310:, it would be helpful if they could do so. Multiple articles in major news sources over a series of several years suggest this isn't an ordinary thesis. It is standard for U.S. presidents and presidential candidates to have their personal lives covered in detail on Knowledge (XXG), which of course is only possible because the wider media do likewise.
354:
While the paper is not notable as an academic work, it is notable because it has been extensively written about. There are adequate sources to write it in a neutral manner. A lot of
Hillary-haters have unfairly used her connection with Alinsky to smear her, which has added to the notability of the
395:
An article like this, while it has sufficient coverage in reliable sources, really needs to be completely neutral or it can become a coatrack in no time. A quick glance at the article seems to show that it gives a lot of weight to views criticizing the withholding of the thesis, without noting that
196:
Unnotable paper. There have been calls to delete or merge this article before on its talk page. It's already summarized in the
Hillary Clinton article as: "Rodham wrote her senior thesis, a critique of the tactics of radical community organizer Saul Alinsky, under Professor Schechter. (Years later,
280:- The interest in the thesis seems to stem solely from when it was unavailable, so I think its mention in the Hillary Clinton article is sufficient enough. The paper itself doesn't appear notable, even if its article is well sourced and written. For reference, here is the previous and unsuccessful
434:
I do not think it gives undue weight. The fact that not releasing it was criticized is important to the story and no reason for keeping the thesis sealed has been provided. It should be pointed out in the article however that the suspicions of the anti-Hillary commentators that it showed her
372:. An interesting subject that a substantial number of people would like to read about, judging by page views in excess of a thousand a day. The fact that it was once unavailable, and is now available, does not stem the notability deriving from its period of unavailability.
449:
I don't disagree and I wasn't arguing for deletion. I do think the article would be bettered by noting the partisan nature of many of the critics, and, as noted above, that the thesis did not turn to be a strong defense of
Alinsky's ideas.
165:
518:, coverage in independent reliable secondary sources. It is also information in the public interest. I agree that some of the sources are biased, but the article should be edited to maintain neutrality, not deleted.
333:. Too many reliable third-party sources about this. This article was created in 2007; nominating it for deletion only 11 days before the US presidential election seems strange to me. At least two editors
592:. Temporally notable as the paper itself is a talking point during the elections. Perhaps revisit after the elections, but this has been reference in several discussions in which I've been embroiled.
159:
118:
217:
197:
while she was first lady, access to her thesis was restricted at the request of the White House and it became the subject of some speculation. The thesis was later released.)"
257:
237:
502:
it will just be recreated in three weeks seems like bureaucracy for bureaucracy's sake. I'd suggest closing or withdrawing this AFD, and renominating in in a month. ‑
91:
86:
95:
125:
78:
473:. Due to the potential appearance of politically-based bias, it would be wise to defer discussion of this topic entirely (and thus, a temporary
180:
494:. Regardless of arguments over whether this has received enough coverage in its own right, if Clinton wins the election this will become
147:
546:: (Political positions of Ralph Nader, political positions of Jill Stein, political positions of Cynthia McKinney). For info, Socks
17:
414:
article on a controversial topic can become a coatrack for partisan views; the solution is careful policing of the article content.
82:
498:
notable in its own right as a political work written by a US President. Deleting something when (at the time of writing) there's a
281:
618:
601:
584:
559:
506:
486:
459:
444:
429:
405:
387:
364:
346:
325:
296:
269:
249:
229:
209:
141:
60:
525:
137:
74:
66:
52:, with some suggestions that the article can be re-nominated after the election, when its notability may have changed.
637:
40:
265:
245:
225:
187:
440:
360:
205:
519:
318:
313:
355:
paper and makes this article useful for readers since it provides a fair account of what she actually wrote.
410:
That sounds like an editing issue to be fixed within the article, not an argument for or against deletion.
261:
241:
221:
201:
153:
633:
614:
36:
555:
436:
356:
579:
478:
342:
173:
542:' page this page seems like a waste of space, unlike the pages deleted by the administrator named
482:
435:
support of
Alinsky turned out to be false. But as BD2412 says, any weight issues can be fixed.
57:
568:
455:
401:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
632:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
610:
424:
382:
291:
515:
307:
551:
543:
503:
334:
572:
338:
597:
53:
571:
in her biography article and this feels like a coatrack or POV fork in the making.
451:
397:
567:
Not notable either intrinsically or in Sec'y
Clinton's life. Discussion would be
112:
539:
415:
373:
285:
396:
many of the views expressed are from partisan sources (Brock, Noonan, Olson).
