458:, suggesting that the entire "Investigation" section is tainted with unproven accusations against various people suspected of having a role in Hailey Dunn's disappearance and presumed murder, and proposing that this entire section should be thoroughly removed. The fact that these claims may have been made in newspapers does not (per my understanding of
282:
281:, so much that they've absorbed a ton of information from other news sources not found on Knowledge (XXG). It' like saying if I did nothing but edit baseball articles, I'd be a single purpose account as well. I have no vote since I don't know the guidelines that decides what makes a missing girl notable, but here's the
435:- That 'single-purpose' editor, Allycat1208, referenced by nom above, creates and edits articles on murdered and missing children. I'll take that bit of argument for deletion by assuming good faith and say that I don't think there is anything wrong with being a single-purpose editor on Knowledge (XXG).
396:
If it were up to me, I would say 1000+ articles. However, I have seen cases pass their aFD with less than 1000 articles, but much more than 54. This case has not received massive media coverage, it did not inspire any new laws, there have been no TV specials/documentaries or movies made it, no books
462:) make it OK to repeat the allegations. Note that even though Hailey Dunn may be dead (and thus the article itself is not a BLP), the BLP policy still applies to statements made in the article regarding living people. As for whether the article itself belongs, I am inclined to !vote to
550:
policy before writing any more articles on similar topics - this type of article (even if meeting
Knowledge (XXG) notability guidelines) needs a great deal of care to avoid implications that are unjustified, and negative portrayal of individuals that have had no part in the case itself.
207:
Why would anything claimed in this article be considered potentially libelous if what is written is just paraphrased from what one read in news articles? I thought the whole idea of citing references protects such statements that may appear libelous? Am I wrong?
545:
per nom etc. Sadly, cases like this are rarely of great long-term significance, except to those involved. And yes, there were serious issues with the 'investigation' section too. I think the article creator should familiarise him/herself with core
189:
article listed below) Standard missing person case, one of tens of thousands worldwide. No individual notability about this case. Article added by the same single purpose user. Some potentially libelous statements. NPOV.
154:
576:. These are tragic events, but such tragic events happen every day and are reported every day in reliable news sources. This does not usually render the victims notable. In the case of
115:
418:- Plenty of Google hits, this is notable. The other problems with the article may be solved by being bold and editing it, but they are not valid criteria for deletion.
231:
322:
148:
299:
348:- per the reason events of an arrest and developments overall. Hailey Dunn gets 3 830 000 hits on google too.. so coverage has been made to a good extent.--
277:
I don't think an account should be labelled as a Single
Purpose Account when they edit many different missing persons articles. Some seem enthralled with
522:. Per editor just above me. This kind of event is always going to receive significant coverage for a time. We can't have articles about all of them. See
509:
17:
490:
88:
83:
92:
169:
278:
136:
75:
604:
36:
603:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
580:, I think persistence in sources is key. For the sake of the subject, let's hope we're dealing with BLP here.
130:
556:
402:
370:
475:
387:
261:
213:
126:
589:
560:
535:
494:
444:
427:
406:
398:
391:
374:
366:
357:
337:
314:
292:
265:
246:
217:
57:
186:
79:
242:
573:
523:
486:
176:
162:
53:
577:
569:
505:
471:
467:
440:
423:
71:
63:
585:
552:
333:
310:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
455:
383:
353:
257:
209:
547:
513:
459:
531:
512:
has very few hits - I count 13, though YMMV. I see no points of notability and very great
238:
142:
479:
195:
49:
256:
This case is a Texas case, not
Florida. The Hailegh Cummings case is a Florida case.
436:
419:
382:
How many hits for a topic from google news archive is enough to be deemed important?
581:
329:
306:
286:
109:
349:
527:
191:
478:
out of concern for the material in the "Investigation" section.
597:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
365:- Google News Archive brings up 54 articles, a very low amount.
105:
101:
97:
161:
175:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
607:). No further edits should be made to this page.
