480:
since nothing is verified. The school doesn't appear to have a website; the only link provided is to a convent (which is where all the cheerleading about beatification is located). (BTW there appear to be dozens of schools, in different parts of the
Philippines, called Holy Rosary Academy.) We do try
432:
It isn't an article about a school, it's an advertisement for a religious institution and the beatification of one of their sisters. I can't find information about a school on their website, certainly nothing about a high school (the policy you are referring to says that generally high schools and up
414:
The article is about a school, and schools are generally notable. The article is written very bad, and the whole thing is unencyclopedic. However, instead of deleting it, we can put this whole thing together by rewriting it, or sourcing it if possible. You know, there are lots of school articles in
257:
Directly copied no, poorly written and/or ESL, yes. This is full of personal opinion, sections written as advertisements, and still is not properly sourced. The one existing source is a self-source, which doesn't really count. A lot of people see ESL (English as a Second
Language) writing and think
475:
Unverified. There is absolutely no solid information at the article worth retaining - not even an address - and I could find nothing solid on the web. I couldn't even find out whether it is a secondary school (which are generally kept per
Knowledge consensus) or an elementary school (which are
287:
I'm undecided with this one. As it is, the article definitely is not encyclopedic and would need a serious rewrite. I'm not convinced by the nominators rationale that it is advertising (if it were, it could be speedied). Most likely it was a new contributor who didn't understand how to format
160:
234:
Really? Because one of the links is dead and the other one comes up with a web site that does not have the word for word information this article does. Can you quote a specific URL where you found the copyright infringement?
209:
The sources he used are at the bottom, just remove the word template and you have a functional web address. That being said, the sources are inadequate and the subject fails multiple policies, including
154:
88:
83:
92:
75:
191:
This appears to be (a) blatant advertising (written in the first person) (b) unsourced (and I can't find any) and (c) directly copied from something (but I can't find what).
115:
364:
120:
453:
Tell me, where can I find a specific part that justifies the claim that it's about the beatification of one of their sisters. Or am I skipping some part of the text?--
390:
175:
142:
136:
490:
461:
448:
423:
405:
379:
354:
343:
334:
305:
273:
244:
229:
200:
57:
132:
182:
79:
17:
71:
63:
148:
292:
asserts that this academy was only "the second
Filipino congregation of nuns founded in the Philippines" in 1925. That
314:
505:
36:
504:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
441:
266:
222:
289:
53:
296:
be notable and someone who knows more about
Catholic affairs than me should probably comment on this.
301:
240:
168:
486:
435:
318:
260:
216:
196:
477:
401:
375:
350:
330:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
49:
317:
on
Enlgish Knowledge, this is beyond an ugly mess. It is a stub about a Catholic school
258:
it's copied from somewhere. I don't see copied text, but the other issues do concern me.
297:
236:
482:
322:
192:
397:
371:
346:
326:
109:
481:
to keep articles about high schools, but there is nothing here worth keeping. --
211:
455:
417:
476:
generally merged to the locality). In this case, I wouldn't even merge to
498:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
342:
obviously copy and paste. but 1 gnews hit doesn't cut it
415:
Knowledge that are sourced, yet they are existing here.
105:
101:
97:
167:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
508:). No further edits should be made to this page.
365:list of Philippines-related deletion discussions
433:are notable, while middle and below are not)
181:
8:
391:list of Schools-related deletion discussions
385:
359:
315:I am a big booster of Phillipines articles
389:: This debate has been included in the
363:: This debate has been included in the
72:HOLY ROSARY ACADEMY, MOLO, ILOILO CITY
64:HOLY ROSARY ACADEMY, MOLO, ILOILO CITY
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
491:21:26, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
462:12:19, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
449:01:22, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
424:17:38, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
406:16:30, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
380:16:30, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
355:01:23, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
335:00:17, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
306:22:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
274:23:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
245:22:30, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
230:22:23, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
201:20:19, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
58:00:09, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
525:
321:an advertisement for the
501:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
478:Molo, Iloilo City
408:
394:
382:
368:
516:
503:
458:
447:
438:
420:
395:
369:
272:
263:
228:
219:
186:
185:
171:
123:
113:
95:
34:
524:
523:
519:
518:
517:
515:
514:
513:
512:
506:deletion review
499:
456:
446:
436:
434:
418:
325:of a late nun.
271:
261:
259:
227:
217:
215:
128:
119:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
522:
520:
511:
510:
494:
493:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
440:
427:
426:
409:
383:
357:
337:
319:that is really
308:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
265:
250:
249:
248:
247:
221:
189:
188:
125:
121:AfD statistics
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
521:
509:
507:
502:
496:
495:
492:
488:
484:
479:
474:
471:
470:
463:
460:
459:
452:
451:
450:
445:
444:
439:
437:Sven Manguard
431:
430:
429:
428:
425:
422:
421:
413:
410:
407:
403:
399:
392:
388:
384:
381:
377:
373:
366:
362:
358:
356:
352:
348:
344:
341:
338:
336:
332:
328:
324:
323:Beatification
320:
316:
312:
309:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
286:
283:
282:
275:
270:
269:
264:
262:Sven Manguard
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
246:
242:
238:
233:
232:
231:
226:
225:
220:
218:Sven Manguard
213:
208:
205:
204:
203:
202:
198:
194:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
500:
497:
472:
454:
442:
416:
411:
386:
360:
339:
310:
293:
290:This article
284:
267:
223:
206:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
45:
43:
31:
28:
155:free images
50:Ron Ritzman
288:articles.
398:• Gene93k
372:• Gene93k
298:Redfarmer
237:Redfarmer
483:MelanieN
313:- While
285:Comment:
116:View log
412:Comment
347:LibStar
327:Bearian
161:WP refs
149:scholar
89:protect
84:history
473:Delete
340:Delete
311:Delete
207:Delete
133:Google
93:delete
46:delete
457:JL 09
419:JL 09
294:could
193:Chris
176:JSTOR
137:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
487:talk
443:Talk
402:talk
387:Note
376:talk
361:Note
351:talk
331:talk
302:talk
268:Talk
241:talk
224:Talk
212:WP:N
197:talk
169:FENS
143:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
396:--
370:--
183:TWL
118:•
114:– (
489:)
404:)
393:.
378:)
367:.
353:)
345:.
333:)
304:)
243:)
214:.
199:)
163:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
485:(
400:(
374:(
349:(
329:(
300:(
239:(
195:(
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.