Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Helen Hollick - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

622:"Countdown to conquest. Today, one could be forgiven for thinking that Tony Blair's Labour government had invented spindoctoring. In her epic story, retelling the tide of events that led to the Norman Conquest, Helen Hollick shows us the truth. England 1044. The Godwine family is one of the most powerful families in England. As Earl Godwine's six sons start to reach maturity, so they are rewarded with power and influence. Harold Godwine, skilled at both the machinations of court and at fighting, has inherited all his father's diplomatic skills - but none of his lust for battle. In France, William, bastard son of a duke, is brought up at the court, but trained to be a soldier. Attractive and arrogant, he is an exciting leader, inspiring his men to ever greater victories. 614:"Local author Helen Hollick has achieved a miracle by making this reviewer sit still and silent for a whole weekend, stirring only to eat toast whilst devouring Helen's gripping book. And it's a damn big one at that, sweeping from England to France, from Wessex to Normandy, following the fortunes of Harold Godwine, Earl of Wessex and later King of England, and William, Duke of Normandy. Treachery, arrogance, lies and weakness contrast with courage, honesty, strength and of course, plenty of love interest to make you weep. Illegitimacy, fallen kings, plenty of hunting scenes and some great sea journeys and bloody battles; we follow the fortunes of the cast from 1044 right up to the Battle of Hastings itself, which is brilliantly recreated. 702:. If she can send me the information we can use to establish notability, I will be happy to add it to the story. I've also changed my vote to "Keep", basically on faith that we can get the right confirmation in the article (presumably from articles not on the Internet). I think if we do this that it would satisfy editors here, and I hope any administrator would extend this debate if need be, for a few days if that's what it takes to get it done. 344:. Her book "Come and Tell Me" was published by HarperCollins. I assume her books went out of print and that she started reissuing them herself, which shouldn't sway us one way or the other, frankly. Worthy authors will do the same thing. At this point I'm neutral on whether to keep or delete. I think that depends on some kind of independent recognition of her talent, doesn't it? At least some book reviews, I suppose. 562:
published, my Arthurian Trilogy and Harold the King are re-published editions of out of print books published previously by William Heineman. I trust you are not going to penalise respected authors who wish to keep their books in print and who have no choice but to "self publish" when their mainstream books fall out of print! We do have a living to make, and our back lists are very important.
633:"This re-telling of the events leading up to the Battle of Hastings in 1066 through the eyes of the men and women involved mixes together historical fact with plenty of personality. Hollick, whose previous novels were about Arthurian Britain, juxtaposes the stories of Harold and William as events conspire to produce the Norman Conquest. 629:
Following the battle, William's spindoctors justify the atrocities that have taken place and his claim to the throne. They advise him to build Battle Abbey as a penance, and ensure that all information comes from Norman sources. In this masterly and colourful recreation, Helen Hollick weaves together
610:
Whether the events described actually happened this way is unimportant, that the reader feels instinctively that they could have happened this way is the sign of a superior novel. This is a fabulous read and one to be recommended unreservedly - even to committed "Williamites". If only all historical
561:
BookForce UK is my printer, I am published, now, by Discovered Diamonds, which is the new, small independent mainstream branch of BookForce. You are confusing self publish with vanity publish. I have a full mainstream contract with this company. ONLY my latest novel "Sea Witch" is "technically" self
625:
Though still precociously young, his fame begins to spread. When events in England take a dramatic and bloody turn, the Godwines are forced into exile. They must fight their way back into favour, and a power struggle ensues, which will eventually make Harold king. But William has already seen the
617:
Helen also provides at the end an explanation for some of her plot "changes" - for example, her Harold is not killed by the arrow in the eye at all, but is beheaded - on the grounds that as most of the information concerning the battle and William's claim to the English throne comes from Norman
575:
I am about to go on my second lecture tour in the Netherlands, (subject, Harold the King) I have been guest speaker on several occasions for the Historical Novel Society. I have written several articles for various magazines - I refer you to my articles etc on my web site.
636:
What is most inspiring about Hollick is that she can produce such a mammoth book from a household where she is the only reader - both her husband and daughter suffering from severe dyslexia." Cliff Moore, Dorset Evening Echo - Weymouth - 28 Oct 2000
557:
COMMENT. I am Helen Hollick. I am a respected and well known author of mainstream historical fiction. I do not know how to use this site, I trust I have not made any errors with this insertion. Until today I was unaware I had an entry here.
630:
the history of a powerful family of noblemen, with that of the aggressive bastard of Normandy - culminating in the fierce and tragic battle which changed the course of England's history." Bolton Evening News, 21 Oct 2000.
565:
My novel A Hollow Crown remains in print with William Heineman. My children's personal safety book Come and Tell Me is published by Happy Cat Books. This book was the official Home Office safety Book for ten years.
597:"Weaves together fact, legend and inspired imagination to create a world so real we can breathe the smoke of its fires and revel into Romano-British lust for life, love and honour" Historical Novels Review 455:. Self-publicity is something a little cleanup can handle. The article is short enough that a full re-write would be simple. In particular, the quotes from reviews need to be removed for copyright and 419:
but it's extremely short, not a full article. I'd change my mind if someone could point me to at least a couple of full-fledged articles about her somewhere, which I think would satisfy WP notability.
