160:: "The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." Zimmerman meets that as a lead production designer for numerous Star Trek tv series and movies. Article needs expansion, but being a stub isn't a reason to delete.--
219:
See
Manticore's comment below. I think you are not seeing the forest for the trees. Independent sources are used to weed out conflict of interest, peacocking, spam, and blatant advertising, none of which applies when using material from a Star Trek magazine in an article about a technical production
284:
is an interview on the BBC. Also a tribute to him on the movie DVDs. Which are independent of him, if not independent of Trek. And in this case, I think SPS are viable, given the nature of the franchise. But really, a little discretion in nominations would be appropriate here.
173:
Has
Zimmerman or his work specifically been "the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews"? Lots of people work on series, even influential series, but that in and of itself doesn't meet notability guidelines.
137:- The editor seems to be working on other articles, and doesn't seem to be interested in this anymore. However, Google hits counts over 900,000, and also has a article on the Star Trek wiki. That may not matter here, but weak keep for now. --
110:
83:
78:
87:
70:
224:
which is the key here. It's not like we're sourcing from a fanzine
Zimmerman started himself. You wouldn't suggest we exclude from, say,
17:
263:
190:- Well quoted, profiled, and interviewed in official Star Trek websites and magazines. FYI, Memory Alpha has this to say:
305:
36:
289:
270:
253:
232:
214:
197:
178:
164:
148:
128:
52:
124:. Prod removed by editor saying he'd be back in 24 hours to work on the article; that was almost two weeks ago.
304:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
267:
250:
74:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
286:
49:
66:
58:
282:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
157:
121:
143:
211:
175:
161:
125:
104:
229:
225:
194:
191:
247:
210:
resources. Official Star Trek websites and magazines are not independent.
298:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
138:
100:
96:
92:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
228:all sources from NBC because he worked for them?
308:). No further edits should be made to this page.
220:person. The magazine is still independent of
8:
249:would seem to suggest that he's notable. -
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
246:and improve. Four Emmy nominations
24:
264:Art Directors Guild Awards 1996
206:Note that notability requires
1:
290:17:14, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
271:23:19, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
254:23:17, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
233:18:44, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
215:22:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
198:19:37, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
179:22:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
165:19:31, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
149:17:23, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
129:17:12, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
53:01:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
325:
262:Also was a winner at the
301:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
268:Hit bull, win steak
251:Hit bull, win steak
67:Herman F. Zimmerman
59:Herman F. Zimmerman
156:-Easily fulfills
316:
303:
287:FrozenPurpleCube
146:
141:
108:
90:
34:
324:
323:
319:
318:
317:
315:
314:
313:
312:
306:deletion review
299:
144:
139:
81:
65:
62:
50:Fuhghettaboutit
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
322:
320:
311:
310:
294:
293:
292:
276:
275:
274:
273:
257:
256:
240:
239:
238:
237:
236:
235:
201:
200:
184:
183:
182:
181:
168:
167:
151:
115:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
321:
309:
307:
302:
296:
295:
291:
288:
283:
281:
278:
277:
272:
269:
265:
261:
260:
259:
258:
255:
252:
248:
245:
242:
241:
234:
231:
227:
223:
218:
217:
216:
213:
209:
205:
204:
203:
202:
199:
196:
192:
189:
186:
185:
180:
177:
172:
171:
170:
169:
166:
163:
159:
155:
152:
150:
147:
142:
136:
133:
132:
131:
130:
127:
123:
119:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
300:
297:
279:
243:
221:
207:
187:
153:
134:
117:
116:
45:
43:
31:
28:
222:the subject
208:independent
226:Tom Brokaw
135:Weak Keep
212:Otto4711
176:Otto4711
162:Fyre2387
145:irohisat
126:Otto4711
120:- fails
111:View log
84:protect
79:history
158:WP:BIO
122:WP:BIO
118:Delete
88:delete
230:Wl219
195:Wl219
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
280:Keep
244:Keep
188:Keep
154:Keep
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
46:keep
266:. -
109:– (
48:.--
193:.
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
140:H
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.