417:
to be notable. I'd be amazed if sufficent sources didn't exist on this industrial-era
British warship to get it across the notability threshold without too much effort. From the way in which the nomination is written it would seem that no check for sources was conducted before nominating this article
522:
following types of units and formations are likely, but not certain, to have such coverage and therefore likely, but not certain, to be suitable for inclusion: 4.Warships, including submarines, commissioned in recognised naval forces. Examples include HMAS Sydney, USS Enterprise and SMS Blücher....
521:
As for any subject on
Knowledge (XXG), presumption of notability for a military unit or formation depends wholly on the existence of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. The consensus within the Military history WikiProject is that the
152:
481:
I grow tired of these repeated AfDs for commissioned warships. They're worthy of inclusion even if they're only a single line stub. A less than ideal situation, but worthy nonetheless.--
331:
209:
Yet another AFD from my own personal wikipedia stalker, how wonderful. I am still looking for sources, currently I am finding and using sources for another article I created today
525:
This ship fails the test. As a small ship that was in service for a short period during which the Royal Navy was not engaged in war, it is unlikely to have drawn any attention.
146:
113:
304:
358:
584:
threshold of 100/100. As a commissioned warship of the Royal Navy, it is notable enough to sustain an article. Coverage in at least two books means it passes
86:
81:
90:
73:
392:
to establish notability: did the nominator check them? And yes, it's probably better to work on this sort of article in userspace first.
167:
134:
17:
397:
251:
And you ought not continue your battlefield conduct in following me around, I am quite sure there is a rule against such.
128:
546:
A poorly thought out nomination, with no apparent attempt to see whether or not any attention was drawn to this vessel.
612:
36:
469:
393:
233:
you create articles. And since you had not established notability when you created the article, you should not have
183:
No evidence provided for the notability of this Royal Navy ship, which was one of seven ships of the same name. The
124:
597:
572:
555:
538:
507:
490:
473:
444:
427:
401:
377:
350:
323:
295:
260:
246:
222:
200:
55:
534:
242:
196:
77:
174:
611:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
486:
465:
256:
218:
184:
140:
530:
503:
238:
210:
192:
69:
61:
515:
453:
410:
160:
568:
482:
371:
344:
317:
581:
529:
is a link to a picture of another corvette commissioned at the same time and now in a museum.
593:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
49:
440:
423:
252:
214:
585:
457:
551:
526:
499:
461:
564:
366:
339:
312:
188:
52:
589:
107:
436:
419:
274:
547:
435:- You have made a good argument for improvement but a poor one for deletion.--
272:
no indication of notability right now. Use your 7 days to find some :)
413:(which is an essay but widely accepted) commissioned warships are
605:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
234:
103:
99:
95:
159:
388:
There are probably enough references in Google Books
332:
list of United
Kingdom-related deletion discussions
173:
213:an am expanding both articles as I find sourcing.
418:for deletion - this is really unhelpful conduct.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
615:). No further edits should be made to this page.
498:. Warships are generally held to be notable. --
563:per "keep" comments above. Notability exists. —
456:, furthermore article subject appears to pass
191:, provides more information than the article.
305:list of Military-related deletion discussions
8:
359:list of History-related deletion discussions
357:Note: This debate has been included in the
330:Note: This debate has been included in the
303:Note: This debate has been included in the
356:
329:
302:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
460:via multiple mentions in various
237:before you had established it.
229:You should determine notability
580:- The ship easily exceeds the
1:
632:
598:06:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
573:01:28, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
556:01:24, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
539:00:15, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
508:23:54, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
491:01:20, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
474:23:34, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
445:23:09, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
428:21:53, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
402:21:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
378:21:36, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
351:21:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
324:21:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
296:21:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
261:18:43, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
247:18:02, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
235:removed the notability tag
223:17:50, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
201:17:38, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
56:06:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
608:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
524:
394:Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus
519:
390:"HMS Constance" 1880
211:HMS Constance (1846)
70:HMS Constance (1880)
62:HMS Constance (1880)
44:The result was
466:RightCowLeftCoast
380:
362:
353:
335:
326:
308:
623:
610:
462:reliable sources
374:
369:
363:
347:
342:
336:
320:
315:
309:
294:
292:
289:
286:
283:
280:
277:
178:
177:
163:
111:
93:
34:
631:
630:
626:
625:
624:
622:
621:
620:
619:
613:deletion review
606:
372:
367:
345:
340:
318:
313:
290:
287:
284:
281:
278:
275:
273:
120:
84:
68:
65:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
629:
627:
618:
617:
601:
600:
575:
558:
541:
510:
493:
476:
447:
430:
404:
382:
381:
354:
327:
299:
298:
266:
265:
264:
263:
226:
225:
185:disambiguation
181:
180:
117:
64:
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
628:
616:
614:
609:
603:
602:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
578:Snowball keep
576:
574:
570:
566:
562:
559:
557:
553:
549:
545:
542:
540:
536:
532:
528:
523:
517:
514:
511:
509:
505:
501:
497:
494:
492:
488:
484:
483:Sturmvogel 66
480:
477:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
448:
446:
442:
438:
434:
431:
429:
425:
421:
416:
412:
408:
405:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
384:
383:
379:
376:
375:
370:
360:
355:
352:
349:
348:
343:
333:
328:
325:
322:
321:
316:
306:
301:
300:
297:
293:
271:
268:
267:
262:
258:
254:
250:
249:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
227:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
204:
203:
202:
198:
194:
190:
189:HMS Constance
186:
176:
172:
169:
166:
162:
158:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
126:
123:
122:Find sources:
118:
115:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
66:
63:
60:
58:
57:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
607:
604:
577:
560:
543:
520:
512:
495:
478:
449:
432:
414:
406:
389:
385:
365:
338:
311:
269:
230:
206:
182:
170:
164:
156:
149:
143:
137:
131:
121:
45:
43:
31:
28:
253:Tentontunic
215:Tentontunic
147:free images
516:WP:MILUNIT
500:Necrothesp
454:WP:MILUNIT
411:WP:MILUNIT
582:WP:SHIPS
565:Diiscool
114:View log
590:Mjroots
513:Comment
415:assumed
386:Comment
153:WP refs
141:scholar
87:protect
82:history
50:WP:SNOW
586:WP:GNG
458:WP:GNG
452:- per
437:Ykraps
420:Nick-D
270:Delete
231:before
187:page,
125:Google
91:delete
548:Benea
518:says:
168:JSTOR
129:books
108:views
100:watch
96:links
16:<
594:talk
569:talk
561:Keep
552:talk
544:Keep
535:talk
527:Here
504:talk
496:Keep
487:talk
479:Keep
470:talk
464:. --
450:Keep
441:talk
433:Keep
424:talk
409:per
407:Keep
398:talk
257:talk
243:talk
219:talk
207:Keep
197:talk
161:FENS
135:news
104:logs
78:talk
74:edit
46:keep
531:TFD
373:466
364:--
346:466
337:--
319:466
310:--
239:TFD
193:TFD
175:TWL
112:– (
596:)
588:.
571:)
554:)
537:)
506:)
489:)
472:)
443:)
426:)
400:)
368:JN
361:.
341:JN
334:.
314:JN
307:.
259:)
245:)
221:)
199:)
155:)
106:|
102:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
80:|
76:|
53:Ed
48:.
592:(
567:(
550:(
533:(
502:(
485:(
468:(
439:(
422:(
396:(
291:3
288:8
285:F
282:J
279:T
276:C
255:(
241:(
217:(
195:(
179:)
171:·
165:·
157:·
150:·
144:·
138:·
132:·
127:(
119:(
116:)
110:)
72:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.