261:
that the current state of the article cannot be retained, not because it is unsourced, but because it is a knowing misrepresentation. I would personally prefer to keep an article, but if we cannot come to an agreement as to which documentation of his misdeeds is acceptable, deletion would have to be preferred.
260:
has in the course of all his removals completely whitewashed an article on a man whose name appears on pretty much every blog tracking medical scams and quackery, these being his only claims to noteriety. I am not up on exactly which of these has gained our respect, if any, but it is a leadpipe cinch
309:
Maybe you cannot, but I can and do make such an assessment, regardless of what I may write in
Knowledge. The lecture on policy notwithstanding, the current version is patently misleading to anyone who does a Google search on this guy. I did not register an opinion as to whether the article should be
292:
says to avoid self-published sources like blogs. Additionally our notability criteria requires that there be multiple, reliable secondary sources that cover the topic in depth for the article to remain. I cannot assess whether the article is an accurate representation of the BLP's reputation or
239:(my bad, this was an ad). Subject does not appear to have substantial coverage in independent sources. Prior AfDs appear to only barely have skid by on Keep and only because editors presumed it was well-sourced, when it actually only had primary sources.
353:: I've voted the other way before on the article because the argument for deletion was weak. This is a better argument. I've research press on the guy and have found almost nothing; there is nothing that shows the person as notable.
372:: Reviewed the contents of the AfDs plural. Reviewed the article itself. The only citation in the version I reviewed was being used to support a sentence with 2 claim elements - 1: that SU is unaccredited (which
190:
428:
88:
83:
511:
143:
384:
to the BLP. As such, the citation was misleading. Which leaves the rest of the article as a rickety tickety donkey bridge, except there is no donkey and no bridge.
184:
402:
310:
deleted because I am unsure whether his notoriety can be sourced to our standards; however, I would strenuously object to retaining it as it currently stands.
150:
235:
78:
376:
in the citation) and 2: that the subject of this BLP helped found SU (but I cant find where the source mentions the subject of this BLP
284:
says "Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public documents, to support assertions about a living person" and
477:
17:
116:
111:
523:
502:
483:
446:
420:
393:
362:
333:
319:
302:
270:
248:
61:
120:
205:
172:
103:
380:). I deleted the citation because it incompletely supported the text, particularly the element that might have been
233:
from the DA. After removing BLP violations, there were no sources left, and all I found in a Google News search was
541:
40:
222:
166:
389:
358:
537:
230:
36:
162:
329:
298:
281:
244:
107:
473:
432:
406:
285:
198:
212:
221:
I began removing poorly-sourced contentious material about this BLP, such as material cited to a
99:
67:
519:
498:
385:
354:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
536:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
315:
289:
266:
57:
325:
294:
257:
240:
226:
178:
463:
293:
conduct - I can only evaluate the application of
Knowledge's policies and guidelines.
515:
494:
137:
311:
262:
53:
288:
says to remove such content, even if it means violating the three-revert rule.
458:
530:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
429:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
133:
129:
125:
197:
512:
89:Articles for deletion/Klee Irwin (3rd nomination)
84:Articles for deletion/Klee Irwin (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
544:). No further edits should be made to this page.
211:
8:
510:Note: This debate has been included in the
427:Note: This debate has been included in the
401:Note: This debate has been included in the
457:: Per nom and other delete votes. Clearly
403:list of People-related deletion discussions
509:
426:
400:
76:
7:
74:
24:
493:: No evidence of notability. - -
79:Articles for deletion/Klee Irwin
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
324:We're in agreement then ;-)
62:16:08, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
524:02:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
503:16:41, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
484:14:21, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
447:23:48, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
421:23:47, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
394:23:07, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
363:18:58, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
334:17:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
320:17:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
303:16:55, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
271:15:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
249:08:55, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
561:
533:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
73:AfDs for this article:
229:from the SEC and a
48:The result was
526:
481:
449:
423:
552:
535:
471:
470:
468:
443:
440:
437:
417:
414:
411:
225:from the FDA, a
216:
215:
201:
153:
141:
123:
34:
560:
559:
555:
554:
553:
551:
550:
549:
548:
542:deletion review
531:
464:
462:
441:
438:
435:
415:
412:
409:
258:User:CorporateM
158:
149:
114:
98:
95:
93:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
558:
556:
547:
546:
527:
506:
505:
487:
486:
451:
450:
424:
397:
396:
366:
365:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
274:
273:
223:warning letter
219:
218:
155:
94:
92:
91:
86:
81:
75:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
557:
545:
543:
539:
534:
528:
525:
521:
517:
513:
508:
507:
504:
500:
496:
492:
489:
488:
485:
479:
475:
469:
467:
460:
456:
453:
452:
448:
445:
444:
430:
425:
422:
419:
418:
404:
399:
398:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
368:
367:
364:
360:
356:
352:
349:
348:
335:
331:
327:
323:
322:
321:
317:
313:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
300:
296:
291:
287:
283:
282:WP:BLPPRIMARY
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
272:
268:
264:
259:
256:
253:
252:
251:
250:
246:
242:
238:
237:
232:
231:press release
228:
224:
214:
210:
207:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
164:
161:
160:Find sources:
156:
152:
148:
145:
139:
135:
131:
127:
122:
118:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
90:
87:
85:
82:
80:
77:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
532:
529:
490:
465:
454:
434:
408:
386:FeatherPluma
381:
377:
373:
369:
355:Jeremy112233
350:
286:WP:BLPREMOVE
254:
234:
220:
208:
202:
194:
187:
181:
175:
169:
159:
146:
49:
47:
31:
28:
459:not notable
185:free images
326:CorporateM
295:CorporateM
241:CorporateM
236:this blurb
100:Klee Irwin
68:Klee Irwin
538:talk page
516:• Gene93k
466:Bill W.
290:WP:BLPSPS
37:talk page
540:or in a
382:relevant
227:document
144:View log
39:or in a
495:MrBill3
478:Contrib
255:Comment
191:WP refs
179:scholar
117:protect
112:history
491:Delete
455:Delete
433:Martin
407:Martin
378:at all
370:Delete
351:Delete
312:Mangoe
263:Mangoe
163:Google
121:delete
54:JohnCD
50:delete
461:. —
206:JSTOR
167:books
151:Stats
138:views
130:watch
126:links
16:<
520:talk
499:talk
476:) (
474:Talk
390:talk
359:talk
330:Talk
316:talk
299:Talk
267:talk
245:Talk
199:FENS
173:news
134:logs
108:talk
104:edit
58:talk
213:TWL
142:– (
522:)
514:.
501:)
482:—
431:.
405:.
392:)
374:is
361:)
332:)
318:)
301:)
269:)
247:)
193:)
136:|
132:|
128:|
124:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
60:)
52:.
518:(
497:(
480:)
472:(
442:1
439:5
436:4
416:1
413:5
410:4
388:(
357:(
328:(
314:(
297:(
265:(
243:(
217:)
209:·
203:·
195:·
188:·
182:·
176:·
170:·
165:(
157:(
154:)
147:·
140:)
102:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.