690:
notability." If sources may encompass published works in all forms and media, then
Funimation's anime (with English cast credits) as well as their cast announcements should count as a sufficient source. Surely if the company who licensed the product and wrote an official blog post announcing the cast, that should be considered reliable? AngusWoof suggests the shows may be more notable if they weren't limited to Funimation's streaming website, however once again I'd like to point out that Sarah's page does not include any shows which have existed outside of DVD or Funimation's streaming site. Also to be noted that most of these shows are or will be available for purchase on DVD. So it's not limited to strictly online viewing. Upon further research I found that the game "88 Heroes", which Kristen provided voices in, is actually a console game which can be purchased on the PS4, which should help the notability factor that AngusWoof has requested. I will edit the page and make the changes you requested, but I would like to point out that it seems like the requirements change from voice actor to voice actor, which can be rather confusing.
376:] I know that animecons.com is not reliably updated and often sports outdated bios and even conventions, as there are several VAs who go to conventions that are not listed. For instance she has also been to Con Alt Delete in Chicago, Tokyo in Tulsa in Oklahoma, and GlitchCon in Arkansas, which are all cons outside of Texas. Hanabi Kawai and Chiyo Kurihara may be listed as "support" characters, but they are both integral characters who act as revolving plot devices in their respective shows. I don't think it's fair to say this actress is not notable just because these characters are not leads. They are significant parts regardless. I also found an article regarding not just her voice acting but also her drawing:
406:
titles she is a main in made it onto television networks or services such as Hulu/Netflix or is it all just on the very specialized
Funimation broadcast dubs? Arlington library writeup is promising. It's still kind of local but we need more sources that detail her career like that. I suggest the article be developed in Draft as a bare filmography supported halfway with cast announcements and the other half with self-pub / tweets isn't helping anyone for notability.
719:" argument). It basically comes down to Knowledge (XXG) being a volunteer-run project. Ultimately, a volunteer familiar with the guidelines needs to come across the page and apply the policy/guideline in order for it to be applied. If you've come across another article that doesn't meet notability criteria, you could tag it for deletion yourself, or eventually (possibly years later) someone else will (or perhaps by then the subject
737:
something like "significant coverage". People who opine here will, ideally, look for sources themselves and evaluate what's already linked here before making a decision. When the discussion is closed, the closing editor (typically an administrator) will evaluate the merits of the policy-based arguments to determine consensus on what to do. —
380:] She has also posted about being an ADR Director at FUNimation. She is consistently booking larger roles every season. You may feel that she is a not notable actress right now, but she is definitely up and coming. Also upon reviewing the Knowledge (XXG) Notability requirements, it says the following:
736:
independent of the subject. Sorry this is so confusing -- the deletion process on
Knowledge (XXG) can be messy. When it comes down to it, the best thing to do is just to link to books, articles, magazines, journals, newspapers, etc. in reliable sources that are independent of the subject and provide
268:
I have updated the page to adhere to
Knowledge (XXG)'s formatting standards and included multiple sources to confirm the information on this page. I used Justin Briner and Sarah Wiedenheft's pages as examples, both which seem to pass Knowledge (XXG)'s standards. I believe this person to be a notable
387:
It doesn't actually say anything about having to have a lead role. It just says significant. If a character is in more than half the series, I would say that is significant. IE - Hinano
Kurhashi from Assassination Classroom is in practically every episode of a 50+ episode series. Dolugh is in every
657:
is one of several more specific criteria that indicate when a subject is probably notable. It's not automatic, because we still need significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject on which to base the actual article. We're not imdb, so a list of credits and basic biographical
405:
Changed Dolugh ēlDLIVE An Onoya / ReLife and Chiyo / Prison School to main. Can you write into her biography about these roles and support this with reviews from secondary sources? That would help show she is getting significant roles. Also the
English dubs should be notable; have any of the
383:
Entertainers
Shortcuts: WP:ENT WP:ENTERTAINER WP:NACTOR WP:NMODEL Actors, voice actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and celebrities: Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Has a large fan base or a significant "cult"
689:
page: ""Reliable" means sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline. Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media, and in any language. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for
731:
sources can be used for some purposes (list to verify that a person was in a certain movie), but doesn't contribute to notability because notability is based on what people who have nothing to do with the subject say about her. (As an aside, for most purposes other than verifying basic data,
388:
episode of elDlive and is the driving force behind Chuta's super powers. An Onoya is part of the ReLIFE program and is in charge of making sure the lead stays on track with his program. What exactly does
Knowledge (XXG) constitute as a significant role?
