486:
fire for his under-age partying; media attention no other competitor from the junior counterpart has received. However, since leaving the show, Maxwell has kept up a profile which none of the other candidates have and for this reason I think it's noteworthy. His business ventures and partnerships with LinkedIn and a Made in
Chelsea star were reported on Mail Online six months ago, he has appeared as a recurring celebrity feature in an ITV2 series following his appearance, has been caught up in documented romances with two other reality stars and has come under fire for his partying at prestigious events like the BRITs. Furthermore, he has signed an exclusivity deal with Yahoo! and writes a weekly column giving his viewpoints. I think in terms of the show itself, I could understand why you may want to delete it, although he is definitely the stand-out in the bunch. However his activities post show and the interest shown by the British press and online outlets justifies the articles existence.
352:, this one is a bit tricky in that his star is definitely on the rise and in a year from now I'll have no doubt that he's much more notable that what he is now. But if we're just looking at the here and now I'd say that the article should stay. There certainly seems to be a bit about him on a multitude of sites. (
527:
Meets notability criteria, hence last page deletion request was disapproved. It's not a case of "No other Junior
Apprentice candidates have a seperate page" - work as a presenter for Yahoo!, relationships with reality TV stars, business venture coverage from outlets like Mail Online (all in the last
485:
If we were to solely consider the Junior
Apprentice process that Maxwell competed in 18 months ago, I could see your reasoning for deletion more. Although Maxwell did a global record for survival from any incarnation of The Apprentice, was caught-up in a well documented love-triangle and came under
404:
Don't you think we should have a look at his current activities and see then in say 6 months time what's happening. I thik we should hold off on any merge or deletion etc. I have a very strong feeling that if this article is deleted now it will be up and running in less than a year. By that time he
500:
Unless we are considering some great purge of any of the big names from The
Apprentice having their own Knowledge page? Whilst no other Junior Apprentice has their own page, Maxwell has greater references and a higher profile than some of the winners from the main series accolading an individual
206:. For Junior Apprentice specifically, not a single other contestant has had a descriptive biographical article yet created and there similarly appears to be a deal of self- and brand promotion which may flirt with the
201:
I have no doubt that the programme that this individual appeared on, in and of itself, had/has a particular notability but I cannot see any compliance herein contained in this article with the requirements set out on
170:
256:
318:
287:
53:
164:
528:
six months) meets the guidelines of "significant coverage" with "reliable" "sources" and when combined with the apprentice background means the page should stay
123:
444:
Tiller54 have you actually looked at the other Young
Apprentice candidates at all/ even read Maxwell's page? I think you will see he is much more notable
130:
228:. Unneccessary article waste of space and not a notable person. Also as said no other young person on the young apprentice has a page.
96:
91:
100:
17:
83:
185:
152:
552:
335:
304:
273:
607:
518:
449:
40:
146:
491:
586:
477:
436:
427:
He was on The
Apprentice two years ago, why would he suddenly become more notable in the next six months?
414:
396:
379:
361:
341:
310:
279:
247:
219:
142:
65:
603:
87:
36:
215:
387:
No more notable than any of the other Young
Apprentice candidates who do not have their own articles.
540:
514:
445:
410:
357:
203:
192:
487:
375:
178:
79:
71:
580:
533:
432:
392:
56:
has established that socking adversely affected the result. Deletion is the appropriate option
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
602:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
565:
548:
529:
510:
463:
235:
61:
158:
406:
353:
207:
405:
would have had more appearances under his belt and no doubt his star would have risen. (
472:
371:
330:
299:
268:
577:
502:
428:
388:
211:
117:
544:
506:
57:
568:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
468:
323:
292:
261:
596:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
234:. I agree, Maxwell doesn't meet the notability guidelines.
257:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
113:
109:
105:
177:
575:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
319:
list of United
Kingdom-related deletion discussions
288:
54:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Maxwhr/Archive
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
610:). No further edits should be made to this page.
52:. I previously closed this as no-consensus, but
513:. Maxwell is also a much more recent feature.
