363:
Since "notable" is defined as " "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice". The fact that over a dozen junior league teams now exist in
Missouri due to the efforts of the Priory Rugby Club, I hope this would qualify it as having had a demonstrable effect on athletics and education (granted, ony
274:
Point taken. But doesn't its long-standing status (and the fact that it has been modified/expanded over 500 times) suggest that it might be a helpful article to some? I might also add that this particular team was the first junior rugby team established in
Missouri and is one of only three teams in
314:
I have used this article many times to research the history of Saint Louis Priory School's Rugby Team. It has helped my personal growth and education and increased my knowledge of competetive high school rugby teams. I have sent links to it out to colleagues referencing it, and I have quoted it in
230:
If I may add one further thought...the
Knowledge (XXG) policy, as I understand it, is only to recommend articles for deletion that have been "RECENTLY ADDED." Since this particular article has been around for so long, modified and expanded so many times, and used by so many, I question whether it
214:
Please do not delete this article. It has been on
Knowledge (XXG) for over a year now, and has been heavily used. Do look up the team on Google, Answers.com, etc. The team is especially significant as a landmark in the history of Missouri rugby, and its tournament has deep historical roots as
302:
The so-called "Jeromans" is a team of no historical or cultural significance whatsoever. I don't know what their arguments may be for writing such an article, but it can (and has been) argued that the Kwai Nyu Rugby Team is a cultural, athletic, and historical landmark, especially for people
215:
well. The team itself has a fascinating history, and its web site is extremely helpful for teaching rugby. As the article in
Knowledge (XXG) has been up for a year now, some users have grown rather dependent on it. I would deeply appreciate your reconsidering this recommendation.
154:
rugby team with rich history, part of saint louis priory school, no reason it should be deleted; various people keep adding themselves to the list of players, and make them sound like the best players in the world; i will ask them to stop if it is absolutley necessary
275:
the world that bears the coat of arms of
Westminster Abbey. As such, it may be considered to have historical significance. Also, in case the term "club" is putting anyone off, all rugby "teams" are referred to as "clubs."
364:
on a regiona level). Does this help? I don't mean to be pushy, but I'd like to see the article stick around (not a reason for keeping it around, obviously, but at leas it explains my motivation...)
254:
does it say that only recently created articles can be nominated. The fact that it has been on
Knowledge (XXG) for over a year also has no bearing on this; arguments for keeping should establish
353:
352:
Very well. At least one published literary source mentions the Priory Rugby Club by name as the oldest and most accomplished junior rugby team in
Missouri (see "In Good Soil":
110:
303:
interested in the history of rugby in North
America. Note also that a search for "Priory Rugby" will yield more information and external sources conserning the team
315:
coversation. In brief, it has achieved exactly what
Knowledge (XXG) articles are meant to, and should remain as an integral part of the Knowledge (XXG) system.
181:
354:
http://www.amazon.com/Good-Soil-Founding-Priory-1954-1973/dp/0966210417/ref=sr_1_1/002-8021912-0026420?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1178681222&sr=1-1
158:
83:
78:
87:
162:
70:
17:
400:
36:
385:
338:
292:
279:
268:
241:
223:
204:
188:
170:
149:
121:
117:
Prep High School rugby team. Only source is primary. Google search comes up with wiki, wiki mirrors, and youtube.
52:
399:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
166:
74:
372:
285:
No. Its long standing status just means no one noticed it until now. Nothing links to it except the school
66:
58:
202:
49:
288:. I happened to bump into it when someone created the another article for the school's frisbee team.
286:
329:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
383:
336:
266:
376:
255:
251:
259:
131:
289:
199:
185:
118:
371:
The definition of 'notable' Knowledge (XXG) uses has a more precise definition; see
365:
304:
276:
238:
220:
104:
380:
333:
263:
130:
High-school sports team. Surely could have been speedied as a A7/nn-group.
262:
and not focus on the article's age or how useful the team's website is.
328:
Please base reasons off of Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines;
393:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
319:
Respectfully submitted, Jon M. Tottleben Bronx-Lebanon Hospital
100:
96:
92:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
403:). No further edits should be made to this page.
182:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Jeromans
8:
332:is not a good reason to keep an article.
377:notability criteria for organizations
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
252:the Articles for deletion process
1:
231:even qualifies for deletion.
219:Fr. Augustine Wetta, O.S.B.
237:Fr. Augustine Wetta, O.S.B.
198:per lack of notability. --
420:
373:Knowledge (XXG):Notability
396:Please do not modify it.
234:Respectfully submitted,
32:Please do not modify it.
386:04:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
339:17:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
293:13:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
280:12:39, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
269:22:04, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
250:Nowhere in the page on
242:21:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
224:21:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
205:13:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
189:12:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
171:23:14, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
150:14:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
122:03:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
53:11:48, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
161:comment was added by
375:, specifically, the
184:of the same school.
67:Kwai Nyu Rugby Club
59:Kwai Nyu Rugby Club
226:Saint Louis Abbey
174:
411:
398:
260:reliable sources
156:
147:
144:
141:
138:
108:
90:
34:
419:
418:
414:
413:
412:
410:
409:
408:
407:
401:deletion review
394:
157:—The preceding
145:
142:
139:
136:
81:
65:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
417:
415:
406:
405:
389:
388:
361:
360:
359:
358:
344:
343:
342:
341:
317:
316:
308:
307:
296:
295:
272:
271:
229:
217:
216:
208:
207:
192:
191:
175:
163:69.150.181.111
152:
132:Andrew Lenahan
115:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
416:
404:
402:
397:
391:
390:
387:
384:
382:
378:
374:
370:
369:
368:
367:
357:
355:
351:
348:
347:
346:
345:
340:
337:
335:
331:
327:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
313:
312:DO NOT DELETE
310:
309:
306:
301:
298:
297:
294:
291:
287:
284:
283:
282:
281:
278:
270:
267:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
246:
245:
244:
243:
240:
235:
232:
227:
225:
222:
213:
212:DO NOT DELETE
210:
209:
206:
203:
201:
197:
194:
193:
190:
187:
183:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
153:
151:
148:
133:
129:
128:Strong delete
126:
125:
124:
123:
120:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
395:
392:
362:
356:
349:
325:
318:
311:
299:
273:
247:
236:
233:
228:
218:
211:
195:
177:
135:
127:
116:
45:
43:
31:
28:
330:usefulness
256:notability
180:See also
290:ccwaters
200:lucasbfr
186:ccwaters
159:unsigned
119:ccwaters
111:View log
366:KwaiNyu
350:Comment
326:Comment
305:KwaiNyu
300:Comment
277:KwaiNyu
239:KwaiNyu
221:KwaiNyu
178:Comment
84:protect
79:history
381:Veinor
334:Veinor
264:Veinor
258:using
248:Delete
196:Delete
88:delete
46:DELETE
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
167:talk
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
143:bli
109:– (
50:Doc
48:. -
379:.
169:)
146:nd
140:ar
137:St
134:-
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
173:.
165:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.