Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Kirepapa - Knowledge

Source 📝

288:; unnotable manga series by an unnotable author. A single short unnotable OVA adaptation nor a series of equally unnotable drama CDs are relatively irrelevant. The series has not received any significant coverage anywhere, the author is not notable, even its original publisher isn't notable, with only a handful of titles in its stable. -- 219:
Only one OVA and audio drama series. However, Knowledge bases notability on if the subject has received significant coverage by independent reliable sources. Simply being adapted into other media itself doesn't mean the manga is notable. Even
48:. Split !votes, but policy heavily favored those arguing delete. As always, I will be happy to userify this article for further improvement, and possible restoration if reliable sources showing notability appears. 152:
and trivial mention of the English language license. Although it was adapted into a direct-to-video anime, there is no indication that the anime ever received notice by reliable third-party sources either. See
320:
The book has been considered by reliable sources to have made a significant contribution to a notable motion picture, or other art form, or event or political or religious movement.
134: 198:- Basic common sense should dictate that companies do not go through the trouble and great expense to produce TWO OVAs and THREE drama CDs of a "non-notable" manga. 334:
notice of them has been found. That they exist is an indicator of notability, but does not demonstrate it to the letter of our guidelines.
301: 199: 17: 357: 101: 96: 58: 105: 268:
The subtle part was that OVA doesn't count. Anime adaptation with national broadcast does. Movie adaptation does.
383: 88: 36: 382:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
295: 347: 252: 203: 289: 154: 368: 351: 305: 272: 256: 235: 207: 190: 168: 92: 65: 247:
for being a manga AND an anime. Common sense over current rules for English language wikipedia.
231: 164: 178: 84: 71: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
343: 248: 54: 365: 269: 226: 186: 159: 145: 361: 339: 331: 315: 285: 221: 149: 141: 122: 311: 49: 327: 182: 181:
in hopes it will be developed. Author is probably notable per gsearch.
157:
for more details about the WikiProject's Aurora Publishing review.
314:
of the manga, its notability depends on the adaptations. Quoting
376:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
323: 356:
Releases date of the Drama CDs aren't sourced. I found that
129: 118: 114: 110: 78:
Discussion to run until at least 9 February 2009 (UTC)
148:. The work has received very little coverage from 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 386:). No further edits should be made to this page. 330:would have to be notable as well, and so far no 8: 310:Pending finding multiple reviews or other 7: 364:. Not enough to assert notability. 24: 155:WT:ANIME#Aurora Publishing review 144:manga by an author who is also 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 224:doesn't cross that bridge. -- 369:11:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 352:04:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC) 306:19:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 273:18:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 257:18:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 236:16:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 208:13:20, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 191:01:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 169:00:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC) 150:reliable third-party sources 66:03:31, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 403: 379:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 44:The result was 177:to the redlinked 63: 61:So let it be done 56: 394: 381: 292: 132: 126: 108: 59: 55: 34: 402: 401: 397: 396: 395: 393: 392: 391: 390: 384:deletion review 377: 290: 128: 99: 83: 75: 62: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 400: 398: 389: 388: 372: 371: 362:Kirepapa CD2 ? 354: 308: 278: 277: 276: 275: 260: 259: 241: 240: 239: 238: 211: 210: 193: 139: 138: 74: 69: 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 399: 387: 385: 380: 374: 373: 370: 367: 363: 359: 358:Kirepapa CD ? 355: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 322:That is, the 321: 317: 313: 309: 307: 303: 300: 297: 293: 287: 283: 280: 279: 274: 271: 267: 264: 263: 262: 261: 258: 254: 250: 246: 243: 242: 237: 233: 229: 228: 223: 218: 215: 214: 213: 212: 209: 205: 201: 197: 194: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 173: 172: 171: 170: 166: 162: 161: 156: 151: 147: 143: 136: 131: 124: 120: 116: 112: 107: 103: 98: 94: 90: 86: 82: 81: 80: 79: 73: 70: 68: 67: 64: 57: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 378: 375: 335: 319: 298: 291:Collectonian 281: 265: 244: 225: 216: 195: 174: 158: 140: 77: 76: 50: 45: 43: 31: 28: 344:Quasirandom 338:as failing 249:Dream Focus 200:159.182.1.4 146:non-notable 142:Non-notable 179:Ryô Takagi 366:KrebMarkt 360:and that 328:drama CDs 270:KrebMarkt 332:reliable 302:contribs 175:Redirect 135:View log 85:Kirepapa 72:Kirepapa 266:Comment 217:Comment 102:protect 97:history 336:Delete 312:notice 284:fails 282:Delete 130:delete 106:delete 51:Xymmax 46:delete 340:WP:BK 316:WP:BK 286:WP:BK 227:Farix 222:WP:BK 160:Farix 133:) – ( 123:views 115:watch 111:links 16:< 348:talk 326:and 318:C3: 296:talk 253:talk 245:Keep 232:Talk 204:talk 196:Keep 187:talk 165:Talk 119:logs 93:talk 89:edit 342:. — 324:OVA 183:JJL 350:) 304:) 255:) 234:) 206:) 189:) 167:) 121:| 117:| 113:| 109:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 346:( 299:· 294:( 251:( 230:( 202:( 185:( 163:( 137:) 127:( 125:) 87:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Xymmax

So let it be done
03:31, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Kirepapa
Kirepapa
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Non-notable
non-notable
reliable third-party sources
WT:ANIME#Aurora Publishing review
Farix
Talk
00:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Ryô Takagi
JJL
talk
01:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.