145: 680:. Hm, I'm willing to give it you the benefit of the doubt and I'll probably end up withdrawing the suggestion to delete once I have time to give this a more in-depth look. The articles 459:
purposes- it's kind of silly to base critical reception on a quote which the author decides to present on her website. It'd be much easier to have access to the full reviews. --
124: 443:
After being contacted to review my delete vote since the introduction of some sources, I still think this is a valiant effort towards self-publicity. I affirm my vote. /
579:
The Historical Novel Society is an international highly acclaimed society. Your information regarding my books, I am afraid, is inaccurate and out of date.
411:
because I can't find book reviews that I can identify as from sources other than blogs, or other coverage besides the one TBC found. I did find
324:
She is NOT entirely self published. It took a little digging, but "Arrow/Childrens" is an imprint of RandomHouse in the UK, and according to
668: 132:
The prod was contested several weeks ago with the comment "I disagree". So I'm bringing it here. I believe the subject doesn't satisfy
185: 180: 604:"An epic tale... Helen Hollick has done her homework meticulously and her story gleams with convincing Dark Age detail." Ms. London 17: 189: 97: 92: 591:"Helen Hollick joins the ranks of Rosemary Sutcliff, Mary Stewart and Marion Bradley with this splendid novel" Pendragon Magazine 291:. As TBC notes, things look self published. I can't find much in the way of reviews (and no reviews from publications of any type) 101: 716:
Can agree with withdrawal in that, now, with the sources that have been presented, it can be cleaned up to conform with policy.
172: 84: 735: 36: 588:
Hollick's interpretation is bold, affecting and well worth fighting to defend." Publishers Weekly, November 11 1996
585:"A wonderful book...breathes new life into an ancient legend" Best selling Historical fiction author Sharon Penman 601:"A uniquely compelling novel which is bound to have a resounding and lasting impact on Arthurian fiction." Books 734:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
664: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
698:
I've just sent an email to Helen Hollick through www.helenhollick.net. A copy of the email is at my talk page
325: 534:, has been re-written and sourced well. Could use some more work, but certainly no longer warrants deletion. 312:
Due to the new sources and vote changes that borders WP:SNOW, I think we should keep and rewrite it instead.
656: 720: 706: 688: 594:"Uniquely compelling...bound to have a resounding and lasting impact on Arthurian fiction" Books Magazine 552: 496: 463: 447: 435: 423: 390: 373: 348: 316: 301: 280: 265: 231: 214: 66: 660: 490: 386:
Yes, but I get the impression that the majority weren't "only" self-published. Minor point anyway.
176: 149: 569:
I am a member of the Society of Authors. I am co-script writer for a pre-production movie "1066"
88: 626:
weakness which exists in England ... the Battle of Hastings is the terrible and bloody result.
412: 699: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
456: 508: 485: 480: 242: 148:
or are provided in the article are just a list of books. The single substantial source was
133: 49: 137: 717: 277: 245:
the notability of the author. Also, the majority of her books are only self-published (
168: 158:
Most of her books' articles were prodded or speedily deleted as spam. Also nominating:
476: 141: 444: 432: 367: 259: 80: 72: 572:
You will find plenty of up to date information about myself at www.helenhollick.net
703: 420: 387: 345: 206: 118: 618:
sources its veracity is questionable. Compelling stuff." SW Magazine, March 2001
685: 535: 511: 460: 228: 211: 152:
from a (minor?) historical fiction society detailing a visit with Ms. Hollick.
313: 298: 684:
have to be rewritten substantially for Knowledge (XXG) guidelines though. --
582:
a selection of reviews from my initial publication with William Heineman:
611:
fiction could be this good." Sara Wilson, Historical Novel Society, 2001.
