436:
300:
530:. Jifeng's best-cited work is with a more famous author, Hoare, but even if we remove Hoare's contributions from the citation record we see citation counts of 128, 94, 88, etc., good enough to convince me of a pass of
578:
was the wise thing to do, and I still think it is. If sufficient opinions emerge (as finally so) that it is notable, hopefully someone edits it properly to show the notability. At least, leave a proper record.
237:
174:
483:
430:
294:
375:
370:
379:
331:
Is this professor sufficiently notable? The article doesn't show it, although I must say that I've been out of the field for too long to have a better informed opinion.
362:
468:
231:
168:
129:
574:
category, which was (and still is somewhat) of a mess. I ran across this article that really didn't show notability. That's why I AfD'ed it. I thought that
615:
535:
65:
451:
418:
366:
134:
315:
555:. Very clear keep as above. Nominator might care to consider the wisdom of editing in fields that he has been "out of for far too long".
538:
whose title follows this one (many of which look like nontrivial reliable sources) seems like strong evidence to me that it's notable. —
282:
412:
358:
17:
408:
276:
571:
534:. And the Chinese Academy of Science membership is almost certainly good enough for #3. As for the book, the existence of
102:
97:
458:
272:
252:
189:
106:
593:
agree with Nlu that listing was the bold thing to do and not inappropriate. Thought the article is a clear keep. --
219:
156:
60:
510:(using Author: He Jifeng + Other: Jifeng He), which is fairly high for a computing scientist working in the area of
322:
89:
518:
has been high; among other things, it has spawned a series of international conferences (under the same name). --
678:
40:
543:
506:
both. He Jifeng is one of the foremost leading computer scientists in China. I find an h-index of 37 using the
491:
424:
619:
213:
150:
55:
288:
674:
36:
209:
146:
598:
560:
659:
631:
602:
588:
564:
547:
522:
495:
475:
344:
71:
539:
487:
444:
308:
245:
182:
259:
196:
519:
472:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
673:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
594:
556:
531:
511:
225:
162:
93:
643:
584:
340:
396:
123:
507:
350:
85:
77:
580:
349:
I am also nominating the related article (a work that he coauthored with
336:
667:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
484:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
392:
388:
384:
119:
115:
111:
443:
307:
244:
181:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
681:). No further edits should be made to this page.
469:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
457:
321:
258:
195:
8:
614:Note: This debate has been included in the
482:Note: This debate has been included in the
467:Note: This debate has been included in the
616:list of China-related deletion discussions
613:
481:
466:
353:, whom I do believe is clearly notable):
66:
7:
56:
24:
516:Unifying Theories of Programming
359:Unifying Theories of Programming
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
536:multiple academic publications
1:
572:Category:People from Shanghai
508:Google code citations gadget
61:
335:unless notability shown. --
698:
670:Please do not modify it.
660:07:15, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
632:12:32, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
603:00:45, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
589:14:32, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
565:00:13, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
548:22:06, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
523:21:41, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
496:23:11, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
476:20:52, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
345:16:44, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
72:16:43, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
595:Michael Scott Cuthbert
570:I was pruning the
634:
601:
498:
478:
689:
672:
657:
656:
653:
650:
647:
628:
625:
622:
597:
514:. The impact of
462:
461:
447:
400:
382:
326:
325:
311:
263:
262:
248:
200:
199:
185:
137:
127:
109:
68:
63:
58:
48:The result was
34:
697:
696:
692:
691:
690:
688:
687:
686:
685:
679:deletion review
668:
654:
651:
648:
645:
644:
626:
623:
620:
404:
373:
357:
268:
205:
142:
133:
100:
84:
81:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
695:
693:
684:
683:
663:
662:
636:
635:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
550:
540:David Eppstein
525:
512:formal methods
500:
499:
488:David Eppstein
479:
464:
401:
329:
328:
265:
202:
139:
80:
75:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
694:
682:
680:
676:
671:
665:
664:
661:
658:
642:per Lambiam.
641:
638:
637:
633:
629:
617:
612:
611:
604:
600:
596:
592:
591:
590:
586:
582:
577:
573:
569:
568:
566:
562:
558:
554:
551:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
526:
524:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
502:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
480:
477:
474:
470:
465:
460:
456:
453:
450:
446:
442:
438:
435:
432:
429:
426:
423:
420:
417:
414:
410:
407:
406:Find sources:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
381:
377:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
355:
354:
352:
347:
346:
342:
338:
334:
324:
320:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
296:
293:
290:
287:
284:
281:
278:
274:
271:
270:Find sources:
266:
261:
257:
254:
251:
247:
243:
239:
236:
233:
230:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
211:
208:
207:Find sources:
203:
198:
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:Find sources:
140:
136:
131:
125:
121:
117:
113:
108:
104:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
82:
79:
76:
74:
73:
70:
69:
64:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
669:
666:
639:
627:PEANUTBUTTER
575:
552:
527:
515:
503:
454:
448:
440:
433:
427:
421:
415:
405:
348:
332:
330:
318:
312:
304:
297:
291:
285:
279:
269:
255:
249:
241:
234:
228:
222:
216:
206:
192:
186:
178:
171:
165:
159:
153:
143:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
431:free images
295:free images
232:free images
169:free images
557:Xxanthippe
532:WP:PROF#C1
351:Tony Hoare
675:talk page
528:Keep both
86:He Jifeng
78:He Jifeng
37:talk page
677:or in a
130:View log
39:or in a
520:Lambiam
473:Lambiam
437:WP refs
425:scholar
376:protect
371:history
301:WP refs
289:scholar
238:WP refs
226:scholar
175:WP refs
163:scholar
103:protect
98:history
599:(talk)
409:Google
380:delete
333:Delete
273:Google
210:Google
147:Google
107:delete
618:. ★☆
471:. --
452:JSTOR
413:books
397:views
389:watch
385:links
316:JSTOR
277:books
253:JSTOR
214:books
190:JSTOR
151:books
135:Stats
124:views
116:watch
112:links
16:<
640:Keep
621:DUCK
585:talk
576:that
561:talk
553:Keep
544:talk
504:Keep
492:talk
445:FENS
419:news
393:logs
367:talk
363:edit
341:talk
309:FENS
283:news
246:FENS
220:news
183:FENS
157:news
120:logs
94:talk
90:edit
50:Keep
655:ve
649:e S
630:☆★
581:Nlu
486:. —
459:TWL
337:Nlu
323:TWL
260:TWL
197:TWL
132:•
128:– (
652:te
646:Th
624:IS
587:)
579:--
567:.
563:)
546:)
494:)
439:)
395:|
391:|
387:|
383:|
378:|
374:|
369:|
365:|
343:)
303:)
240:)
177:)
122:|
118:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
52:.
583:(
559:(
542:(
490:(
463:)
455:·
449:·
441:·
434:·
428:·
422:·
416:·
411:(
403:(
399:)
361:(
339:(
327:)
319:·
313:·
305:·
298:·
292:·
286:·
280:·
275:(
267:(
264:)
256:·
250:·
242:·
235:·
229:·
223:·
217:·
212:(
204:(
201:)
193:·
187:·
179:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
149:(
141:(
138:)
126:)
88:(
67:P
62:A
57:T
54:⇒
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.