other models that should be ahead of Ms Olson in the queue.
221:
173:
239:
264:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
171:
The close at the previous AfD was "Keep and add sources:
109:
105:
101:
199:
This model does nothing ouside of the sphere of the
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
274:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
248:Curvy Chick (click for a link to one)
7:
234:I did not state it lacked sources
24:
240:http://www.judgementofparis.com
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
201:regular business of modelling
291:
255:08:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
230:02:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
213:02:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
190:00:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
178:00:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
134:}} to the page and listed
126:Completing nomination for
62:22:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
164:21:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
147:09:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
267:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
144:Resurgent insurgent
130:, who only added {{
236:in this discussion
136:the old closed AfD
282:
269:
138:on today's log.
117:
99:
60:
34:
290:
289:
285:
284:
283:
281:
280:
279:
278:
272:deletion review
265:
228:
206:plus-size model
90:
74:
71:
49:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
288:
286:
277:
276:
260:
259:
258:
257:
224:
215:
193:
192:
187:209.244.16.205
180:
166:
124:
123:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
287:
275:
273:
268:
262:
261:
256:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
232:
231:
227:
223:
219:
216:
214:
211:
207:
202:
198:
197:Strong Delete
195:
194:
191:
188:
184:
181:
179:
176:
175:
170:
167:
165:
162:
158:
154:
151:
150:
149:
148:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
58:
54:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
266:
263:
243:
235:
217:
200:
196:
182:
172:
168:
152:
139:
128:203.36.120.5
125:
76:Kelsey Olson
68:Kelsey Olson
56:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
218:Weak delete
169:Weak delete
252:AntiVanity
210:AntiVanity
140:No opinion
183:Weak keep
157:Dhartung
120:View log
244:extreme
93:protect
88:history
153:Delete
97:delete
57:scribe
46:delete
222:Xtifr
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
226:tälk
161:Talk
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
174:DGG
132:afd
118:– (
52:WjB
159:|
142:.
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
48:.
122:)
116:)
78:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.