359: 251: 643:
I will be happy to provide you with any other information you require
475:
I too am chaging my vote to keep, now refs have been added it meets
728:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
246: 353:
I never said she was entirely self published, only that a
202: 198: 194: 114: 110: 106: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 738:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 243:sources or references are evident to verify 276:no sources, couldn't find any notability. 293:Given the information below, I change to 247:BookForce UK is a self-publishing company 223:. Sources have been presented. I suggest 144:. Most of the sources that I found via 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 405:(for reasons, see my comments below) 646:I can be contacated via my website 24: 328:that is who published her books 479:and I think it gets a pass on 1: 46:keep (nomination withdrawn) 757: 721:23:09, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 707:01:16, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 689:22:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 553:23:18, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 528:19:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 497:18:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 464:22:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 448:22:22, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 436:09:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 424:03:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 391:03:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 374:03:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 349:03:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 317:01:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 302:00:55, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 281:00:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 266:00:44, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 232:20:39, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 215:00:38, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 67:04:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 731:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 221:Withdrawing nomination 649:www.helenhollick.net 136:and lacks sufficient 507:per above reason by 357:of her books were.-- 310:non-notable author. 225:rewrite and cleanup 342:Shadow of the King 338:Pendragon's Banner 673: 659:comment added by 748: 733: 672: 653: 550: 547: 544: 541: 538: 526: 523: 520: 517: 514: 493: 488: 417:Rare Book Review 370: 362: 262: 254: 210: 192: 138:reliable sources 122: 104: 64: 58: 54: 34: 756: 755: 751: 750: 749: 747: 746: 745: 744: 736:deletion review 729: 654: 548: 545: 542: 539: 536: 524: 521: 518: 515: 512: 491: 486: 368: 366: 360: 334:Harold the King 260: 258: 252: 183: 167: 95: 79: 76: 60: 56: 50: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 754: 752: 741: 740: 724: 723: 710: 709: 692: 691: 661:86.144.188.151 640: 621: 607: 600: 500: 499: 473:Change to Keep 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 426: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 379: 378: 377: 376: 364: 319: 304: 269: 268: 256: 236: 235: 234: 169:The Kingmaking 129: 128: 75: 70: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 753: 743: 742: 739: 737: 732: 726: 725: 722: 719: 715: 712: 711: 708: 705: 701: 697: 694: 693: 690: 687: 683: 679: 676: 675: 674: 670: 666: 662: 658: 652:Helen Hollick 650: 647: 644: 641: 638: 634: 631: 627: 623: 619: 615: 612: 608: 605: 602: 598: 595: 592: 589: 586: 583: 580: 577: 573: 570: 567: 563: 559: 555: 554: 551: 533: 529: 527: 510: 506: 498: 495: 494: 489: 482: 478: 474: 471: 465: 462: 458: 454: 451: 450: 449: 446: 442: 439: 438: 437: 434: 431:per above. / 430: 427: 425: 422: 418: 414: 410: 409: 404: 400: 399: 392: 389: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 375: 372: 371: 363: 356: 352: 351: 350: 347: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 320: 318: 315: 311: 309: 305: 303: 300: 296: 292: 290: 286: 285: 284: 283: 282: 279: 275: 267: 264: 263: 255: 248: 244: 240: 237: 233: 230: 226: 222: 219: 218: 217: 216: 213: 208: 204: 200: 196: 191: 187: 182: 178: 174: 170: 165: 164: 161: 160: 159: 154: 153: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 126: 120: 116: 112: 108: 103: 99: 94: 90: 86: 82: 81:Helen Hollick 78: 77: 74: 73:Helen Hollick 71: 69: 68: 65: 63: 59: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 730: 727: 713: 695: 681: 677: 655:— Preceding 651: 648: 645: 642: 639: 635: 632: 628: 624: 620: 616: 613: 609: 606: 603: 599: 596: 593: 590: 587: 584: 581: 578: 574: 571: 568: 564: 560: 556: 531: 530:Changing to 504: 502: 501: 484: 472: 452: 440: 428: 416: 407: 406: 402: 358: 354: 341: 337: 333: 329: 321: 307: 306: 297:. My bad. -- 294: 288: 287: 273: 271: 270: 250: 238: 224: 220: 166: 163: 162: 157: 156: 155: 131: 130: 61: 55: 51: 45: 43: 31: 28: 142:attribution 401:CHANGE TO 330:Kingmaking 150:this piece 718:Alex43223 441:Follow up 413:this item 326:this site 278:Alex43223 669:contribs 657:unsigned 445:Blaxthos 433:Blaxthos 355:majority 125:View log 704:Noroton 696:Comment 678:Comment 457:WP:NPOV 453:Comment 421:Noroton 388:Noroton 346:Noroton 322:Comment 186:protect 181:history 98:protect 93:history 686:Wafulz 505:Delete 492:addict 481:WP:BIO 461:Wafulz 429:delete 408:Delete 308:Delete 289:Delete 274:Delete 239:Delete 229:Wafulz 212:Wafulz 190:delete 146:Google 134:WP:BIO 102:delete 509:Telly 487:Telly 369:talk? 314:Wooyi 299:Hobit 261:talk? 241:. No 207:views 199:watch 195:links 119:views 111:watch 107:links 16:< 714:Keep 700:here 682:will 665:talk 532:KEEP 477:WP:V 403:KEEP 340:and 295:Keep 249:).-- 227:. -- 203:logs 177:talk 173:edit 140:for 115:logs 89:talk 85:edit 52:Buck 415:in 361:TBC 253:TBC 123:– ( 62:ofg 57:ets 671:) 667:• 540:mg 516:mg 336:, 332:, 205:| 201:| 197:| 193:| 188:| 184:| 179:| 175:| 117:| 113:| 109:| 105:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 48:. 663:( 549:6 546:1 543:9 537:B 525:6 522:1 519:9 513:B 503:* 483:. 365:Φ 272:* 257:Φ 209:) 171:( 127:) 121:) 83:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Bucketsofg
04:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Helen Hollick
Helen Hollick
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
WP:BIO
reliable sources
attribution
Google
this piece
The Kingmaking
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.