Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Ken Pugh (Fellow Consultant) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

372:
shows use in the classroom. That would explain both the high library and end-user holdings (school textbook). How many syllabus examples are needed to prove notability is purely subjective but most syllabus are ephemeral so even seeing a couple is a good sign there are many more not visible and this
161: 315: 155: 114: 233: 255: 211: 335: 87: 82: 121: 91: 74: 373:
shows a dozen at least (have not looked through them all). The article content can be cleaned up easily enough since AfD is topic-level not content-level. --
176: 143: 366:(book ranked book #142,548 out of 8 million titles cataloged by users), but also unable to find book reviews. Unusual. However a search of 17: 137: 420: 388: 347: 327: 306: 289: 269: 247: 225: 203: 56: 133: 297:
promotional content and improperly sourced. If someone wants to write a proper article it would be better to start fresh.
183: 439: 78: 40: 302: 70: 62: 368: 413: 381: 149: 298: 435: 36: 280:
About 100 library holding for each of his books, but I can find only notices, not substantial reviews,
285: 406: 374: 169: 398: 343: 323: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
434:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
402: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
359: 281: 53: 339: 319: 108: 401:
not AUTHOR. If anyone knows how or if a textbook author is applied, perhaps with
363: 259: 237: 215: 193: 428:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
316:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
104: 100: 96: 168: 192:Promotional, lack of reliable, independent sources 182: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 442:). No further edits should be made to this page. 234:list of Computing-related deletion discussions 256:list of Websites-related deletion discussions 212:list of Internet-related deletion discussions 8: 336:list of Authors-related deletion discussions 334:Note: This debate has been included in the 314:Note: This debate has been included in the 254:Note: This debate has been included in the 232:Note: This debate has been included in the 210:Note: This debate has been included in the 397:Actually I think my argument above is for 333: 313: 253: 231: 209: 369:"Interface Oriented Design" pugh syllabus 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 362:'s WorldCat, I'm also seeing high 24: 364:end-user holdings at LibraryThing 1: 421:02:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC) 389:02:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC) 348:03:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC) 328:03:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC) 307:00:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC) 290:19:39, 24 February 2014 (UTC) 270:19:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC) 248:19:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC) 226:19:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC) 204:19:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC) 71:Ken Pugh (Fellow Consultant) 63:Ken Pugh (Fellow Consultant) 459: 57:10:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC) 431:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 48:The result was 350: 330: 299:Candleabracadabra 272: 250: 228: 450: 433: 418: 411: 386: 379: 371: 267: 245: 223: 201: 187: 186: 172: 124: 112: 94: 34: 458: 457: 453: 452: 451: 449: 448: 447: 446: 440:deletion review 429: 414: 407: 382: 375: 367: 358:In addition to 282:'DGG (at NYPL)' 260: 238: 216: 194: 129: 120: 85: 69: 66: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 456: 454: 445: 444: 425: 424: 423: 392: 391: 352: 351: 331: 310: 309: 292: 274: 273: 251: 229: 190: 189: 126: 65: 60: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 455: 443: 441: 437: 432: 426: 422: 419: 417: 412: 410: 404: 400: 396: 395: 394: 393: 390: 387: 385: 380: 378: 370: 365: 361: 357: 354: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 332: 329: 325: 321: 317: 312: 311: 308: 304: 300: 296: 293: 291: 287: 283: 279: 278:Possible keep 276: 275: 271: 268: 265: 264: 257: 252: 249: 246: 243: 242: 235: 230: 227: 224: 221: 220: 213: 208: 207: 206: 205: 202: 199: 198: 185: 181: 178: 175: 171: 167: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 135: 132: 131:Find sources: 127: 123: 119: 116: 110: 106: 102: 98: 93: 89: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 67: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 430: 427: 415: 408: 383: 376: 355: 294: 277: 262: 261: 240: 239: 218: 217: 196: 195: 191: 179: 173: 165: 158: 152: 146: 140: 130: 117: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 156:free images 436:talk page 340:• Gene93k 320:• Gene93k 54:Lankiveil 37:talk page 438:or in a 399:WP:NBOOK 115:View log 39:or in a 403:WP:PROF 162:WP refs 150:scholar 88:protect 83:history 295:Delete 134:Google 92:delete 409:Green 405:. -- 377:Green 177:JSTOR 138:books 122:Stats 109:views 101:watch 97:links 16:< 356:Keep 344:talk 324:talk 303:talk 286:talk 170:FENS 144:news 105:logs 79:talk 75:edit 360:DGG 184:TWL 113:– ( 346:) 338:. 326:) 318:. 305:) 288:) 266:iz 258:. 244:iz 236:. 222:iz 214:. 200:iz 164:) 107:| 103:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 81:| 77:| 52:. 416:C 384:C 342:( 322:( 301:( 284:( 263:L 241:L 219:L 197:L 188:) 180:· 174:· 166:· 159:· 153:· 147:· 141:· 136:( 128:( 125:) 118:· 111:) 73:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Lankiveil
10:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Ken Pugh (Fellow Consultant)
Ken Pugh (Fellow Consultant)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Liz
19:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
list of Internet-related deletion discussions

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.