685:. The standards do not seem to be universal. All of Sarah's sources come from the same sources I used, I know because I used Sarah's page as a template for making Kristen's. Upon looking on what counts as a reliable source I found the following from the
732:
secondary sources are preferred. We want to know what a professional critic thinks about a movie, for example, more than we want to know what the movie studio says about its own movie.) In other words, they need to be reliable
161:
357:
I think a real Otaku type would probably know better on whether or not those roles are supporting, but I do recognize Chiyo from Prison School as the main love interest, and I would call that a significant role.
329:. She has gotten on to several projects as a ADR Script writer so that might be promising. Can you find some news articles that talk about her and not just a passing mention or cast/convention announcement?
580:
460:
326:
Her anime convention appearances are mostly local to Texas. There are a few that are a litlte further out but just to NerdaCon in
Columbus, GA. and one visit to KuroNekoCon in Spokane, WA
520:
490:
723:
be notable). The standards are universal, but there aren't enough volunteers to apply them with perfect consistency. FWIW I've not looked at the other article at this point.
114:
620:
155:
681:
On the note of significant sources, I'd like to point out that there are pages which have not been targeted for deletion which have the same if not fewer sources. I.E.
269:
person, not just for acting, but also for their contribution in script writing and ADR directing, as well as being a published author in the comics and art industry.
600:
550:
430:
Yes, Otakus would know, but how would the general
Knowledge (XXG) reader know that if it isn't described? (and please do not bold the roles in the filmography)
384:
following. Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. See WP:MUSIC for guidelines on musicians, composers, groups, etc.
121:
230:
is an essay, not a policy, however, even that clarifies that subject specific criteria more likely apply here. In this case that would be
87:
82:
91:
17:
715:
What you're expressing is a common and valid frustration (common enough that there's a term for it, albeit somewhat dismissive: an "
653:. Importantly, none of the discussion about what's considered lead/significant roles matters if there's no significant coverage.
74:
566:
536:
506:
476:
443:
419:
342:
176:
143:
727:- This conflicts with another part of the same page which explains that the sources should be independent of the subject.
234:'s "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." or
767:
40:
725:
If sources may encompass published works in all forms and media, then Funimation's anime (with English cast credits)
137:
197:
226:: Saw a link to this page (not directly to the RFD) on Faecbook so I'm not voting, but I want to comment that
746:
699:
671:
638:
612:
608:
592:
588:
572:
542:
512:
482:
449:
425:
397:
367:
348:
265:
250:
218:
201:
133:
56:
716:
631:
763:
695:
393:
261:
36:
227:
183:
710:
691:
662:
independent of the subject that constitute significant coverage, we can say the subject is notable. —
389:
257:
78:
53:
728:
277:
739:
664:
560:
530:
500:
470:
437:
413:
336:
211:
193:
169:
654:
235:
604:
584:
363:
246:
626:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
762:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
658:
information isn't sufficient for the kind of article we want. In other words, if others find
327:
149:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
682:
238:. The question that may be appropriate then is how many is enough. To me, three = multiple.
686:
650:
319:
231:
70:
62:
659:
374:] Anime News Networks even says "Morgan Berry and Kristen McGuire star" in this article.
554:
524:
494:
464:
431:
407:
330:
318:
So nothing I see on ANN that shows she has a lead role that carries a program to meet
359:
242:
108:
372:
Dolugh and An Onoya are both listed as "Main" characters on MyAnimeList.
239:
756:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
210:: Sources are consistently unreliable and fails GNG and NACTOR.
286:
Assassination Classroom (TV) as Hinano Kurahashi - supporting
378:] As well as several pod-cast interviews such as this one:
581:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
461:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
289:
Castle Town Dandelion (TV) as Karen Ayugase - supporting
104:
100:
96:
168:
521:
list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions
182:
301:Mikagura School Suite (TV) as Yuriko - supporting
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
770:). No further edits should be made to this page.
491:list of Television-related deletion discussions
298:Keijo!!!!!!!! (TV) as Hanabi Kawai - supporting
310:Sky Wizards Academy (TV) as Beach - supporting
621:list of Americas-related deletion discussions
8:
619:Note: This debate has been included in the
599:Note: This debate has been included in the
579:Note: This debate has been included in the
549:Note: This debate has been included in the
519:Note: This debate has been included in the
489:Note: This debate has been included in the
459:Note: This debate has been included in the
649:- Not seeing sufficient sources to satisfy
304:Prison School (TV) as Chiyo Kurihara - main
618:
601:list of Women-related deletion discussions
598:
578:
551:list of Texas-related deletion discussions
548:
518:
488:
458:
295:Fuuka (TV) as Chitose Haruna - supporting
313:Yuri!!! on Ice (TV) as Loop - supporting
724:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
307:ReLIFE (TV) as An Onoya - main
1:
292:ēlDLIVE (TV) as Dolugh - main
787:
747:13:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
700:04:52, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
672:20:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
573:03:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
543:03:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
513:03:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
483:03:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
450:16:37, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
426:16:24, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
398:10:24, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
368:18:28, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
349:03:45, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
266:22:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
251:00:06, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
57:15:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
639:20:40, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
613:23:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
593:23:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
219:01:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
202:23:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
759:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
192:Non-notable actress.