593:
499:
626:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
200:
so I think deleting or redirecting this is better than a merge.
306:. The nominator hasn't advanced a reason why this article is
335:
left arguments on the talkpage to keep the article in 2014
535:
198:
108:
104:
100:
172:
186:
609:extensive, intensive coverage in RS passes WP:GNG.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
640:). No further edits should be made to this page.
218:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
258:list of Education-related deletion discussions
238:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
8:
256:Note: This debate has been included in the
236:Note: This debate has been included in the
216:Note: This debate has been included in the
477:) until after the conclusion of elections.
255:
235:
215:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
514:. This is notable, in the sense of
24:
550:was the Clinton family's cat.
1:
619:07:12, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
602:00:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
585:00:19, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
560:16:59, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
507:09:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
487:21:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
460:22:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
445:19:23, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
430:17:53, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
406:17:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
388:16:23, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
365:16:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
347:14:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
326:13:54, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
297:09:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
270:05:56, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
250:05:56, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
230:05:56, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
210:04:58, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
75:Hillary Rodham senior thesis
67:Hillary Rodham senior thesis
61:17:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
657:
629:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
536:Donald Trump's hair
324:
272:
262:Shawn in Montreal
252:
242:Shawn in Montreal
232:
222:Shawn in Montreal
648:
631:
577:
522:
422:
380:
321:
316:
311:
308:just not notable
294:
288:
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
34:
656:
655:
651:
650:
649:
647:
646:
645:
644:
638:deletion review
627:
573:
520:
416:
374:
319:
314:
292:
286:
202:Emily Goldstein
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
654:
652:
643:
642:
622:
621:
604:
587:
562:
529:
521:Sławomir Biały
509:
492:Temporary keep
489:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
390:
367:
349:
328:
315:IgnorantArmies
300:
299:
282:merge proposal
274:
273:
253:
233:
194:
193:
130:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
653:
641:
639:
635:
630:
624:
623:
620:
616:
612:
608:
605:
603:
599:
595:
591:
588:
586:
583:
582:
578:
576:
570:
566:
563:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
530:
527:
523:
517:
513:
510:
508:
505:
501:
497:
493:
490:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
469:
461:
457:
453:
448:
447:
446:
442:
438:
433:
432:
431:
428:
427:
423:
421:
420:
413:
409:
408:
407:
403:
399:
394:
391:
389:
386:
385:
381:
379:
378:
371:
368:
366:
362:
358:
353:
350:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
329:
327:
323:
322:
317:
309:
305:
302:
301:
298:
295:
289:
283:
279:
276:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
254:
251:
247:
243:
239:
234:
231:
227:
223:
219:
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
199:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
628:
625:
606:
589:
580:
574:
564:
547:
534:: Like the
531:
511:
495:
491:
474:
470:
425:
418:
417:
411:
392:
383:
376:
375:
369:
351:
330:
312:
303:
277:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
49:
47:
31:
28:
611:E.M.Gregory
331:Strong Keep
160:free images
552:SashiRolls
544:Neutrality
504:Iridescent
500:76% chance
634:talk page
575:SPECIFICO
538:page and
339:Zigzig20s
37:talk page
636:or in a
569:WP:UNDUE
496:de facto
479:Tianmang
119:View log
54:Bishonen
39:or in a
532:Comment
452:Nwlaw63
398:Nwlaw63
393:Comment
166:WP refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
565:Delete
516:WP:GNG
419:bd2412
377:bd2412
320:(talk)
287:Jr8825
278:Delete
138:Google
96:delete
540:Socks
471:Defer
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
615:talk
607:Keep
598:talk
590:Keep
581:talk
556:talk
526:talk
512:Keep
483:talk
475:Keep
456:talk
441:talk
402:talk
370:Keep
361:talk
352:Keep
343:talk
304:Keep
293:Talk
266:talk
246:talk
226:talk
206:talk
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
58:talk
50:keep
594:jzp
437:TFD
412:Any
357:TFD
188:TWL
117:– (
617:)
600:)
558:)
548:is
485:)
458:)
443:)
404:)
363:)
345:)
290:•
284:.
268:)
260:.
248:)
240:.
228:)
220:.
208:)
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
56:|
613:(
596:(
554:(
528:)
524:(
481:(
454:(
439:(
426:T
400:(
384:T
359:(
341:(
337:.
264:(
244:(
224:(
204:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.