Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Kim Kardashian effect - Knowledge

Source 📝

606:- Kim Kardashian is without a doubt an incredibly influential person on culture today, and numerous outlets have written about the effect she has on society. However, this does not mean that this effect itself can be synthesized into one overall phenomenon that can be considered independently notable of her as a topic.-- 725:- + "effect" just means "influence". Celebrities influence things. Style, fashion, culture, business, art, etc. This article is just about the influence of Kim Kardashian on a variety of different things. If you look for sources about that influence, you'll find plenty of them that 198:
Subject refers to a highly specific trend effect which is not notable and is likely original research; most references are not reliable and a quick web search provides mostly tabloid magazine or clickbait references to the subject.
167: 451: 256: 161: 120: 750: 236: 216: 778: 528:
Not notable and term used everywhere for click bait are mutually exclusive. The problem is finding the term explained from the 10,000 articles using the term.
368:. There's a multitude of sources that should provide more than enough proof of the subject's notability. It doesn't necessarily have to stay at this title. 564:
unreliable barometer of notability; anything that fosters the notion that the Kardashians are of lasting notability should be staked through the heart.
93: 88: 782: 448: 97: 127: 456:. (Bonus points for sources from many counties: United States, United Kingdom, Ireland, Lebanon, Australia) And some guy wrote a book about it 80: 385:- Notability isn't temporary. This is a term which will be forgotten in short order. Mentions in sources do not meet notability requirements. 540: 770: 668: 182: 442: 433: 56:, to leave history intact due to the interest in merging. Clear consensus is that this term does not warrant a standalone article. 149: 730: 17: 754: 634: 746: 729:
use the term "Kim Kardashian effect" despite talking about the same thing. "Kim Kardashian effect" is no more a thing than:
656:. Might be notable for Wiktionary, but some of the material might be nice for the corresponding section on her main page. 436: 709: 742: 143: 445: 806: 713: 696: 672: 640: 613: 596: 574: 552: 518: 490: 468: 454: 420: 396: 377: 360: 323: 296: 268: 248: 228: 208: 62: 786: 501: 278: 84: 762: 734: 139: 825: 481:
now? The book publisher, look at other books they've published, ebooks only and they only have a facebook page.--
457: 40: 738: 565: 464: 766: 356: 189: 705: 774: 460: 435:, is still used today, and will likely be used in the future. There's a decent source used in the article 821: 76: 68: 36: 799: 592: 486: 373: 319: 175: 155: 352: 693: 628: 548: 204: 57: 790: 662: 264: 244: 224: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
820:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
653: 610: 439: 794: 683: 649: 588: 482: 411: 405: 369: 340: 315: 311: 53: 758: 689: 622: 544: 429: 386: 348: 344: 336: 292: 200: 512: 478: 332: 310:
but nothing that is per se notable as something encyclopedic. Possible redirect to
260: 240: 220: 347:, I don't think several sources from fashion magazines/columns are enough to meet 114: 797:. Hm. I seem to have gone overboard. But this is a game you can play at home. — 607: 288: 307: 704:- Appears to have been a part of Kim K article which metastasized. 814:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
688:
said - reads like a section of the Kim Kardashian article. -
504:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
281:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
339:. The term would probably warrant a few sentences in the 408:, already reads much like a section from that article. 110: 106: 102: 174: 306:
it has a couple mentions in notable periodicals e.g.
257:
list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions
510:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 287:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 343:article, but hardly an article by itself. Being a 432:. The term has existed for more than seven years 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 828:). No further edits should be made to this page. 621:not well referenced enough or very encyclopedic 237:list of Internet-related deletion discussions 188: 8: 543:yields 0 results for "kim kardashian effect" 255:Note: This debate has been included in the 235:Note: This debate has been included in the 217:list of Fashion-related deletion discussions 215:Note: This debate has been included in the 254: 234: 214: 477:Entertainment columns about celebs are 535:I think it's more to do with lack of 7: 24: 769:(about his success in general), 749:(about social media influence), 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 777:(again, just her influence), 438:. And more that are not used 807:19:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC) 745:(on economic perspective), 714:04:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC) 697:03:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC) 673:22:29, 29 August 2015 (UTC) 641:20:20, 29 August 2015 (UTC) 614:23:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC) 597:06:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC) 579:Are we here to decide what 575:23:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC) 553:08:15, 24 August 2015 (UTC) 519:21:23, 23 August 2015 (UTC) 491:08:26, 24 August 2015 (UTC) 469:20:38, 23 August 2015 (UTC) 421:15:31, 23 August 2015 (UTC) 