717:other stuff exists
557:
527:
497:
467:
434:
410:
333:
641:
615:
595:
575:
555:
545:
525:
515:
495:
485:
465:
432:
408:
331:
54:Black Kite (talk)
778:
761:
744:
742:
714:
683:Sarah Wiedenheft
669:
667:
660:reliable sources
636:
634:
629:
569:
563:
539:
533:
509:
503:
479:
473:
446:
440:
422:
416:
345:
339:
216:
187:
186:
172:
124:
112:
94:
34:
786:
785:
781:
780:
779:
777:
776:
775:
774:
768:deletion review
757:
740:
738:
708:
665:
663:
632:
627:
625:
567:
561:
537:
531:
507:
501:
477:
471:
444:
438:
420:
414:
343:
337:
212:
129:
120:
85:
71:Kristen McGuire
69:
66:
63:Kristen McGuire
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
784:
782:
773:
772:
752:
751:
750:
749:
741:Rhododendrites
703:
702:
675:
674:
666:Rhododendrites
643:
642:
616:
596:
576:
546:
516:
486:
455:
454:
453:
452:
428:
352:
351:
323:
322:
315:
314:
311:
308:
305:
302:
299:
296:
293:
290:
287:
284:
256:
254:
253:
221:
214:KGirlTrucker81
194:Therainbowsend
190:
189:
126:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
783:
771:
769:
765:
760:
754:
753:
748:
743:
735:
730:
726:
722:
718:
712:
707:
706:
705:
704:
701:
697:
693:
688:
684:
680:
677:
676:
673:
668:
661:
656:
652:
648:
645:
644:
640:
637:
635:
630:
622:
617:
614:
610:
606:
605:Coolabahapple
602:
597:
594:
590:
586:
585:Coolabahapple
582:
577:
574:
570:
564:
558:
552:
547:
544:
540:
534:
528:
522:
517:
514:
510:
504:
498:
492:
487:
484:
480:
474:
468:
462:
457:
456:
451:
447:
441:
435:
429:
427:
423:
417:
411:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
395:
391:
385:
381:
379:
377:
375:
373:
370:
369:
365:
361:
356:
350:
346:
340:
334:
328:
325:
324:
321:
317:
316:
312:
309:
306:
303:
300:
297:
294:
291:
288:
285:
283:
282:Move to draft
279:
275:
272:
271:
270:
267:
263:
259:
252:
248:
244:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
222:
220:
217:
215:
209:
206:
205:
204:
203:
199:
195:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
123:
122:McGuire Stats
119:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
758:
755:
733:
720:
678:
646:
628:CAPTAIN RAJU
624:
386:
382:
371:
354:
353:
281:
273:
255:
223:
213:
207:
191:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
117:
49:
47:
31:
28:
711:MissyGraham
692:MissyGraham
390:MissyGraham
274:Weak delete
258:MissyGraham
228:WP:GNGACTOR
156:free images
278:WP:TOOSOON
764:talk page
655:WP:NACTOR
556:AngusWOOF
526:AngusWOOF
496:AngusWOOF
466:AngusWOOF
433:AngusWOOF
409:AngusWOOF
332:AngusWOOF
240:IMDB Link
236:WP:ARTIST
37:talk page
766:or in a
360:Kopf1988
243:Kopf1988
115:View log
39:or in a
729:Primary
679:Comment
355:Comment
224:Comment
162:WP refs
150:scholar
88:protect
83:history
687:WP:GNG
651:WP:GNG
647:Delete
320:WP:ENT
232:WP:ENT
208:Delete
134:Google
92:delete
50:delete
568:sniff
538:sniff
508:sniff
478:sniff
445:sniff
421:sniff
344:sniff
177:JSTOR
138:books
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
721:will
696:talk
609:talk
589:talk
562:bark
532:bark
502:bark
472:bark
439:bark
415:bark
394:talk
364:talk
338:bark
276:per
262:talk
247:talk
198:talk
170:FENS
144:news
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
745:\\
734:and
670:\\
633:(✉)
396:)
280:or
184:TWL
113:– (
52:.
698:)
623:.
611:)
603:.
591:)
583:.
571:)
565:•
553:.
541:)
535:•
523:.
511:)
505:•
493:.
481:)
475:•
463:.
448:)
442:•
424:)
418:•
366:)
347:)
341:•
264:)
249:)
200:)
164:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
713::
709:@
694:(
607:(
587:(
559:(
529:(
499:(
469:(
436:(
412:(
392:(
362:(
335:(
260:(
245:(
196:(
188:)
180:·
174:·
166:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
136:(
128:(
125:)
118:·
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.