484:
as saying what you want it to say. But it doesn't. It says all judges who hold statewide office (which he clearly does, as a judge of a central appellate court which deals with the whole state as opposed to a part of the state) are notable. It's quite clear. It's not open to interpretation. It says
578:
If we had several sources showing this judges actions were impactful, we could keep the article. However, at this level judges are not treated as statewide office holders, but as local ones. In the same way we do not create articles on all trustees of universities that are elected statewide and
161:
422:
other judge with an article besides
Buettner, and even that article has quite a bit more substance (although not brilliant sourcing) beyond just stating that she exists, which is all that's present here. A
466:
from having to be improved. It has yet to be shown, however, that
Buettner (or any other judge at his level) has the necessary degree of sourceability to be improvable from where this is right now.
114:
209:
155:
249:
427:
article about an appellate court judge, sure, by all means — but there's exactly zero value in a boilerplate article which just says the subject exists, the end.
229:
579:
similar positions. Statewide office holders in the judicial sense means members of the state supreme court, or equivalently named similar court.
280:, but it is not an automatic inclusion freebie that entitles the judge to keep an unsourced article just because his profile on the court's own
121:
87:
82:
91:
366:
get a notability freebie just by having a staff profile on the website of their own employer — they get in the door by having enough
324:
as a judge who holds a statewide office. An official website is clearly not "self-published" and is a perfectly reliable source. --
74:
458:
get enough coverage to pass GNG and their articles are always improvable accordingly — but the article gets the pass because it's
176:
17:
143:
388:
however confirm that he holds the post and his biographical details, which was my point. I notice you haven't addressed
450:
pass GNG. Even if an article about a state or federal legislator is technically inadequate in its existing form, we
547:
137:
607:
584:
40:
588:
568:
528:
494:
475:
401:
379:
333:
312:
293:
261:
241:
221:
201:
56:
133:
603:
257:
237:
217:
197:
183:
78:
36:
410:
to judges on intermediate-level courts — there's no automatic presumption of notability for all judges
580:
490:
481:
434:
extend an automatic presumption of notability to all holders, we don't do so because they're somehow
407:
397:
389:
329:
321:
507:
enjoy the same presumption of notability that higher ones do, and (b) the articles still have to be
301:
judge of the
Highest level of state appellate courts is notable, but not necessarily below that.
169:
524:
499:
No, I'm not "interpreting" anything in terms of what I want it to say. AFD has an established
471:
375:
289:
281:
149:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
602:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
253:
233:
213:
193:
70:
62:
486:
393:
325:
559:
515:
from having to have reliable source coverage just because a notability claim has been
192:
Subject appears to fail GNG. I found no evidence of sources demonstrating notability.
439:
308:
277:
520:
467:
371:
285:
273:
53:
108:
272:. Being an appellate court judge can be a notability criterion, if he can be
418:
level of an appellate court. Going by this court's article, there's only
303:
406:
DGG's comment above you is entirely correct about the relationship of
485:
nothing about only the top-level appellate judges being notable. --
596:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
550:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
104:
100:
96:
346:
form of direct affiliation with the subject. I didn't
168:
430:
And even for the levels of political office where we
362:
him, which is still a direct affiliation. People do
556:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
276:as the subject of enough media coverage to clear
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
610:). No further edits should be made to this page.
210:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
342:A source cannot support notability if it has
250:list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions
182:
8:
350:the court's website was "self-published" by
248:Note: This debate has been included in the
228:Note: This debate has been included in the
208:Note: This debate has been included in the
284:website nominally verifies that he exists.
392:, an established notability guideline! --
247:
227:
207:
358:self-published by the organization that
230:list of Law-related deletion discussions
7:
442:— we do that because we know for a
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
462:, not because it's in any way
1:
589:20:02, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
569:17:01, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
529:15:30, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
495:13:55, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
480:It seems you're interpreting
476:19:45, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
402:16:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
380:16:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
334:16:30, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
313:00:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
294:17:38, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
262:17:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
242:17:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
222:17:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
202:17:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
57:07:30, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
503:that (a) lower-level courts
627:
599:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
370:coverage to clear GNG.
320:. Clearly notable per
438:from having to pass
581:John Pack Lambert
571:
567:
264:
244:
224:
618:
601:
566:
564:
557:
555:
553:
551:
274:properly sourced
187:
186:
172:
124:
112:
94:
71:Kenneth Buettner
63:Kenneth Buettner
34:
626:
625:
621:
620:
619:
617:
616:
615:
614:
608:deletion review
597:
572:
560:
558:
546:
544:
129:
120:
85:
69:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
624:
622:
613:
612:
592:
591:
554:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
511:, and are not
428:
337:
336:
315:
296:
282:self-published
266:
265:
245:
225:
190:
189:
126:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
623:
611:
609:
605:
600:
594:
593:
590:
586:
582:
577:
574:
573:
570:
565:
563:
552:
549:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
497:
496:
492:
488:
483:
482:WP:POLITICIAN
479:
478:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
426:
421:
417:
413:
409:
408:WP:POLITICIAN
405:
404:
403:
399:
395:
391:
390:WP:POLITICIAN
387:
383:
382:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
340:
339:
338:
335:
331:
327:
323:
322:WP:POLITICIAN
319:
316:
314:
310:
306:
305:
300:
297:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
268:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
246:
243:
239:
235:
231:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
206:
205:
204:
203:
199:
195:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
123:
119:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
598:
595:
575:
561:
545:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
435:
431:
424:
419:
415:
411:
385:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
317:
302:
298:
269:
191:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
117:
49:
47:
31:
28:
254:Lepricavark
234:Lepricavark
214:Lepricavark
194:Lepricavark
156:free images
562:Sandstein
487:Necrothesp
460:improvable
454:that they
446:that they
394:Necrothesp
326:Necrothesp
604:talk page
501:consensus
354:— but it
37:talk page
606:or in a
548:Relisted
517:asserted
513:exempted
464:exempted
436:exempted
115:View log
39:or in a
521:Bearcat
509:sourced
468:Bearcat
416:highest
372:Bearcat
360:employs
299:Delete.
286:Bearcat
162:WP refs
150:scholar
88:protect
83:history
54:Spartaz
576:Delete
448:always
440:WP:GNG
278:WP:GNG
270:Delete
134:Google
92:delete
50:delete
505:don't
412:below
368:media
309:talk
177:JSTOR
138:books
122:Stats
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
585:talk
525:talk
491:talk
472:talk
452:know
444:fact
425:good
414:the
398:talk
376:talk
330:talk
318:Keep
290:talk
258:talk
238:talk
218:talk
198:talk
170:FENS
144:news
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
420:one
386:can
384:It
364:not
352:him
348:say
344:any
304:DGG
184:TWL
113:– (
587:)
527:)
519:.
493:)
474:)
456:do
432:do
400:)
378:)
356:is
332:)
311:)
292:)
260:)
252:.
240:)
232:.
220:)
212:.
200:)
164:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
52:.
583:(
523:(
489:(
470:(
396:(
374:(
328:(
307:(
288:(
256:(
236:(
216:(
196:(
188:)
180:·
174:·
166:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
136:(
128:(
125:)
118:·
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.