404:
No, I don't think your pointing to policies, or the use of the letter Q in your user name, or the fact that it's
Saturday today, are personal attacks. However, I do in fact think that your snide remarks are a personal attack. I hope I have clarified this for you. If you have any more queries about
180:
174:
135:
211:
The article appears to have been added as promotional material for a low-budget, non-notable film. A request for citations to prove notability has gone unanswered since 2008.
251:
273:
140:
108:
103:
112:
95:
195:
17:
162:
434:
Can it be further improved? Sure. Does it require deletion because of addressable issues with style, format, or sourcing? Nope.
57:
316:
sources toward the topic are available... and more, sources need NOT have been in the article for topic notability to exist
156:
489:
40:
152:
443:
396:
345:
470:
446:
414:
399:
366:
348:
287:
265:
242:
220:
77:
202:
99:
327:
467:
485:
410:
362:
216:
68:
36:
299:
436:
389:
338:
168:
188:
380:
319:
311:
91:
83:
283:
261:
238:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
484:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
428:
315:
303:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
406:
358:
331:
212:
61:
56:, and as several ediors noted, such sources were in the article at the time of nomination. (
384:
376:
323:
307:
72:
53:
424:
354:
405:
what I might or might not think are personal attacks, then please feel free to ask.
229:
No seems to have RS and GNG with coverage in Asia
Pacific Arts and the Japan Times.
279:
257:
231:
129:
462:. After a quick search, I was able to find several reviews, especially
463:
423:
issues that have proven easily addressable through regular editing.
478:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
306:, the nominator's complaint that the article sat unsourced is a
326:, he might even have improved it himself. Of course, now that
431:
even before being brought to AFD and article is now improved.
432:
420:
335:
125:
121:
117:
187:
383:
is a personal attack, then by all means take this to
201:
334:for showing the spirit that builds an encyclopdia.
419:My point was that what was first nominated "had"
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
492:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
272:Note: This debate has been included in the
250:Note: This debate has been included in the
271:
252:list of Japan-related deletion discussions
249:
330:we can close this and move on. Kudos to
274:list of Film-related deletion discussions
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
52:. Reviews of the subject fulfill
308:pretty weak deletion rationale
1:
429:met through available sources
276:. 19:17, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
254:. 19:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
471:02:16, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
447:05:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
415:00:00, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
400:23:20, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
375:If you feel my pointing to
367:06:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
349:05:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
328:this AFD has forced cleanup
288:19:17, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
266:19:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
243:06:42, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
221:23:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
78:20:45, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
509:
481:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
466:. Clearly notable.
310:when even a little
92:Hazard (2005 film)
84:Hazard (2005 film)
48:The result was
468:Narutolovehinata5
290:
277:
268:
255:
76:
58:non-admin closure
500:
483:
439:
425:Topic notability
392:
341:
332:User:Tokyogirl79
296:Definite Keep...
278:
256:
234:
206:
205:
191:
143:
133:
115:
70:
66:
34:
508:
507:
503:
502:
501:
499:
498:
497:
496:
490:deletion review
479:
437:
390:
355:personal attack
353:The above is a
339:
298:In considering
232:
148:
139:
106:
90:
87:
62:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
506:
504:
495:
494:
474:
473:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
370:
369:
318:. Heck... per
292:
291:
269:
246:
245:
209:
208:
145:
86:
81:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
505:
493:
491:
487:
482:
476:
475:
472:
469:
465:
461:
458:
448:
445:
444:
441:
440:
433:
430:
426:
422:
418:
417:
416:
412:
408:
403:
402:
401:
398:
397:
394:
393:
386:
382:
378:
374:
373:
372:
371:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
351:
350:
347:
346:
343:
342:
336:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
294:
293:
289:
285:
281:
275:
270:
267:
263:
259:
253:
248:
247:
244:
240:
236:
235:
228:
225:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
204:
200:
197:
194:
190:
186:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
154:
151:
150:Find sources:
146:
142:
137:
131:
127:
123:
119:
114:
110:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
88:
85:
82:
80:
79:
74:
71:(note: not a
69:
67:
65:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
480:
477:
459:
442:
435:
395:
388:
379:or relevant
344:
337:
295:
230:
226:
210:
198:
192:
184:
177:
171:
165:
159:
149:
64:I, Jethrobot
63:
49:
47:
31:
28:
407:JoshuSasori
359:JoshuSasori
300:WP:NOEFFORT
213:JoshuSasori
175:free images
387:. Cheers.
486:talk page
320:WP:HANDLE
312:WP:BEFORE
280:• Gene93k
258:• Gene93k
37:talk page
488:or in a
464:this one
438:Schmidt,
391:Schmidt,
340:Schmidt,
136:View log
39:or in a
304:WP:UGLY
233:Lugnuts
181:WP refs
169:scholar
109:protect
104:history
385:WP:ANI
381:policy
377:WP:ATA
324:WP:ATD
314:shows
153:Google
113:delete
54:WP:GNG
421:minor
196:JSTOR
157:books
141:Stats
130:views
122:watch
118:links
16:<
460:Keep
427:was
411:talk
363:talk
322:and
302:and
284:talk
262:talk
239:talk
227:Keep
217:talk
189:FENS
163:news
126:logs
100:talk
96:edit
50:keep
203:TWL
138:•
134:– (
73:bot
413:)
365:)
357:.
286:)
264:)
241:)
219:)
183:)
128:|
124:|
120:|
116:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
75:!)
60:)
409:(
361:(
282:(
260:(
237:(
215:(
207:)
199:·
193:·
185:·
178:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
155:(
147:(
144:)
132:)
94:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.