454:. I've put a notice about this article on the
470:— and if the article is deleted, it should be
8:
321:Note: This debate has been included in the
298:Note: This debate has been included in the
232:list of Florida-related deletion discussions
230:Note: This debate has been included in the
323:list of People-related deletion discussions
320:
300:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
297:
229:
516:risk for others named in the article.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
279:Missing white woman syndrome
225:09:39, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
590:03:09, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
561:02:11, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
536:01:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
495:01:01, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
445:20:52, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
428:20:51, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
407:23:40, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
392:19:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
375:18:31, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
358:14:41, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
338:00:52, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
315:00:52, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
293:11:32, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
266:05:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
247:11:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
218:21:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
58:05:50, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
624:
600:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
283:Google News results
44:The result was
340:
326:
317:
303:
249:
235:
187:Haleigh Cummings
615:
602:
327:
304:
289:
236:
180:
179:
165:
113:
95:
34:
623:
622:
618:
617:
616:
614:
613:
612:
611:
605:deletion review
598:
456:BLP noticeboard
287:
122:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
621:
619:
610:
609:
593:
592:
563:
539:
538:
517:
498:
497:
448:
447:
430:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
397:written, etc.
360:
342:
341:
318:
295:
271:
270:
269:
268:
251:
250:
223:
222:
221:
220:
183:
182:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
620:
608:
606:
601:
595:
594:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
564:
562:
558:
554:
549:
544:
541:
540:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
518:
515:
511:
508:and per nom.
507:
503:
500:
499:
496:
492:
488:
484:
482:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
450:
449:
446:
442:
438:
434:
431:
429:
425:
421:
417:
414:
408:
404:
400:
395:
394:
393:
389:
385:
381:
378:
377:
376:
372:
368:
364:
361:
359:
355:
351:
347:
344:
343:
339:
335:
331:
324:
319:
316:
312:
308:
301:
296:
294:
291:
290:
288:Agent Vodello
284:
280:
276:
273:
272:
267:
263:
259:
255:
254:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
233:
228:
227:
226:
219:
215:
211:
206:
203:
202:
201:
200:
199:
197:
193:
188:
178:
174:
171:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
128:
125:
124:Find sources:
120:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
599:
596:
565:
553:AndyTheGrump
542:
519:
501:
480:
463:
451:
432:
415:
399:Laladoodle92
379:
367:Laladoodle92
362:
345:
285:
274:
224:
204:
184:
172:
166:
158:
151:
145:
139:
133:
123:
45:
43:
31:
28:
510:Google News
476:oversighted
384:Allycat1208
258:Allycat1208
210:Allycat1208
149:free images
72:Hailey Dunn
64:Hailey Dunn
574:WP:NOTNEWS
524:WP:NOTNEWS
239:Tom Morris
578:WP:EVENTS
570:WP:VICTIM
506:WP:VICTIM
468:WP:VICTIM
330:• Gene93k
307:• Gene93k
185:(Same as
50:Ironholds
491:contribs
437:Roodog2k
420:Roodog2k
380:Question
205:Question
116:View log
582:BusterD
474:'ed or
452:Comment
433:Comment
275:Neutral
155:WP refs
143:scholar
89:protect
84:history
566:Delete
548:WP:BLP
543:Delete
520:Delete
514:WP:BLP
502:Delete
472:revdel
464:delete
460:WP:BLP
363:Delete
350:BabbaQ
127:Google
93:delete
46:delete
528:Bbb23
483:wales
170:JSTOR
131:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
586:talk
572:and
568:per
557:talk
532:talk
504:per
487:talk
481:Rich
466:per
441:talk
424:talk
416:Keep
403:talk
388:talk
371:talk
354:talk
346:Keep
334:talk
311:talk
262:talk
243:talk
214:talk
196:talk
192:Dmol
163:FENS
137:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
526:.--
198:)
177:TWL
114:– (
588:)
559:)
534:)
493:)
489:·
443:)
426:)
405:)
390:)
373:)
356:)
336:)
328:—
325:.
313:)
305:—
302:.
264:)
245:)
234:.
216:)
157:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
584:(
555:(
530:(
485:(
439:(
422:(
401:(
386:(
369:(
352:(
332:(
309:(
260:(
241:(
237:—
212:(
194:(
181:)
173:·
167:·
159:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
134:·
129:(
121:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.