240:(XXG). It turns the encyclopedia into a popularity contest. I disagree with this on principle. And as a lifelong supporter of regionalism, I do not think that artists should have to flock to the major cities of the world to have their contributions validated. If Moore's visual art was not worthwhile it would not be in private and public collections. If his sonic art was not valid then he would not be sought after as a collaboration partner. But I agree the entry needs to be tied to other artists. That's easy to do... except that all those other artists could have the same objections levelled at their entries! Where is the incentive to write half a dozen other entries knowing they all could be deleted?
259:
many fields. If we started allowing entries for everyone with some potential in some area, Knowledge (XXG) would no longer be an encyclopedia. Keep in mind that it might not be the right time for an article on Harry Moore. Maybe in a year or more there will be an objective basis for notability. Again, none of this has anything to do with the quality of his work. I really want you to continue writing articles. One idea is to write articles on the artistic movements themselves. There is likely to be much more source material and you can point to many artists. In time, individual artists within a movement may gain sufficient notability to justify their own articles.--
214:- I sympathise with the author who points out visual artists are under-represented on Knowledge (XXG). However, this article currently stands as more of a CV for Moore, cited to primary sources with a clear vested interest in promoting him on their websites. There is what appears to be a magazine review of Moore's joint exhibition in Cobh (where he is also gallery director) but no indication of the source. We need proof Moore and/or his work are
239:
artist working in an experimental or fringe field to have acknowledged third-party articles extant. It is quite simply the fact that no press exists that covers these activities. So this policy in essence says that only artists working in populist forms and genres should be represented in
Knowledge
258:
I very much sympathize with the points you make, but objectively, how are editors to judge when a relatively unrecognized artist is doing profound work without secondary sources? Notability forces us to leave out, for now, people who will one day become recognized as innovators. This is true for
386:, but unfortunately it's only an exhibit announcement, not a review. It is not true that sources on contemporary artists don't exist (newspaper reviews of art exhibits are common enough, and there are any number of more specialized magazines that can be used as sources) and it is
161:
337:
235:- Disclosure: I am the primary author of the article and have met and worked with Moore, since we are fellow sound artists. I understand the objections to this entry. However, it is unrealistic to expect
114:
155:
317:
297:
277:
121:
87:
82:
91:
360:. I am One hits the nail on the head. The chief requirement of Knowledge (XXG) is that there should be sufficient independent reliable sources.
74:
176:
143:
17:
408:
137:
465:
40:
133:
446:
428:
399:
369:
349:
329:
309:
289:
268:
264:
249:
227:
205:
201:
56:
183:
395:
78:
70:
62:
461:
260:
197:
36:
149:
442:
424:
365:
416:
391:
169:
215:
193:
245:
345:
325:
305:
285:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
460:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
437:
per Sionk, unfortunately this artist does not meet the notability guidelines at this time. --
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
387:
438:
420:
361:
223:
415:
web-pages and it appears there's not much more out there. There are similar concerns for
412:
241:
341:
321:
301:
281:
108:
379:
53:
219:
196:
and sources in the article support notability only in Cork, Ireland.
454:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
338:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
104:
100:
96:
168:
182:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
468:). No further edits should be made to this page.
318:list of Photography-related deletion discussions
298:list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions
192:Lacks reliable, independent, secondary sources
411:. The citation list consists entirely of non-
218:and I can't find anything convincing online.
8:
336:Note: This debate has been included in the
316:Note: This debate has been included in the
296:Note: This debate has been included in the
278:list of Ireland-related deletion discussions
276:Note: This debate has been included in the
335:
315:
295:
275:
390:to make up for gaps in their coverage. —
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
388:not Knowledge (XXG)'s responsibility
24:
419:, to which this article links.
1:
429:15:45, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
400:23:04, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
370:01:36, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
350:00:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
330:00:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
310:00:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
290:00:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
269:00:12, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
250:21:54, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
228:18:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
206:17:39, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
485:
447:15:09, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
57:22:22, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
457:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
409:directory information
407:. I could only find
71:Harry Moore (artist)
63:Harry Moore (artist)
358:Provisional delete
48:The result was
352:
332:
312:
292:
476:
459:
380:this brief story
261:I am One of Many
198:I am One of Many
187:
186:
172:
124:
112:
94:
34:
484:
483:
479:
478:
477:
475:
474:
473:
472:
466:deletion review
455:
129:
120:
85:
69:
66:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
482:
480:
471:
470:
450:
449:
432:
417:The Quiet Club
402:
392:David Eppstein
373:
354:
353:
333:
313:
293:
273:
272:
271:
253:
252:
230:
190:
189:
126:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
481:
469:
467:
463:
458:
452:
451:
448:
444:
440:
436:
433:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
403:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
378:. I did find
377:
374:
371:
367:
363:
359:
356:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
334:
331:
327:
323:
319:
314:
311:
307:
303:
299:
294:
291:
287:
283:
279:
274:
270:
266:
262:
257:
256:
255:
254:
251:
247:
243:
238:
234:
231:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
195:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
123:
119:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
456:
453:
434:
404:
383:
375:
357:
236:
232:
216:widely known
211:
191:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
117:
49:
47:
31:
28:
384:Irish Times
156:free images
439:Cerebellum
421:Agricola44
362:Xxanthippe
462:talk page
342:• Gene93k
322:• Gene93k
302:• Gene93k
282:• Gene93k
194:WP:PEOPLE
37:talk page
464:or in a
242:Robin726
115:View log
39:or in a
382:in the
162:WP refs
150:scholar
88:protect
83:history
435:Delete
405:Delete
376:Delete
212:Delete
134:Google
92:delete
54:Secret
50:delete
413:WP:RS
220:Sionk
177:JSTOR
138:books
122:Stats
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
443:talk
425:talk
396:talk
366:talk
346:talk
326:talk
306:talk
286:talk
265:talk
246:talk
233:Keep
224:talk
202:talk
170:FENS
144:news
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
237:any
184:TWL
113:– (
445:)
427:)
398:)
368:)
348:)
340:.
328:)
320:.
308:)
300:.
288:)
280:.
267:)
248:)
226:)
204:)
164:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
52:.
441:(
431:.
423:(
394:(
372:.
364:(
344:(
324:(
304:(
284:(
263:(
244:(
222:(
200:(
188:)
180:·
174:·
166:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
136:(
128:(
125:)
118:·
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.