Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Kim Hunt - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

166:. I don't think a mass nomination is appropriate because not all of these persons are on the same footing. In particular, it seems to me that Carpenter achieved bona fide renown and in addition was involved in more than one event likely covered by the press. My keep applies to Carpenter's article. In addition, I'd like to comment that I'm not sure I see how a list of non-notable people would be worthy of an article. If these articles are deleted, the newly created list article should also be deleted. Finally, I think the tactic being employed here is ill-advised and against the spirit of AfD. It creates a de facto referendum on whether content should be presented in one form or another instead of focusing debate on the suitability of content for this encyclopedia. AfD should be about content, not form. 320:- I have to agree that a mass nomination is not appropriate here. There is no question to me that Carpenter (since he was the first winner) and Olmstead (since he held a game show record for a few years) should have their own pages. While I'm not sure that each and every winner should have their own page, I do think every page should be decided individually.-- 186:
You can say what you want, but to be the first woman to do something, is notable (even if it's a bloody game show) I don't think a mass nomination is in order here either. There's at least two people in this list who deserve an article in my view and if someone doesn't deserve their own article, it
241:
the others. Carpenter's WWTBAM victory was very notable in it's own right, (citing press coverage.) The other winners may be notable enough to list, but not on their own page in my opinion. AfD Precedent says spelling bee winners et. al. are considered notable. It should be noted that Carpenter's
332:
I also agree mass nomination is inappropriate, and Carpenter and Olmstead should definitely be kept, with the others weakly kept. (Many of the articles include substantial information on the million-dollar question, which, in my view, is borderline encyclopedic.) I did suggest redirection for
295:
popular in its prime, and it has always had a good sense of its own history (compared to shows like Wheel of Fortune, which never talk about their past contestants). I think we can spare some space for every million-dollar winner.
204:. While Knowledge (XXG) isn't an indiscriminate source of information, neither is it a paper encyclopedia. Major winners of gameshows should be notable enough for inclusion. 354: 262:
is notable not only for winning the show, but for the fact for a long period he held the record for the highest winnings on a game show, and is also a founder of
338: 65: 52: 308:
Their 15 minutes of fame are over unless the TV exposure led to some notable carrer in movies, TV, or whatever which itself makes them notable.
333:
non-notable people (or, I should have implied, for biographies that don't state much more than what they are notable for) in the talk page for
98: 49: 370: 77: 73: 263: 17: 226:
After mulling over some more, I figure that since the entries would still be listed, it makes no major diifference. Changed vote to
76:
and copied the information in each article I've listed for deletion. If this nomination fails, then I request the removal of
389:
isn't like the other game shows, and as long as we don't start expanding to "500k winners," I think this will be fine. --
139: 413: 36: 287:
Cullen due to his success on multiple game shows (he was also part of Jeopardy's Ultimate Tournament of Champions);
119: 412:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
210: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
394: 184:(May 8, 2003) to win the top ($ 1,000,000) prize on the United States game show Who Wants to Be a Millionaire. 68:
in Who Wants to Be a Millionaire. While their achievements are notable in the scope of the show, in scope of
192: 390: 187:
doesn't neccesarily mean a list of WWTBAM winners is not notable. This needs a different approach. -
398: 377: 374: 361: 324: 312: 300: 270: 246: 222: 216: 194: 170: 157: 144: 89: 85: 321: 48:. Enough with the mass nominations. The next trainwreck I see like this will be speedily kept. 188: 104: 255: 114: 109: 267: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
346: 69: 167: 358: 350: 342: 259: 206: 124: 81: 297: 154: 129: 243: 275:
I vote keep for all (as independant articles) with varying levels of conviction.
309: 254:. Each article should have their notability judged individually. For example, 134: 72:
they are not. Since this is an important topic for the show, I have created a
334: 178:(nominate only the non-notables of the list). A spot check also produces 58: 345:, the first contestant of the US Millionaire (which I now brought up in 153:, per nom, unless one does something exceptional in the next few days. 64:
