227:
Notable in the sense of being "famous", or "popular" - although not irrelevant - is secondary." In the
English-language Western speaking world, great wealth is considered so notable, both in our times, and in Harriet Sylvia Ann Howland Green Wilks' time, that there well known lists issued year after year of the wealthiest men and women, businessmen, Asian businessmen, actors and actresses, models, race car drivers. You cannot walk into a newstand or into a well-developed on-line news site without finding some list or article about wealth. "Wealth" is "worthy of notice," and Green Wilks' wealth in her time, and her means of managing it, was "unusual enough to deserve attention and to be recorded" in the archives of newspapers all over the United States. Great wealth meets the notability requirements of Knowledge for biography. --
366:
as creator, meets the standard of
Knowledge notability since the "topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be notable." An interesting part of Americana, that was sent down the memory hole, and now back. It was speedy deleted
328:
The combination of the $ 95 million in 1951 & the lawsuit, with the article in Time (which refers to an earlier article as well) , is sufficient. There is undoubtedly more documentation on the lawsuit to be found. Two feature articles in that magazine is sufficient, even without the LATimes
226:
I'll provide one: "Within
Knowledge, notability is an inclusion criterion based on the encyclopedic suitability of an article topic. The topic of an article should be notable, or "worthy of notice"; that is "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded.".
348:
The woman is every bit as notorious in her own right as mommy dearest, well, almost. Sad little article (in length only, content's fine), needs some work, but there's no reason to delete this just because everyone on the web hasn't heard of her yet.
311:(her mother) who was certainly notable. The coverage of the daughter is an insignificant amount that does not meet the general notability guideline. The references about the daughter can be moved to the mother's article.
92:
87:
46:
withdrawn by nom, early consensus that a statement of great inherited wealth alone is both an assertion of importance under CSD and if this has been reported in reliable sources, is notable
96:
252:, as the references provided in the article indicate sufficient coverage of this person in third-party reliable sources as to establish a presumption of her notability pursuant to our
79:
125:
83:
376:
217:
167:
75:
67:
380:
358:
340:
320:
297:
277:
260:
236:
221:
195:
171:
145:
61:
372:
213:
163:
132:
Deleted as CSD A7, in DRV some editors may have felt the text's mention of wealth was an assertion of significance or importance. Fails
17:
371:
stated "wealth an assertion of significance", despite the obituaries in the LA Times and multiple Time magazine articles. --
162:, so we all can know what your thinking. You can't tell someone its in the Bible without citing a chapter and verse. --
395:
204:
parameter you are citing to use as a reason for either the previous speedy deletion or this deletion. I can read
36:
394:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
316:
253:
350:
273:
228:
191:
141:
57:
354:
293:
232:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
312:
368:
269:
187:
137:
53:
336:
289:
205:
201:
183:
159:
155:
133:
257:
113:
308:
49:
331:
212:
think it fails. I can't fix, unless you tell me what is broken. --
388:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
288:
This isn't a vote... or at least it isn't supposed to be. --
120:
109:
105:
101:
48:. I suggest the content could be helpfully merged into
208:
over and over and it still will not tell me which one
52:but this should be dependent on editor consensus.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
398:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
186:was a much quicker read than the Bible :)
158:, please make an effort to cite a line of
154:If your going to say an article fails
76:Harriet Sylvia Ann Howland Green Wilks
68:Harriet Sylvia Ann Howland Green Wilks
7:
200:Yet, I still haven't a clue which
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
373:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
214:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
164:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
1:
254:general notability guideline
415:
391:Please do not modify it.
381:05:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
359:05:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
341:05:05, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
321:04:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
298:04:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
278:04:02, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
261:03:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
237:07:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
222:13:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
196:06:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
172:06:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
146:03:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
62:14:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
182:Last time I looked,
44:The result was
268:: non-notable. --
406:
393:
123:
117:
99:
34:
414:
413:
409:
408:
407:
405:
404:
403:
402:
396:deletion review
389:
119:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
412:
410:
401:
400:
384:
383:
361:
343:
323:
302:
301:
300:
263:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
224:
175:
174:
130:
129:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
411:
399:
397:
392:
386:
385:
382:
378:
374:
370:
365:
362:
360:
356:
352:
347:
344:
342:
338:
334:
333:
327:
324:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
285:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
264:
262:
259:
255:
251:
248:
247:
238:
234:
230:
225:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
198:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
180:
179:
178:
177:
176:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
150:
149:
148:
147:
143:
139:
135:
127:
122:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
390:
387:
363:
345:
330:
325:
304:
283:
282:
265:
249:
209:
151:
131:
45:
43:
31:
28:
309:Hetty Green
50:Hetty Green
313:Ryan Paddy
286:: notable.
369:Gwen Gale
270:MZMcBride
188:Gwen Gale
138:Gwen Gale
54:Gwen Gale
367:because
351:Blechnic
290:Rividian
229:Blechnic
126:View log
258:John254
152:Comment
93:protect
88:history
266:Delete
206:WP:BIO
202:WP:BIO
184:WP:BIO
160:WP:BIO
156:WP:BIO
134:WP:BIO
121:delete
97:delete
305:Merge
124:) – (
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
377:talk
364:Keep
355:talk
346:Keep
337:talk
326:Keep
317:talk
294:talk
284:Keep
274:talk
250:Keep
233:talk
218:talk
192:talk
168:talk
142:talk
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
332:DGG
307:to
210:you
379:)
357:)
349:--
339:)
319:)
296:)
276:)
256:.
235:)
220:)
194:)
170:)
144:)
136:.
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
375:(
353:(
335:(
315:(
292:(
272:(
231:(
216:(
190:(
166:(
140:(
128:)
118:(
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.