191:
8:
317:Note: This debate has been included in the
286:Note: This debate has been included in the
255:Note: This debate has been included in the
316:
285:
254:
370:Not a notable subject at the moment.
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
536:) 18:49, 11 May 2013 (GMT)
627:
521:) 18:47, 11 May 2013 (GMT)
494:) 18:08, 11 May 2013 (GMT)
452:) 18:52, 11 May 2013 (GMT)
466:as a likely search term.
599:Please do not modify it.
587:21:16, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
478:14:25, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
66:14:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
437:09:54, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
415:09:32, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
397:20:57, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
380:13:34, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
362:04:45, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
342:21:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
311:21:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
280:21:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
248:20:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
220:19:33, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
210:guidelines possibly?
368:Delete or incubate.
501:page, for example
48:The result was
589:
557:
543:comment added by
344:
313:
282:
618:
601:
583:
574:
570:
556:
537:
511:Yasmina Siadatan
476:
464:Young Apprentice
340:
338:
333:
328:
309:
307:
302:
297:
278:
276:
271:
266:
245:
240:
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
626:
625:
621:
620:
619:
617:
616:
615:
614:
608:deletion review
597:
581:
563:
538:
515:apprenticelover
467:
446:apprenticelover
336:
331:
324:
322:
305:
300:
293:
291:
274:
269:
262:
260:
241:
236:
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
624:
622:
613:
612:
592:
591:
590:
572:
571:
560:
559:
558:
522:
495:
488:Jessicaleuch12
480:
456:
455:
454:
453:
439:
419:
418:
399:
382:
365:
346:
345:
314:
283:
251:
250:
229:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
623:
611:
609:
605:
600:
594:
593:
588:
585:
584:
579:
573:
569:
567:
562:
561:
554:
550:
546:
542:
535:
531:
526:
523:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
503:Simon Ambrose
499:
496:
493:
489:
484:
481:
479:
474:
470:
465:
461:
458:
457:
451:
447:
443:
440:
438:
434:
430:
426:
423:
422:
421:
420:
416:
412:
408:
403:
400:
398:
394:
390:
386:
383:
381:
377:
373:
369:
366:
363:
359:
355:
351:
350:Moderate Keep
348:
347:
343:
339:
334:
329:
327:
320:
315:
312:
308:
303:
298:
296:
289:
284:
281:
277:
272:
267:
265:
258:
253:
252:
249:
246:
244:
239:
233:
230:
227:
224:
223:
222:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
204:WP:NOTABILITY
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:Harry Maxwell
77:
76:
73:
72:Harry Maxwell
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
598:
595:
576:
564:
539:— Preceding
524:
497:
482:
459:
441:
424:
401:
384:
367:
349:
325:
294:
263:
242:
237:
231:
225:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
49:
47:
31:
28:
507:Lee McQueen
165:free images
407:Solution55
354:Solution55
604:talk page
473:talk page
372:1292simon
37:talk page
606:or in a
566:Relisted
553:contribs
541:unsigned
460:Redirect
429:Tiller54
389:Tiller54
208:WP:PROMO
124:View log
39:or in a
582:Faraone
442:Comment
425:Comment
402:Comment
212:Pigduck
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
545:Maxwhr
530:maxwhr
385:Delete
232:Delete
226:Delete
143:Google
101:delete
58:Stifle
50:delete
238:Yinta
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
549:talk
534:talk
525:Keep
519:talk
509:and
498:Keep
492:talk
483:Keep
469:J04n
450:talk
433:talk
411:talk
393:talk
376:talk
358:talk
326:czar
295:czar
264:czar
216:talk
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
62:talk
462:to
193:TWL
122:– (
555:)
551:•
505:,
435:)
413:)
395:)
378:)
360:)
321:.
290:.
259:.
243:n
218:)
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
578:L
547:(
532:(
517:(
490:(
475:)
471:(
448:(
431:(
417:)
409:(
391:(
374:(
364:)
356:(
337:·
332:·
306:·
301:·
275:·
270:·
214:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.