Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/High-stakes testing - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

189:, and not just three English words used with their ordinary meaning. Can you speak specifically to that? Say, with sources that indicate that researchers have isolated a specific concept for which they've agreed to use this terminology? If you could convince me on that point I'd withdraw the nomination (but would suggest that something about it be added to the article). -- 211:. The only uncertainty is whether to hyphenate or not. You might also check the Google results above. Personally, I've seen and heard dozens of news reports on the topic, and I've never heard it called anything else. Education news sources like EdWeek have lots of articles on high-stakes testing. I'd say it's as much a term of art as "ozone layer". 168:, which mandates such testing in U.S. schools. Some of the examples in the article may not be the best, but the overview looks pretty sound, and the summary of major sticking points at the end seems right on target. The article definitely needs more sourcing, but the notability of the topic would be difficult or impossible to contest. 233:. That can be a formula for an article that can hardly avoid "original research by synthesis". But the term does seem to have a large enough footprint that just deleting the article no longer seems a good option. I would just appeal to those who work on it to be extra scrupulous about avoiding original synthesis. -- 133:
Removed prod, personal essay. Author added a few sources in response to prod, but none of them gave any solid evidence that they were doing anything other than using ordinary English words with their usual meaning.
71: 204: 125: 98: 93: 102: 85: 161: 17: 157: 263: 36: 185:
While it's possible I was a bit hasty on this nom, what I'd like to see is something indicating that it's a genuine
216: 173: 242: 220: 198: 177: 143: 55: 262:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
165: 89: 52: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
212: 169: 238: 194: 139: 81: 61: 49: 164:. At least in the U.S., high-stakes testing is a major educational issue, made more so by Bush's 207:
search turned up 1,448 results, and at first blush, nearly all of them seem to include the term
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
234: 190: 135: 119: 229:
high-stakes testing, but it's not quite as clear that they all agree on exactly
225:
I'm still a little uneasy with this; it seems like a lot of people are talking
160:
turned up 221,000 results, and the first one is from the widely recognized
256:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
115: 111: 107: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 266:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 72:Articles for deletion/High-stakes testing 69: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 68: 162:American Psychological Association 24: 1: 243:04:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 221:04:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 199:03:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 178:03:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 144:22:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC) 56:05:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 46:Keep (nomination withdrawn) 283: 259:Please do not modify it. 203:Here is one example: An 166:No Child Left Behind Act 32:Please do not modify it. 67:AfDs for this article: 209:high-stakes testing 148:withdraw nomination 82:High-stakes testing 62:High-stakes testing 274: 261: 123: 105: 34: 282: 281: 277: 276: 275: 273: 272: 271: 270: 264:deletion review 257: 96: 80: 77: 65: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 280: 278: 269: 268: 252: 251: 250: 249: 248: 247: 246: 245: 130: 129: 76: 75: 74: 66: 64: 59: 50:Metropolitan90 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 279: 267: 265: 260: 254: 253: 244: 240: 236: 232: 228: 224: 223: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 201: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 181: 180: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 158:Google search 155: 152: 151: 150: 149: 146: 145: 141: 137: 127: 121: 117: 113: 109: 104: 100: 95: 91: 87: 83: 79: 78: 73: 70: 63: 60: 58: 57: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 258: 255: 230: 226: 208: 186: 182: 154:Strong keep. 153: 147: 132: 131: 45: 43: 31: 28: 187:term of art 231:what it is 205:Amazon.com 235:Trovatore 191:Trovatore 136:Trovatore 213:Valerius 170:Valerius 126:View log 183:comment 99:protect 94:history 103:delete 53:(talk) 227:about 120:views 112:watch 108:links 16:< 239:talk 217:talk 195:talk 174:talk 140:talk 116:logs 90:talk 86:edit 124:– ( 241:) 219:) 197:) 176:) 156:A 142:) 118:| 114:| 110:| 106:| 101:| 97:| 92:| 88:| 48:. 237:( 215:( 193:( 172:( 138:( 128:) 122:) 84:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Metropolitan90
(talk)
05:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
High-stakes testing
Articles for deletion/High-stakes testing
High-stakes testing
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Trovatore
talk
22:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Google search
American Psychological Association
No Child Left Behind Act
Valerius
talk
03:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Trovatore
talk
03:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.