376:
paragraphs, and only mentions the label because they released the song the article is about. The awards are problematic because they're not established music awards - who's "Juno Plus"? Who's "Dummy magazine"? Coming third in a poll isn't winning. Tiny Mix Tapes is a webzine - do we know it's
208:, no assertion of notability. Releases albums linked to a particular London club, gets "top awards" from random websites, and has nothing else significant. The page is currently also being used as a promotional vehicle by listing their entire catalog of releases.
170:
456:; the article exists solely to promote the business. The awards are unconvincing; some are fan based and others are trivial. The subject shows no signs of significance or notability and sources are marginal.
164:
123:
225:
265:
482:
327:
245:
96:
91:
100:
130:
83:
185:
288:. I was initially skeptical, but started checking the sources referenced and was surprised to find that most have Knowledge (XXG) articles (
152:
348:
as having received significant coverage in independent reliable sources. I agree that the 'Discography' section should be deleted per
17:
61:
146:
381:
may be RS, but "Label of the Month" means there were 11 others that year. Music-related items are notable because they win
498:
465:
442:
412:
394:
361:
277:
257:
237:
217:
142:
65:
427:
517:
319:
40:
192:
87:
349:
79:
71:
337:
273:
253:
233:
158:
57:
478:
494:
205:
513:
461:
438:
36:
201:
489:. Add to that the fact that the page is being used for promotion and I will go with a delete here. --
178:
486:
332:
269:
249:
229:
53:
474:
453:
490:
390:
213:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
512:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
457:
314:
290:
400:
345:
403:. I said nothing about awards, only significant coverage in independent reliable sources.
408:
357:
302:
52:. Sources and awards discussed here do not appear to create notability for the topic.
477:. Articles about releases which mention the record label in brief are not useful per
481:. The awards do not have any secondary citations and are not convincing enough. The
386:
209:
117:
323:
312:), so it appears they're something more than 'random websites'. In particular,
404:
353:
385:
awards, not niche things like somebody's Top Ten List or a reader's poll.
341:
377:
notable, or is it notable because it has a
Knowledge (XXG) article?
485:
is essentially an interview with the founder which doesn't satisfy
308:
296:
326:
is certainly significant coverage. A quick google also turned up
506:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
430:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
113:
109:
105:
177:
436:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
191:
372:Recheck your assertions. :) The NPR article is
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
520:). No further edits should be made to this page.
226:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
8:
399:I'm asserting that it's notable if it meets
266:list of England-related deletion discussions
264:Note: This debate has been included in the
244:Note: This debate has been included in the
224:Note: This debate has been included in the
344:. So it seems to me that the subject meets
263:
246:list of Music-related deletion discussions
243:
223:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
466:07:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
443:15:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
413:19:26, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
395:18:41, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
362:13:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
278:11:35, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
258:11:35, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
238:11:35, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
218:17:38, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
1:
324:their feature on Houndstooth
499:10:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
473:The sources do not satisfy
66:15:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
537:
80:Houndstooth (record label)
72:Houndstooth (record label)
509:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
328:a substantial article
338:a 9-nine paragraph
333:Fact (UK magazine)
445:
280:
260:
240:
528:
511:
441:
435:
433:
431:
379:Resident Advisor
318:appears to be a
315:Resident Advisor
291:Resident Advisor
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
536:
535:
531:
530:
529:
527:
526:
525:
524:
518:deletion review
507:
446:
437:
426:
424:
350:WP:NOTCATALOGUE
320:reliable source
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
534:
532:
523:
522:
502:
501:
468:
434:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
365:
364:
303:Tiny Mix Tapes
282:
281:
261:
241:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
533:
521:
519:
515:
510:
504:
503:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
479:WP:INHERITORG
476:
472:
469:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
448:
447:
444:
440:
439:North America
432:
429:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
397:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
375:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
334:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:
311:
310:
305:
304:
299:
298:
293:
292:
287:
284:
283:
279:
275:
271:
270:Coolabahapple
267:
262:
259:
255:
251:
250:Coolabahapple
247:
242:
239:
235:
231:
230:Coolabahapple
227:
222:
221:
220:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
62:contributions
59:
55:
54:Jo-Jo Eumerus
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
508:
505:
491:Lemongirl942
470:
449:
425:
382:
378:
373:
331:
313:
307:
301:
295:
289:
285:
206:WP:CORPDEPTH
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
49:
47:
31:
28:
458:K.e.coffman
352:, however.
202:WP:NOTPROMO
165:free images
514:talk page
487:WP:ORGIND
37:talk page
516:or in a
475:WP:NCORP
454:WP:PROMO
428:Relisted
383:industry
204:, fails
124:View log
39:or in a
483:FactMag
387:MSJapan
342:npr.org
210:MSJapan
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
471:Delete
450:Delete
401:WP:GNG
346:WP:GNG
143:Google
101:delete
50:delete
309:XLR8R
297:Dazed
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
495:talk
462:talk
452:per
409:talk
405:Qwfp
391:talk
374:four
358:talk
354:Qwfp
336:and
322:and
286:Keep
274:talk
254:talk
234:talk
214:talk
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
58:talk
340:on
330:in
193:TWL
122:– (
497:)
464:)
411:)
393:)
360:)
306:,
300:,
294:,
276:)
268:.
256:)
248:.
236:)
228:.
216:)
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
60:,
493:(
460:(
407:(
389:(
356:(
272:(
252:(
232:(
212:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.