31:
248:
You warned me already for getting flak, nice that you give it yourself. In my opinion an article must show notability, not external sources. It is up to the original author to give evidence of notability, not for newpage-patrollers to check if an article is maybe notable.
310:
does not show this group at all. One of the references seemed to be for year 1994, which made me think that the page probably is too old. Moreover, this talks of HTTP 1.0 will be worked on, etc (future tense of 1994-1996). I wonder if that task force exists now.
181:
381:
I am not. So even if it is no longer active, I feel it should kept for historical reasons. (?) I mean, it did exist at one point of time and can be referred to by other wikipedia pages.
175:
403:
142:
40:
426:
Notability is not temporary, so if it was notable, then it still is. But in thise case it may not have been active long enough to achieve notability.
115:
110:
289:
how is "not notable" not a policy-based reason for deletion? It does appear that this sub-group does not meet general notability guidelines.
119:
268:, No evidence of significance in the article, some coverage but not anything that could be called significant. Either delete or redirect to
102:
17:
470:
196:
364:
269:
254:
217:
163:
324:
452:
65:
46:
157:
360:
250:
213:
431:
294:
435:
418:
390:
368:
351:
330:
298:
281:
258:
243:
221:
84:
451:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
153:
64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
106:
230:
No reason, based on WP guidelines, was cited for deleting the article. No evidence the nomonatir followed
203:
98:
90:
358:
Now that both HTTP extensions and HTTP/1.1 are stable specifications, W3C has closed the HTTP Activity.
427:
414:
386:
347:
290:
189:
231:
169:
58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
318:
277:
239:
81:
234:
before making the AFD nomination, which is one of many nominations made in apparent haste.
410:
382:
343:
464:
136:
312:
273:
235:
78:
338:. There is evidence of the HTTP Work force existing... Take a look here:
445:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
339:
25:
132:
128:
124:
188:
202:
68:). No further edits should be made to this page.
455:). No further edits should be made to this page.
404:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
8:
402:Note: This debate has been included in the
401:
45:For an explanation of the process, see
356:Are you sure? That page also states:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
29:
308:Active IETF Working Groups link
270:Internet Engineering Task Force
47:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
41:deletion review on 2011 July 13
1:
340:http://www.w3.org/Protocols/
212:Not notable, a subcomittee
487:
85:19:41, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
471:Pages at deletion review
448:Please do not modify it.
436:23:29, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
419:11:37, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
391:20:52, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
369:17:01, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
352:16:38, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
331:08:41, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
299:08:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
282:07:31, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
259:01:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
244:01:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
222:00:52, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
61:Please do not modify it.
361:Night of the Big Wind
251:Night of the Big Wind
214:Night of the Big Wind
99:HTTP Working Group
91:HTTP Working Group
73:The result was
421:
407:
53:
52:
39:was subject to a
478:
450:
408:
327:
321:
315:
207:
206:
192:
140:
122:
63:
33:
32:
26:
486:
485:
481:
480:
479:
477:
476:
475:
461:
460:
459:
453:deletion review
446:
428:HominidMachinae
325:
319:
313:
291:HominidMachinae
228:Procedural keep
149:
113:
97:
94:
66:deletion review
59:
37:This discussion
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
484:
482:
474:
473:
463:
462:
458:
457:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
374:
373:
372:
371:
333:
301:
284:
266:Rediect/Delete
263:
262:
261:
210:
209:
146:
93:
88:
71:
70:
54:
51:
50:
44:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
483:
472:
469:
468:
466:
456:
454:
449:
443:
437:
433:
429:
425:
424:
423:
422:
420:
416:
412:
405:
400:
399:
392:
388:
384:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
370:
366:
362:
359:
355:
354:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
332:
328:
322:
316:
309:
305:
302:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
264:
260:
256:
252:
247:
246:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
226:
225:
224:
223:
219:
215:
205:
201:
198:
195:
191:
187:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
155:
152:
151:Find sources:
147:
144:
138:
134:
130:
126:
121:
117:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
95:
92:
89:
87:
86:
83:
80:
76:
69:
67:
62:
56:
55:
48:
42:
38:
35:
28:
27:
19:
447:
444:
357:
335:
307:
303:
286:
265:
227:
211:
199:
193:
185:
178:
172:
166:
160:
150:
74:
72:
60:
57:
36:
176:free images
411:Tom Morris
232:WP:BEFORE
465:Category
326:contribs
143:View log
77:. v/r -
182:WP refs
170:scholar
116:protect
111:history
383:RahulG
344:RahulG
314:VasuVR
306:. The
304:Delete
287:delete
274:Mtking
236:Edison
154:Google
120:delete
75:delete
197:JSTOR
158:books
137:views
129:watch
125:links
16:<
432:talk
415:talk
387:talk
365:talk
348:talk
336:Keep
320:talk
295:talk
278:talk
255:talk
240:talk
218:talk
190:FENS
164:news
133:logs
107:talk
103:edit
409:— —
204:TWL
141:– (
467::
434:)
417:)
406:.
389:)
367:)
350:)
342:--
329:)
323:,
297:)
280:)
272:.
257:)
242:)
220:)
184:)
135:|
131:|
127:|
123:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
43:.
430:(
413:(
385:(
363:(
346:(
317:(
293:(
276:(
253:(
238:(
216:(
208:)
200:·
194:·
186:·
179:·
173:·
167:·
161:·
156:(
148:(
145:)
139:)
101:(
82:P
79:T
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.