153:
You probably do not know that in wikipedia, in the context of VfD the term "neologism" is applied to neologism that have not entered the mainstream usage yet, i.e., the very "neo"-neologisms, not described anywhere. Which means that writing a wikipedia article about them amounts to
31:
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was
249:
if the term is in common enough usage and the article can be made into something more than a
Wiktionary article. If the article can't be made into more than that by the time VfD is over, though,
201:
shows 9740 hits for
Heterophobia and 12100 for heterophobic. There are even books with this title by authors like Ragan Fox or by Daphne Patai. The word has been used by politicians like
276:. I agree that this article is presently a {{stub}}. However, to imply that it is inherently useless, perhaps based on title alone, (whereas an article discussing
21:
296:
is widespread." I would have to agree with this reasoning (in the case of phobias, sexual or non). Off-topic, name a phobia that doesn't have
263:
9K Google hits - should be notable enough. The BBC thought so, anyway, and if it's good enough for the BBC, it's good enough for me. Also, see
17:
345:
288:, there would be a wikipanic, and at least one person would mention that "the fact that somebody wants to delete article
264:
54:
neologism used by homophobes, doesn't describe a real 'phobia' but is rather an idiotic retort to the use of the word
146:
etc. and we have articles on them. Some people would like to censor every speech that is not convinient to them. --
72:, who wrote a book with this title (it's about sexual harassment, btw, not gay-vs-straight anything) —
303:
221:
77:
240:
192:
162:
59:
155:
254:
344:
Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an
281:
210:
178:
87:
217:
202:
73:
237:
189:
184:
And even more doesn't and probably will never have (look into the article you link:
159:
122:
37:
69:
44:
143:
285:
277:
267:
139:
135:
112:
108:
55:
97:
284:, which I thought we were supposed to avoid exhibiting. If somebody VFD'd
216:
I say again, Daphne Patai's book does not use the word with this meaning.—
147:
96:
non-notable neologism and disruption of
Knowledge (XXG) to make a point.
185:
174:
206:
198:
131:
338:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
323:
324:
173:. ...and rewrite. Knowledge (XXG) has a lot of
8:
304:
158:, which is against the wikipedia policies.
130:. Neologism are also lots of terms such as
280:is undisputedly valuable) suggests a
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
28:
36:(6 deletes, 5 keeps, 1 merge).
1:
209:. Notable enough, I'd say. --
58:. I suggest this be deleted.
369:
224:) 18:26, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
80:) 00:28, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
68:neologism, or redirect to
40:19:33, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
332:07:26, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
257:19:22, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
213:21:11, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
195:23:14, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
181:22:20, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
150:06:34, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
115:07:32, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)
341:Please do not modify it.
270:11:25, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
243:23:14, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
165:23:14, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
100:09:48, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
90:01:22, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
62:00:00, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
292:proves that phenomenon
348:, if it does not; or
300:as a side effect. —
274:Keep, expand greatly
205:and by artists like
34:No consensus (kept)
346:undeletion request
105:merge and redirect
330:
316:
308:
156:original research
360:
343:
328:
326:
320:
317:
310:
306:
368:
367:
363:
362:
361:
359:
358:
357:
356:
339:
322:
314:
282:double standard
48:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
366:
364:
355:
354:
334:
333:
312:
271:
258:
244:
231:
230:
229:
228:
227:
226:
225:
203:Peter Tatchell
168:
167:
166:
125:
116:
101:
91:
81:
63:
47:
42:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
365:
353:
352:this section.
351:
347:
342:
336:
335:
331:
327:
319:
318:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
272:
269:
265:
262:
259:
256:
252:
248:
245:
242:
239:
236:. Neologism.
235:
232:
223:
219:
215:
214:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
196:
194:
191:
187:
183:
182:
180:
176:
172:
169:
164:
161:
157:
152:
151:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
126:
124:
121:- neologism.
120:
117:
114:
110:
106:
102:
99:
95:
92:
89:
85:
82:
79:
75:
71:
67:
64:
61:
57:
53:
50:
49:
46:
43:
41:
39:
35:
23:
19:
349:
340:
337:
302:
301:
297:
293:
289:
273:
260:
255:Seth Mahoney
250:
246:
233:
177:articles. --
170:
127:
118:
104:
93:
83:
70:Daphne Patai
65:
51:
45:Heterophobia
33:
30:
22:Heterophobia
144:genderqueer
113:Sean Curtin
86:neologism.
286:homophobia
278:homophobia
211:Alcidebava
179:Alcidebava
140:drag queen
136:homophobia
109:homophobia
88:JamesBurns
60:Revolución
56:homophobia
218:Wahoofive
103:Possibly
74:Wahoofive
123:CDThieme
38:Scimitar
20: |
307:REAK OF
186:-phobia
175:-phobia
298:denial
251:delete
234:Delete
207:Eminem
199:Google
119:Delete
94:Delete
84:Delete
66:Delete
52:Delete
350:below
268:AlexR
266:. --
238:mikka
190:mikka
160:mikka
132:queer
16:<
325:TALK
315:TURE
261:Keep
253:. -
247:Keep
222:talk
171:Keep
128:Keep
111:. -
98:Axon
78:talk
294:Foo
290:Foo
241:(t)
193:(t)
188:).
163:(t)
148:5ko
107:to
311:UR
142:,
138:,
134:,
329:)
321:(
313:x
309:N
305:F
220:(
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.