227:
I feel that she is notable, but I am not going to waist a lot of time arguing. If other editors comment they agree with deletion and no one wants to save it, I won't argue with a speedy deletion tag to speed it up. Make sure I am notified, because I want to make sure I save a copy of it for when
316:("Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions."). Her Adams Family role would be one, but I'm not sure this role in this movie would qualify as major to get her the multiple required.
299:
I hadn't seen this. A Google news search of her name and Will
Farrell only comes up with 4 blog-like hits and a search for her name and the name of the movie only comes up with two. And most of the coverage does not mention her at all
162:
197:. She is listed in some RSs as a member of a cast, but not discussed. As cited in the article, she was interviewed with another cast member of a musical in which she was (and may still be) performing in a
248:
117:
417:(in the "about" section, under "cast"). Despite Hullaballoo Wolfowitz's claim above, she does not appear to have the "female lead", somebody named Nicole Weaver appears to.
309:
156:
547:
274:. Aside from her other credits, she originated a principal role in a major Broadway musical, and she has the female lead in a heavily promoted, Will Farrell-produced,
543:
202:
369:", Ferrell is only involved with the film as a producer, so I would not necessarily expect articles about the film to mention both Rodriguez and Ferrell. --
312:
she is not a lead character (4 males are), but she is definitely in it (see the last paragraph). I'm not sure her role would qualify as a major role per
122:
90:
85:
305:
94:
77:
283:
177:
17:
144:
279:
138:
586:
36:
585:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
566:
551:
489:
388:
That is why I found it odd that I came up with even less hits when searching for her name and the movie title.
373:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
569:
529:
492:
477:
453:
426:
397:
376:
354:
325:
287:
263:
237:
222:
59:
134:
542:. There are sufficient sources out there to justify this article under the general notability criteria: see
525:
422:
393:
321:
218:
555:
473:
449:
350:
184:
81:
563:
486:
370:
170:
198:
512:
someday since she will probably get a major role in a film or another major theater role. But
521:
513:
418:
389:
317:
275:
259:
214:
150:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
559:
517:
469:
445:
436:
346:
337:
73:
65:
414:
301:
213:. She might be notable for WP purposes someday, but it doesn't look like she is there yet.
539:
233:
55:
516:
would seem to apply. Why not userfy the article? That way, if she subsequently meets
465:
410:
313:
210:
206:
194:
366:
255:
111:
509:
229:
409:- After doing more research into her one movie role, I do not think it meets
50:
520:, then it can come back. If she never does, then it stays off mainspace.
485:. I'm giving the subject the benefit of the doubt as to notability. --
439:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
340:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
504:
Per what policy or guideline? I would be willing to bet that she
278:
being released next week. There shouldn't be any WP:ENT issues.
579:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
413:. She is not listed as one of the five main characters on the
205:, but that and the cast listings doesn't seem to get her over
249:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
107:
103:
99:
169:
444:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
345:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
589:). No further edits should be made to this page.
365:. With regard to searching for her name with "
183:
8:
243:
247:: This debate has been included in the
7:
193:This broadway actor seems to fail
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
570:15:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
530:14:08, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
493:14:01, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
478:00:03, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
454:00:02, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
427:22:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
60:02:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
1:
398:13:35, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
377:01:11, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
355:00:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
326:21:36, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
288:21:10, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
264:01:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
238:20:27, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
223:20:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
302:Entertainment Weekly's blog
606:
554:. Also, you probably mean
582:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
462:Second relist rationale
306:a local NBC affiliate
280:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
415:film's official site
228:she's more notable.
464:. The article is a
44:The result was
552:The New York Post
456:
357:
310:According to this
266:
252:
597:
584:
443:
441:
344:
342:
253:
199:Time Out Chicago
188:
187:
173:
125:
115:
97:
74:Krysta Rodriguez
66:Krysta Rodriguez
34:
605:
604:
600:
599:
598:
596:
595:
594:
593:
587:deletion review
580:
434:
335:
130:
121:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
603:
601:
592:
591:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
564:Metropolitan90
556:WP:ENTERTAINER
533:
532:
496:
495:
487:Metropolitan90
480:
458:
457:
442:
431:
430:
429:
403:
402:
401:
400:
380:
379:
371:Metropolitan90
359:
358:
343:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
291:
290:
268:
267:
191:
190:
127:
123:AfD statistics
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
602:
590:
588:
583:
577:
571:
568:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
536:
535:
534:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
500:
499:
498:
497:
494:
491:
488:
484:
481:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
460:
459:
455:
451:
447:
440:
438:
433:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
405:
404:
399:
395:
391:
387:
384:
383:
382:
381:
378:
375:
372:
368:
364:
361:
360:
356:
352:
348:
341:
339:
334:
333:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
298:
295:
294:
293:
292:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
270:
269:
265:
261:
257:
250:
246:
242:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
225:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
124:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
581:
578:
548:Broadway.com
522:Novaseminary
505:
501:
482:
461:
435:
419:Novaseminary
406:
390:Novaseminary
385:
367:Will Ferrell
362:
336:
318:Novaseminary
296:
271:
244:
226:
215:Novaseminary
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
470:Ron Ritzman
446:Ron Ritzman
347:Ron Ritzman
157:free images
514:WP:CRYSTAL
560:WP:ARTIST
518:WP:ARTIST
276:Sony film
256:• Gene93k
544:Time Out
540:WP:BASIC
437:Relisted
338:Relisted
308:, e.g.)
118:View log
502:Comment
407:Comment
386:Comment
363:Comment
297:Comment
163:WP refs
151:scholar
91:protect
86:history
567:(talk)
558:, not
490:(talk)
411:WP:ENT
374:(talk)
314:WP:ENT
211:WP:GNG
207:WP:BIO
201:issue
195:WP:ENT
135:Google
95:delete
508:meet
230:JDDJS
178:JSTOR
139:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
48:. --
16:<
562:. --
538:Per
526:talk
510:WP:N
506:will
483:Keep
474:talk
468:. --
450:talk
423:talk
394:talk
351:talk
322:talk
284:talk
272:Keep
260:talk
245:Note
234:talk
219:talk
203:here
171:FENS
145:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
46:keep
466:BLP
254:--
185:TWL
120:•
116:– (
550:,
546:,
528:)
476:)
452:)
425:)
396:)
353:)
324:)
304:,
286:)
262:)
251:.
236:)
221:)
209:/
165:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
524:(
472:(
448:(
421:(
392:(
349:(
320:(
300:(
282:(
258:(
232:(
217:(
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.