445:
The sources that were used prior May 2011 were perhaps not good enough for a keep, but the articles which have been recently are fit to be considered reliable? Can it be confirmed that LA Times Blog, Central
Florida News 13, and VideoMaker Magazine are important newspapers? I have very little
480:
and his popularity was noted by multiple independent and reliable sources. I think this topic has potential to develop into something that says more about the world we live in. It is an interesting piece of information that enriches our coverage of the
Internet pop culture.
542:
It says that the
Youtube had frozen the count for a video that went "viral". Some web developers may consider web counters amateurish, so I am not exactly sure why a Youtube counter would be used as evidence. black
275:
I like Kip Kay's videos, and am a subscriber. All the same I have to be objective and say that most of the information in this article came from primary sources and this article looks promotional or fan-made to me.
178:
429:
exactly per
Blanchardb with the same reaction. In spite of the dead WSJ link which was probably good at the time, dedicated articles in other important newspapers assert notability. --
212:
314:
The information in this article is verifiable/expandable by using reliable secondary sources. Kip Kay seems to be an important internet personality. The article has potential.Stub? -
235:
139:
172:
499:
Okay. I did find an online NY Times article on Kip
Kedersha. I was going to demur on the Youtube count thing, but the source I found has a bias. black widow
525:
490:
414:
to the hangon rationale on the talk page. But my concerns have clearly been addressed after that, even if not by the people who replied to be. --
369:
327:
17:
338:
I feel it's important to note, if every "important" YouTuber were given a four sentence long article, WP would become quite a mess.
73:
463:
for that too, but I shouldn't worry, as I !voted 'keep', and it looks very much as if that will be the consensus here.
50:
534:
I should have made it more clear that I found two articles. Yes, you found the NY Times article. The other article is from
574:
36:
193:
112:
107:
521:
486:
365:
323:
160:
116:
477:
KipKay has almost million YouTube subscribers, his videos have racked up more than 235 million views on YouTube
573:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
539:
302:
99:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
548:
504:
451:
385:- significance as a (very) well-known internet publisher subtantiated by references from reliable sources.
356:
and that's important for this project. Knowledge (XXG) has a lot of short articles, people here call them
517:
482:
361:
319:
154:
63:
315:
343:
339:
281:
277:
262:
258:
150:
298:
186:
551:
529:
507:
494:
472:
454:
438:
421:
394:
373:
347:
331:
306:
285:
266:
250:
227:
81:
200:
468:
434:
390:
246:
223:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
357:
513:
58:
460:
353:
294:
446:
confidence "important newspapers" is the best description of those sources. black widow
166:
464:
430:
386:
242:
219:
103:
133:
478:
535:
406:, with blogs being the only sources. Although I felt it was not quite a
95:
87:
410:
candidate, I decided to leave the speedy deletion tag in place and
567:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
257:
Article is: Promotional, Stub, Mainly from primary sources
411:
403:
129:
125:
121:
185:
360:. They are entirely legitimate, as far as I know. --
213:
199:
402:When I first came across this article, it was in
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
577:). No further edits should be made to this page.
352:Works of this YouTuber were noted by multiple
236:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
8:
234:Note: This debate has been included in the
211:Note: This debate has been included in the
233:
210:
293:Has received significant coverage in
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
297:, noted in references section.
1:
594:
316:not a reason for deletion
570:Please do not modify it.
552:21:26, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
530:15:37, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
508:03:10, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
495:07:05, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
473:02:21, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
455:22:26, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
439:05:57, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
422:03:27, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
395:10:15, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
374:05:46, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
348:05:27, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
332:05:14, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
307:05:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
286:04:00, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
267:11:44, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
251:04:36, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
228:04:36, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
82:00:55, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
253:
239:
230:
216:
54:
51:non-admin closure
585:
572:
419:
412:leave a response
354:reliable sources
240:
217:
204:
203:
189:
137:
119:
79:
76:
68:
66:
61:
48:
44:The result was
34:
593:
592:
588:
587:
586:
584:
583:
582:
581:
575:deletion review
568:
538:and it is this
465:Kudpung ŕ¸ŕ¸¸ŕ¸ŕ¸ŕ¸śŕšŕ¸
431:Kudpung ŕ¸ŕ¸¸ŕ¸ŕ¸ŕ¸śŕšŕ¸
415:
243:Kudpung ŕ¸ŕ¸¸ŕ¸ŕ¸ŕ¸śŕšŕ¸
220:Kudpung ŕ¸ŕ¸¸ŕ¸ŕ¸ŕ¸śŕšŕ¸
146:
110:
94:
91:
80:
74:
71:
64:
59:
57:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
591:
589:
580:
579:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
442:
441:
424:
397:
379:
378:
377:
376:
335:
334:
309:
299:Chester Markel
288:
255:
254:
231:
207:
206:
143:
90:
85:
70:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
590:
578:
576:
571:
565:
553:
550:
546:
541:
537:
533:
532:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
510:
509:
506:
502:
498:
497:
496:
492:
488:
484:
479:
476:
475:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
457:
456:
453:
449:
444:
443:
440:
436:
432:
428:
425:
423:
418:
413:
409:
405:
401:
398:
396:
392:
388:
384:
381:
380:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
350:
349:
345:
341:
337:
336:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
310:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
289:
287:
283:
279:
274:
271:
270:
269:
268:
264:
260:
252:
248:
244:
237:
232:
229:
225:
221:
214:
209:
208:
202:
198:
195:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
152:
149:
148:Find sources:
144:
141:
135:
131:
127:
123:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
97:
93:
92:
89:
86:
84:
83:
77:
69:
67:
62:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
569:
566:
544:
514:this article
500:
447:
426:
416:
407:
399:
382:
311:
290:
272:
256:
196:
190:
182:
175:
169:
163:
157:
147:
56:
45:
43:
31:
28:
518:VejvanÄickĂ˝
483:VejvanÄickĂ˝
459:We have a
362:VejvanÄickĂ˝
320:VejvanÄickĂ˝
173:free images
417:Blanchardb
404:this shape
340:Eftertanke
278:Eftertanke
259:Eftertanke
461:guideline
420:-- timed
536:CNS News
526:contribs
491:contribs
370:contribs
328:contribs
140:View log
387:Opbeith
179:WPÂ refs
167:scholar
113:protect
108:history
96:Kip Kay
88:Kip Kay
512:Is it
408:speedy
273:Delete
151:Google
117:delete
60:maucho
543:widow
427:Keep.
400:Keep.
358:stubs
295:WP:RS
194:JSTOR
155:books
134:views
126:watch
122:links
65:eagle
46:keep.
16:<
549:Talk
540:one.
522:talk
516:? --
505:Talk
487:talk
469:talk
452:Talk
435:talk
391:talk
383:Keep
366:talk
344:talk
324:talk
318:. --
312:Keep
303:talk
291:Keep
282:talk
263:talk
247:talk
224:talk
187:FENS
161:news
130:logs
104:talk
100:edit
547:ex
503:ex
450:ex
201:TWL
138:â (
528:)
524:|
493:)
489:|
471:)
437:)
393:)
372:)
368:|
346:)
330:)
326:|
305:)
284:)
265:)
249:)
238:.
226:)
215:.
181:)
132:|
128:|
124:|
120:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
55:.
545:h
520:(
501:h
485:(
467:(
448:h
433:(
389:(
364:(
342:(
322:(
301:(
280:(
261:(
245:(
241:â
222:(
218:â
205:)
197:¡
191:¡
183:¡
176:¡
170:¡
164:¡
158:¡
153:(
145:(
142:)
136:)
98:(
78:)
75:c
72:(
53:)
49:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.