I am nominating a series of biographical articles. The articles are
406:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
279:
for Carpenter, as he was a genuine celebrity for a few months;
258:
is not notable for anything except winning on the show, while
341:
if article content was an issue. I recently redirected
291:
for all the rest. Who Wants to be a Millionaire was
371:
List of top winners in Who Wants to Be a Millionaire
78:
List of top winners in Who Wants to Be a Millionaire
74:
List of top winners in Who Wants to Be a Millionaire
242:
first AfD nomination resulted in a No Consensus. --
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 416:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 339:Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (US game show) 337:. Hunt could have been redirected to 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 283:Olmstead, for reasons listed above; 373:, if not already complete there. -- 264:National Academic Quiz Tournaments 24: 399:16:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC) 378:02:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC) 362:08:18, 17 September 2006 (UTC) 325:17:42, 16 September 2006 (UTC) 313:01:18, 16 September 2006 (UTC) 301:14:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 271:14:21, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 247:12:14, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 223:09:39, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 195:08:49, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 171:08:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 158:08:05, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 90:07:06, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 53:21:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC) 50:Can't sleep, clown will eat me 1: 237:the Carpenter page at least, 433: 355:UK version of Millioniare 349:), and I also redirected 80:as it will be redundant. 409:Please do not modify it. 94:The other articles are: 32:Please do not modify it. 180:Nancy Christy was the 66:Million Dollar Winners 397: 424: 411: 393: 219: 213: 34: 432: 431: 427: 426: 425: 423: 422: 421: 420: 414:deletion review 407: 217: 211: 88: 62: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 430: 428: 419: 418: 402: 401: 391:badlydrawnjeff 380: 375:FlyingPenguins 364: 351:Robert Brydges 343:David Korotkin 327: 315: 303: 273: 260:Kevin Olmstead 249: 198: 197: 173: 148: 147: 142: 137: 132: 127: 125:Kevin Olmstead 122: 117: 112: 107: 102: 99:John Carpenter 84: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 429: 417: 415: 410: 404: 403: 400: 396: 392: 388: 384: 381: 379: 376: 372: 368: 365: 363: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 331: 328: 326: 323: 319: 316: 314: 311: 307: 304: 302: 299: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 274: 272: 269: 265: 261: 257: 253: 250: 248: 245: 240: 236: 233: 232: 231: 229: 225: 224: 221: 220: 215: 214: 208: 203: 196: 193: 190: 185: 183: 177: 174: 172: 169: 165: 162: 161: 160: 159: 156: 152: 146: 145:Nancy Christy 143: 141: 138: 136: 133: 131: 130:Bernie Cullen 128: 126: 123: 121: 120:David Goodman 118: 116: 113: 111: 108: 106: 103: 100: 97: 96: 95: 92: 91: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 408: 405: 386: 382: 366: 329: 317: 305: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 268:Nonpareility 251: 238: 234: 227: 209: 205: 201: 200: 199: 181: 179: 175: 164:Keep/Comment 163: 150: 149: 93: 63: 45: 43: 31: 28: 387:Millionaire 277:Strong keep 182:first woman 140:Kevin Smith 105:Dan Blonsky 168:Erechtheus 135:Ed Toutant 359:Tinlinkin 289:weak keep 256:Bob House 115:Bob House 110:Joe Trela 101:(2nd Nom) 82:Mitaphane 383:Keep all 335:Kim Hunt 298:Zagalejo 202:Keep all 155:Jefffire 59:Kim Hunt 353:to the 322:Jatterb 306:Delete] 244:Roninbk 239:Listify 228:neutral 347:WP:RFD 310:Edison 293:really 151:Delete 70:WP:BIO 367:Merge 207:Brisv 16:< 395:talk 330:Keep 318:Keep 285:keep 281:keep 252:Keep 235:Keep 176:Keep 86:talk 46:keep 385:. 369:to 266:.-- 218:gas 189:Mgm 357:. 230:. 212:e 191:|

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Can't sleep, clown will eat me
21:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Kim Hunt
Million Dollar Winners
WP:BIO
List of top winners in Who Wants to Be a Millionaire
List of top winners in Who Wants to Be a Millionaire
Mitaphane
talk
07:06, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
John Carpenter
Dan Blonsky
Joe Trela
Bob House
David Goodman
Kevin Olmstead
Bernie Cullen
Ed Toutant
Kevin Smith
Nancy Christy
Jefffire
08:05, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Erechtheus
08:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Mgm

08:49, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Brisv

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.