397:14:22, 22 August 2015 (UTC) 378:04:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC) 361:23:00, 15 August 2015 (UTC) 324:04:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC) 297:02:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC) 269:14:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC) 249:14:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC) 229:14:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC) 63:22:06, 31 August 2015 (UTC) 845: 209:07:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC) 781:(on business practices), 331:- most of it seems to be 817:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 741:(on tech consumerism), 787:Michael Jackson effect 541:google scholar search 539:sources. Eg. a quick 77:Kim Kardashian effect 69:Kim Kardashian effect 747:Justin Bieber effect 743:Justin Bieber effect 739:Justin Bieber effect 779:Taylor Swift effect 775:Taylor Swift effect 773:(about influence), 735:Paris Hilton effect 731:Paris Hilton effect 751:Jon Stewart effect 706:FreeatlastChitchat 48:The result was 763:Tom Cruise effect 737:(on baby names), 733:(on psychology), 521: 419: 299: 271: 251: 231: 61: 836: 819: 804: 802: 687: 659: 583:notable or what 572: 515: 509: 507: 505: 418: 416: 409: 393: 390: 286: 284: 282: 193: 192: 178: 130: 118: 100: 60: 34: 844: 843: 839: 838: 837: 835: 834: 833: 832: 826:deletion review 815: 800: 798: 791:Jay Leno effect 783:Skrillex effect 681: 671: 657: 569:Quis separabit? 566: 522: 513: 500: 498: 461:Rainbow unicorn 412: 410: 391: 388: 300: 277: 275: 135: 126: 91: 75: 72: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 842: 840: 831: 830: 810: 809: 801:Rhododendrites 757:, a different 716: 699: 675: 667: 650:Kim Kardashian 643: 616: 601: 600: 599: 558: 557: 556: 555: 530: 529: 508: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 472: 471: 423: 406:Kim Kardashian 399: 380: 363: 341:Kim Kardashian 326: 312:Kim Kardashian 285: 274: 273: 272: 252: 232: 196: 195: 132: 71: 66: 54:Kim Kardashian 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 841: 829: 827: 823: 818: 812: 811: 808: 803: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 776: 772: 768: 764: 760: 756: 752: 748: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 724: 721:or selective 720: 717: 715: 711: 707: 703: 700: 698: 695: 691: 685: 679: 676: 674: 670: 665: 664: 655: 651: 647: 644: 642: 638: 637: 632: 631: 626: 625: 620: 617: 615: 612: 609: 605: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 577: 576: 573: 571: 570: 563: 560: 559: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 533: 532: 531: 527: 524: 523: 520: 517: 516: 506: 503: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 475: 474: 473: 470: 466: 462: 458: 455: 452: 449: 446: 443: 440: 437: 434: 431: 427: 424: 422: 417: 415: 407: 403: 400: 398: 395: 394: 384: 381: 379: 375: 371: 367: 364: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 327: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 302: 301: 298: 294: 290: 283: 280: 270: 266: 262: 258: 253: 250: 246: 242: 238: 233: 230: 226: 222: 218: 213: 212: 211: 210: 206: 202: 191: 187: 184: 181: 177: 173: 169: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137:Find sources: 133: 129: 125: 122: 116: 112: 108: 104: 99: 95: 90: 86: 82: 78: 74: 73: 70: 67: 65: 64: 59: 58:Seraphimblade 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 816: 813: 795:Oprah effect 771:Jay-Z effect 767:Jay-Z effect 759:Apple effect 755:Apple effect 726: 722: 718: 701: 677: 663:BenLinus1214 661: 645: 635: 629: 623: 618: 611:(let's chat) 603: 587:be notable? 584: 580: 568: 567: 561: 536: 525: 511: 499: 425: 413: 401: 387: 382: 365: 328: 303: 276: 197: 185: 179: 171: 164: 158: 152: 146: 136: 123: 49: 47: 31: 28: 785:(on hair), 669:see my work 162:free images 660:(formerly 414:Sandstein 822:talk page 684:Sandstein 654:WP:WPINAD 589:Everyking 483:Savonneux 370:Everyking 345:neologism 316:Savonneux 261:• Gene93k 241:• Gene93k 221:• Gene93k 37:talk page 824:or in a 690:Fuzheado 624:Snuggums 545:Ljgua124 537:reliable 502:Relisted 428:- Meets 353:Daß Wölf 279:Relisted 201:Ljgua124 121:View log 50:redirect 39:or in a 680:- What 658:Johanna 562:Delete: 514:MBisanz 168:WP refs 156:scholar 94:protect 89:history 719:Delete 619:Delete 608:Yaksar 604:Delete 585:should 430:WP:GNG 383:Delete 349:WP:GNG 337:WP:SYN 329:Delete 308:Forbes 304:Delete 140:Google 98:delete 727:don't 723:Merge 702:Merge 678:Merge 648:with 646:Merge 636:edits 479:WP:RS 402:Merge 333:WP:OR 183:JSTOR 144:books 128:Stats 115:views 107:watch 103:links 16:< 710:talk 694:Talk 652:per 630:talk 593:talk 549:talk 526:Keep 487:talk 465:talk 426:Keep 392:5969 389:Onel 374:talk 366:Keep 357:talk 320:talk 293:talk 265:talk 245:talk 225:talk 205:talk 176:FENS 150:news 111:logs 85:talk 81:edit 805:\\ 404:to 314:?-- 289:Mz7 190:TWL 119:– ( 52:to 793:, 789:, 765:, 761:, 753:, 712:) 692:| 639:) 633:/ 595:) 581:is 551:) 489:) 467:) 459:. 453:, 450:, 447:, 444:, 441:, 376:) 359:) 351:. 322:) 295:) 267:) 259:. 247:) 239:. 227:) 219:. 207:) 170:) 113:| 109:| 105:| 101:| 96:| 92:| 87:| 83:| 708:( 686:: 682:@ 666:) 627:( 591:( 547:( 485:( 463:( 372:( 355:( 335:/ 318:( 291:( 263:( 243:( 223:( 203:( 194:) 186:· 180:· 172:· 165:· 159:· 153:· 147:· 142:( 134:( 131:) 124:· 117:) 79:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Kim Kardashian
Seraphimblade
22:06, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Kim Kardashian effect
Kim Kardashian effect
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Ljgua124
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.