211:
121:
169:
I saw those too, but just because somebody is interviewed on some website, it doesn't mean they're notable. I haven't seen any mainstream media or anything. --
160:
88:
83:
304:. If I was to vote first I'd go for a delete but looking at all the refrences and comments above - Ill stick to the pack. Weak Keep.
17:
92:
75:
235:
Found a few bits about her on the web that indicate some notability (albeit minor) within the profession. Borderline, but...
330:
36:
240:
284:
156:
329:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
189:
267:
312:
296:
272:
244:
226:
201:
178:
164:
137:
57:
236:
222:
152:
79:
260:
197:
174:
133:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
149:
306:
218:
292:
146:
google pulls up a handful of interviews that seem to be based around her newest movie:
71:
63:
193:
170:
129:
128:
Non-notable actress, has been in a few independent movies and that seems to be all
49:
109:
254:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
147:
288:
287:
local news article, but ultimately it's about the film rather than her.
192:, her movie, were created by the same person, who has no other edits. --
151:
and a little chatter about that movie. I'd say borderline notable.
323:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
212:
list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions
116:
105:
101:
97:
259:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
333:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
283:. There's a few bits and bobs about her in
210:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
350:
313:02:53, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
297:02:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
273:02:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
58:21:48, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
245:17:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
227:23:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
202:19:11, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
179:19:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
165:23:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
138:22:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
326:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
190:Under the Raven's Wing
281:Weakest of weak keeps
233:Very, Very Weak keep
311:
305:
275:
229:
215:
341:
328:
309:
270:
265:
258:
256:
237:New Kind Of Grey
216:
206:
119:
113:
95:
44:The result was
34:
349:
348:
344:
343:
342:
340:
339:
338:
337:
331:deletion review
324:
307:
268:
261:
252:
153:JeremyMcCracken
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
347:
345:
336:
335:
318:
316:
315:
299:
277:
276:
257:
249:
248:
247:
230:
204:
188:both this and
183:
182:
181:
126:
125:
72:Kimberly Amato
66:
64:Kimberly Amato
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
346:
334:
332:
327:
321:
320:
319:
314:
310:
303:
300:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:
278:
274:
271:
266:
264:
255:
251:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
231:
228:
224:
220:
213:
209:
205:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
167:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
148:
145:
142:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
325:
322:
317:
301:
280:
262:
253:
232:
207:
185:
143:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
308:Fattyjwoods
219:Fabrictramp
302:Weak keep
144:Weak keep
263:Krakatoa
161:contribs
122:View log
89:protect
84:history
50:Rjd0060
117:delete
93:delete
269:Katie
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
293:talk
289:PC78
285:this
241:talk
223:talk
208:Note
198:talk
186:Note
175:talk
157:talk
134:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
46:Keep
217:--
214:.
159:) (
295:)
243:)
225:)
200:)
194:AW
177:)
171:AW
163:)
136:)
130:AW
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
291:(
239:(
221:(
196:(
173:(
155:(
132:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.