317:
197:
I doubt that this person meets the notability criteria: most of the references lead to her own website, and I'm not sure whether a couple of mentions in the external sources (one is dated 1988) are enough to establish notability. Besides, the article was created by
460:, the other citations, six publications by reputable publishers -- this seems clear-cut to me. I have no problem with a notable author requesting that an article be written about her -- isn't that the best way to make sure it gets done without COI issues?
240:: I have refactored the nomination to include the standard AfD templates. The nomination was not transcluded in the daily AfD Log, I will add it now. Please consider this the time of initial listing for closing purposes.
166:
338:-- If notable at all, I would regard her as on the margins of notability. Does the fact that a book has been reviewed in a major newspaper make the author notable? I am very dubious.
262:
160:
121:
284:
363:-- I see three major newspaper reviews here, which precisely meets #3, although I'm personally generally willing to accept the NYT as an arbiter of notability.
126:
94:
89:
98:
81:
181:
17:
469:
372:
148:
319:
142:
490:
310:
40:
207:
57:
471:
436:
405:
374:
347:
330:
298:
276:
253:
230:
211:
63:
313:
138:
343:
486:
432:
401:
188:
85:
36:
315:
326:
203:
174:
53:
464:
367:
339:
246:
226:
294:
272:
154:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
485:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
428:
417:
397:
386:
360:
77:
69:
322:
461:
364:
241:
222:
290:
268:
115:
312:
shows coverage of the subject and her writings in multiple reliable sources, e.g.
420:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
389:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
479:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
218:
199:
111:
107:
103:
173:
427:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
396:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
359:. Yes, that's exactly what is said in point #3 of
263:list of Christianity-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
493:). No further edits should be made to this page.
202:, so it seems a lot like self-advertising. --
187:
8:
285:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
283:Note: This debate has been included in the
261:Note: This debate has been included in the
448:. The Lambda nomination, a review in the
282:
260:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
221:is completely legitimate...
64:02:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
510:
472:21:39, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
437:20:20, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
375:21:45, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
406:20:19, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
348:16:52, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
331:05:07, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
299:22:31, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
277:22:30, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
254:20:06, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
482:Please do not modify it.
231:19:09, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
212:08:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
48:The result was
439:
408:
301:
288:
279:
266:
251:
501:
484:
426:
422:
395:
391:
289:
267:
247:
244:
192:
191:
177:
129:
119:
101:
78:Kittredge Cherry
70:Kittredge Cherry
60:
34:
509:
508:
504:
503:
502:
500:
499:
498:
497:
491:deletion review
480:
467:
415:
384:
370:
250:
242:
200:her own request
134:
125:
92:
76:
73:
62:
58:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
507:
505:
496:
495:
475:
474:
465:
442:
441:
440:
424:
423:
412:
411:
410:
409:
393:
392:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
368:
351:
350:
333:
303:
302:
280:
257:
256:
248:
238:Note to closer
234:
233:
204:Dr. Bobbie Fox
195:
194:
131:
72:
67:
56:
54:The Bushranger
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
506:
494:
492:
488:
483:
477:
476:
473:
470:
468:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
444:
443:
438:
434:
430:
425:
421:
419:
414:
413:
407:
403:
399:
394:
390:
388:
383:
382:
376:
373:
371:
366:
362:
358:
355:
354:
353:
352:
349:
345:
341:
340:Peterkingiron
337:
334:
332:
328:
324:
320:
318:
316:
314:
311:
308:
305:
304:
300:
296:
292:
286:
281:
278:
274:
270:
264:
259:
258:
255:
252:
245:
239:
236:
235:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
215:
214:
213:
209:
205:
201:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
59:One ping only
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
481:
478:
457:
453:
449:
445:
416:
385:
356:
335:
306:
237:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
49:
47:
31:
28:
429:Mark Arsten
398:Mark Arsten
161:free images
217:Link from
487:talk page
361:WP:AUTHOR
323:Arxiloxos
291:• Gene93k
269:• Gene93k
37:talk page
489:or in a
462:Ubelowme
458:NY Times
450:LA Times
418:Relisted
387:Relisted
365:Ubelowme
309:. GNews
223:AnonMoos
122:View log
39:or in a
357:Comment
336:Comment
167:WP refs
155:scholar
95:protect
90:history
139:Google
99:delete
243:Monty
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
446:Keep
433:talk
402:talk
344:talk
327:talk
321:. --
307:Keep
295:talk
273:talk
227:talk
219:Nape
208:talk
175:FENS
149:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
50:keep
454:BAR
249:845
189:TWL
124:•
120:– (
456:,
452:,
435:)
404:)
346:)
329:)
297:)
287:.
275:)
265:.
229:)
210:)
169:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
52:.
466:U
431:(
400:(
369:U
342:(
325:(
293:(
271:(
225:(
206:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.