190:
I'm the one who originally flagged it for spam. I removed my tag because of the clean-up that was immediately done. Possibly too much of a clean-up, as some info has gone that might be of use. One editor? As the creator says, it's a brand-new article. Notability? Maybe. It might be an idea to merge
143:
Comment - I am the only editor because it was only posted today. Also, I'm not sure what exactly would be needed to differentiate it from an advertising post? I would have to argue that any company entry could subjectively be viewed as both informational and advertising...
191:
it with its parent United Bank Card until it's established more of a name for itself. The creator seems to me to have edited in good faith and tried to fit the guidelines. (No, I don't have any connection with the company. Yes, I do hit hard at the spammers.)
127:
I do not see a good indication of notability for this one-year-old company. Further, this article is an orphan and has just one primary editor — I believe this page is being used purely for advertisement purposes.
120:
210:
87:
82:
17:
91:
74:
160:
266:
36:
265:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
133:
251:
225:
200:
180:
164:
137:
56:
148:
129:
152:
221:
196:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
78:
156:
237:
244:
217:
192:
50:
108:
70:
62:
176:
241:
259:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
115:
104:
100:
96:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
269:). No further edits should be made to this page.
211:list of Business-related deletion discussions
8:
209:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
252:02:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
226:10:45, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
201:00:08, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
181:22:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
174:as non-notable and as spam.
165:22:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
138:21:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
57:01:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
286:
262:Please do not modify it.
236:, no evidence it passes
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
249:
228:
214:
168:
151:comment added by
277:
264:
248:
245:
215:
205:
167:
145:
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
285:
284:
280:
279:
278:
276:
275:
274:
273:
267:deletion review
260:
246:
146:
114:
85:
69:
66:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
283:
281:
272:
271:
255:
254:
230:
229:
203:
184:
183:
169:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
282:
270:
268:
263:
257:
256:
253:
250:
243:
239:
235:
232:
231:
227:
223:
219:
212:
208:
204:
202:
198:
194:
189:
186:
185:
182:
179:
178:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
142:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
261:
258:
233:
206:
187:
175:
171:
126:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
147:—Preceding
71:Harbortouch
63:Harbortouch
218:• Gene93k
161:contribs
149:unsigned
130:Timneu22
121:View log
238:WP:CORP
193:Peridon
188:Comment
88:protect
83:history
52:MBisanz
234:Delete
172:Delete
116:delete
92:delete
46:delete
177:Cquan
153:N7912
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
240:. --
222:talk
207:Note
197:talk
157:talk
134:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
242:fvw
216:--
213:.
224:)
199:)
163:)
159:•
136:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
247:*
220:(
195:(
155:(
132:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.