259:, that's just pouring salt in the wound to permaban an article because someone likes to vandalize it. Awful lot of power to the vandal, isn't it? So come on, that's pretty dadgum notable. Hamumu Software articles have existed here before, and probably will again (well, in the absence of a salting of the earth) - the fans keep making them when they get deleted, and believe me, I have NO connection to that. They just want to talk about it. That sounds like notable to me. Why leave up a page about a JOKE I did while deleting the reference to the company that did it?
31:
222:
I'm the Mike Hommel in question on the page. With the exception of the existence of a "Dark Lord Farley Amulet" in LL2, the article is factual (if pretty silly and unprofessional). I confess to a bit of bias in this matter, but here is why Hamumu is notable: "Microsoft Word satisfies this criterion
194:
I'm not saying it's notable, I just think the vandalism needs to be sorted through first. I don't know how much of this article is true. But I'm changing my vote to "Weak Keep" since even now I'm unsure of its notability.
318:. If it needs cleanup, clean it. Don't delete it, that's not helping. And what the heck does it being attacked by vandals or not being as famous as Dramatica have to do with anything?! PK 03:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
223:
because people who are wholly independent of
Microsoft have written books about it." (from the guide to deletion) - okay, here are where independent people have written about me (no books, sadly, but come on!):
255:- both written by people wholly unaffiliated with me (furthermore, the SpisFAQ referenced on the SPISPOPD page is another example of this). Google Hamumu Software for dozens more such references. As for
247:
interviewed here, and of course my games have been reviewed all over the place for a decade. Lastly, I have two more references, that aren't quite so external, but do fit the definition:
146:
182:
I'm not sure why its frequent vandalism is a reason not to delete it? I don't know whether it should or not, but I'm not sure why vandalism would show notability. ---
40:
290:
as not notable and unsourced. Links and references are not reliable sources as they come from the company's own site. Being a vandal target is criteria for
262:
167:
324:
The content is frequently altered to include stupid shit that vandals like to add, and nobody reverts it. I only caught one once, a long time ago.
266:
342:. The article does not have independent, reliable, non-trivial and non-autobiography secondary sources to pass the notability criteria. —
119:
114:
123:
17:
398:
106:
211:
380:
65:
46:
240:
379:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
270:
365:
353:
328:
310:
298:
274:
186:
174:
157:
88:
199:
110:
361:, just salt it, it has been up for deletion over a week now and consensus seems to lean toward delete.
252:
102:
94:
362:
307:
183:
154:
248:
86:
58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
339:
291:
256:
207:
347:
228:
295:
244:
224:
392:
306:, simply because I don't see any real indication or evidence that this is notable --
78:
140:
325:
203:
171:
343:
153:
Non notable company, doesn't cite its sources. Not as famous as
Dramatica. --
232:
373:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
236:
25:
170:
who is still vandalizing this article via sockpuppets.
136:
132:
128:
166:
for now. This article is a favorite target of vandal
68:). No further edits should be made to this page.
383:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
45:For an explanation of the process, see
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
41:deletion review on 2011 February 9
24:
338:. Fails the Primary Criterion of
29:
47:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
1:
225:Dr. Lunatic Supreme With Wiki
164:Weak Keep (changed from Keep)
239:(now defunct) another fan,
415:
229:Player's Guide To Supreme
399:Pages at deletion review
376:Please do not modify it.
366:16:23, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
89:23:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
61:Please do not modify it.
354:07:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
329:15:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
311:23:46, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
299:14:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
275:19:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
187:13:08, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
175:07:07, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
158:01:50, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
265:comment was added by
294:, but not keeping.
227:- a site by a fan,
243:interviewed here,
235:- some more fans,
278:
216:
202:comment added by
53:
52:
39:was subject to a
406:
378:
350:
260:
233:The Loonyversity
215:
196:
144:
126:
63:
33:
32:
26:
414:
413:
409:
408:
407:
405:
404:
403:
389:
388:
387:
381:deletion review
374:
348:
261:—The preceding
253:Hamumu Software
231:- another fan,
197:
117:
103:Hamumu Software
101:
98:
95:Hamumu Software
84:
73:The result was
66:deletion review
59:
37:This discussion
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
412:
410:
402:
401:
391:
390:
386:
385:
369:
368:
356:
333:
332:
331:
313:
301:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
267:72.173.102.172
245:GameTunnel.com
237:Pants Of Power
151:
150:
97:
92:
82:
71:
70:
54:
51:
50:
44:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
411:
400:
397:
396:
394:
384:
382:
377:
371:
370:
367:
364:
360:
359:Speedy delete
357:
355:
351:
345:
341:
337:
334:
330:
327:
323:
320:
319:
317:
314:
312:
309:
305:
302:
300:
297:
293:
289:
286:
276:
272:
268:
264:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
221:
218:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
193:
190:
189:
188:
185:
181:
178:
177:
176:
173:
169:
165:
162:
161:
160:
159:
156:
148:
142:
138:
134:
130:
125:
121:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:
96:
93:
91:
90:
87:
85:
81:
76:
69:
67:
62:
56:
55:
48:
42:
38:
35:
28:
27:
19:
375:
372:
358:
335:
321:
315:
303:
287:
219:
198:— Preceding
191:
179:
163:
152:
79:
74:
72:
60:
57:
36:
304:Weak delete
241:Joystiq.com
83:(Stephen)
363:Lulzdrama
296:DarkAudit
393:Category
308:Miskwito
263:unsigned
249:SPISPOPD
212:contribs
200:unsigned
147:View log
340:WP:CORP
322:Comment
292:WP:SALT
257:WP:SALT
220:Comment
192:Comment
184:Mithent
180:Comment
155:Clavern
120:protect
115:history
336:Delete
326:JuJube
288:Delete
204:JuJube
172:JuJube
124:delete
75:Delete
349:reply
344:Indon
168:Heekz
141:views
133:watch
129:links
80:Steve
16:<
352:) —
316:Keep
271:talk
251:and
208:talk
137:logs
111:talk
107:edit
145:– (
395::
273:)
214:)
210:•
139:|
135:|
131:|
127:|
122:|
118:|
113:|
109:|
77:--
43:.
346:(
277:.
269:(
206:(
149:)
143:)
105:(
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.