281:("the source addresses the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content"). Incidentally, you need to go to the last page of the Google search to get the true number of Ghits - the number on the front page is always wildly out. In this case, the true number of Ghits isn't 34,500 but
256:
from the Jewish World Review. An organisation which has been running continuously for 110 years can't be judged on google hits alone but this one does get 34,500. I don't really understand the nomination rationale, it admits there are multiple independent sources for this association but says they
249:
which said "Hephzibah
Children's Association, named after a biblical benefactor, operates a small facility funded by the mostly well-to-do citizens of Oak Park; it accommodates children ages 3 to 11 for however long it takes them to be adopted, thus sparing them the foster-care shuffle. Even more
144:, but I'm not quite sure how. Yes, there are sources, but all they seem to do is prove the place exists — I can't see how this warrants an article. Orphaned stub article, and seems to have been since its creation, with no sign of anyone expanding it for a year
257:
can be discounted because they merely prove it exists. It's an orphanage and foster care association which does a lot of work in the local community as all the sources attest, does it have to have its own space programme to get in wikipedia?
141:
79:
250:
unusual, it allows them to veto adoptive parents they don't like. "They stay here until they find a place they are comfortable with," says executive director Mary Anne Brown." There's also this story
273:
All the references - those you've given, those on the article and those I can find on Google - just mention the orphanage tangentially; thus — as I said in my original nom — this undoubtedly passes
133:
106:
101:
110:
93:
317:
282:
163:
327:
303:
261:
238:
215:
200:
176:
63:
17:
227:
tag. I think it's possibly notable if the article could be extended. I'm somewhat reluctant to see a child charity deleted.
97:
89:
69:
346:
36:
345:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
251:
295:
155:
247:
277:
in that there are plenty of sources to prove it exists, but I'm unable to find anything to satisfy
194:
253:
about a man who was raised in the orphanage in the 1930s who talks about it at length and this
258:
60:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
287:
212:
147:
254:
224:
228:
173:
49:
127:
186:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
324:
278:
274:
246:
It's an organisation which was founded in 1897 and was covered in Time
Magazine
191:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (
339:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
172:
Non-notable. I don't see any hope of justifying this one.
123:
119:
115:
80:
Articles for deletion/Hephzibah
Children's Association
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
349:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
316:: This debate has been included in the
77:
7:
76:
318:list of Illinois-related deletions
24:
211:just doesn't seem to be notable.
90:Hephzibah Children's Association
70:Hephzibah Children's Association
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
328:23:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
64:00:19, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
304:09:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
262:01:29, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
239:18:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
216:17:18, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
201:12:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
283:a rather less impressive 242
177:02:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
164:02:29, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
68:
366:
342:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
75:AfDs for this article:
330:
321:
300:
203:
198:
160:
62:
357:
344:
322:
312:
302:
296:
293:
290:
235:
232:
192:
190:
188:
162:
156:
153:
150:
131:
113:
59:
56:
53:
34:
365:
364:
360:
359:
358:
356:
355:
354:
353:
347:deletion review
340:
325:John Vandenberg
291:
288:
285:
233:
230:
184:
151:
148:
145:
104:
88:
85:
73:
54:
51:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
363:
361:
352:
351:
334:
332:
331:
309:
308:
307:
306:
265:
264:
241:
223:- I added the
218:
205:
204:
189:
181:
180:
179:
142:an earlier AfD
138:
137:
84:
83:
82:
74:
72:
67:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
362:
350:
348:
343:
337:
336:
335:
329:
326:
319:
315:
311:
310:
305:
301:
299:
298:(talk to me!)
294:
284:
280:
276:
272:
269:
268:
267:
266:
263:
260:
255:
252:
248:
245:
242:
240:
237:
236:
226:
222:
219:
217:
214:
210:
207:
206:
202:
197:
196:
187:
183:
182:
178:
175:
171:
168:
167:
166:
165:
161:
159:
158:(talk to me!)
154:
143:
135:
129:
125:
121:
117:
112:
108:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
86:
81:
78:
71:
66:
65:
61:
58:
57:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
341:
338:
333:
313:
297:
270:
259:Nick mallory
243:
229:
220:
208:
193:
185:
169:
157:
139:
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
213:Realkyhick
195:talk to me
140:Survived
134:View log
271:Comment
221:Comment
209:Delete,
174:MarkBul
107:protect
102:history
234:redrun
225:WP:ICU
170:Delete
111:delete
46:delete
292:scent
289:iride
152:scent
149:iride
128:views
120:watch
116:links
16:<
314:Note
279:WP:N
275:WP:V
244:Keep
124:logs
98:talk
94:edit
52:Citi
323:--
320:.
286:—
146:—
132:– (
55:Cat
199:)
126:|
122:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
48:.
231:1
136:)
130:)
92:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.