529:
348:) so fails to pass relevant N guideline WP:AUTHOR. He made TV serial but none is notable (at-least by WP standards) - fails WP:AUTHOR. He worked with Faruki - it does not matter here because WP:N is not inherited. You claim newspapers written about him. Provide some solid coverage here so that WP:N can be established. Sources in the BLP are not sufficient to establish WP:N and therefore this nom was made. --
387:"The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series)"
318:
He has directed one film and another one is on the way to be released. He made TV serials also. He worked with Faruki, another well known film maker in
Bangladesh. In film industry, Himel is a common face now. Newspapers written about him. Sources about him and his works, listed in the article, also
527:
Well, I think you should've googled a bit before telling this. It's the duty of the article creator, deletion proposer and all those people who're commenting here! When I googled I found that there's coverage about him. Also I previously mentioned, that you might need to think from the
Bangladeshi
192:
Film/TV directors/producers are not given an automatic free pass over WP:BIO just because they exist — their ability to qualify for
Knowledge articles is determined by criteria at WP:AUTHOR and producers/directors of non-notable films/ TV series is not something that would be expected to have an
210:
He is the prominent and young film director in
Bangladesh, Especially in Bengali movie and drama. He got recognition for his notable work. One movie directed by him got a huge response from the different area. He now works with his second movie with the Bangladeshi superstar
512:
First of all, there is no verification if the subject indeed produced or directed the TV series mentioned in this article so first we need to verify the claims. Second, I assume "television single dramas" are one episode dramas which are not notable unless they meet GNG.
478:
I see it too passes the notability test. So here comes the bigger unified question. Is this person really notable even after creating (OR playing a major role as assistant director) some really notable creative works? The answer is yes! So keep it.
469:
Now two question may arise. First one, are the television series(es) he directed notable? Answer is Yes, from the
Bangladesh media! As these are broadcasted in Bangladesh so you might need to think from that angle. Brief part of
193:
article on
English Knowledge. Search doesn't produce any coverage and substantial information in the independent RS about the person either so fails to meet basic GNG.. Therefore I can't see any significance..
161:
235:
As far I can see Ashraf ha produced only one notable film which is not sufficient to have a stand-alone entry on WP. What kind of recognition the subject received ? please cite some coverage here. --
415:
255:
528:
angle. Bangladesh is a country where the official language is Bangla! So maybe there's more coverage in Bangla. Anyway, I find the verifications in almost every famous
Bangladesh dailies.
458:
a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book,
414:
As far I can see the subject has produced only one notable film and I don't think we create bios on directors/producers who have produced just one film. A few recent exampls:
419:
295:
275:
155:
114:
400:
Here we can see, the person has to create a notable work (can be a film, book etc). Himel did the work. How can you claim it does not meet N guidelines?
121:
87:
82:
91:
17:
176:
74:
143:
474:
states that too. Therefore comes to the second question. Is the film reliable? Under the general criteria stated at
466:, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews
587:
651:
40:
137:
405:
324:
133:
647:
634:
607:
576:
557:
522:
496:
431:
409:
357:
328:
307:
287:
267:
244:
230:
202:
56:
36:
183:
630:
618:
572:
169:
564:
542:
507:
481:
401:
339:
320:
622:
78:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
646:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
567:, what do you mean, "is the film reliable?" We don't actually care if films are reliable. -
371:
223:
215:. Many of drama, directed by him on-air in national television and get positive responses.
518:
427:
353:
240:
198:
149:
626:
617:
per nomination, on account of subject lacking evidence based notability. Subject fails
602:
568:
302:
282:
262:
70:
62:
53:
108:
216:
212:
514:
423:
365:
349:
236:
194:
598:
345:
344:
Directed just one film so far - second movie not even begin production yet (
299:
279:
259:
532:. Now the second one. In the article I found that he actually directed 7
642:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
590:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
319:
shows his enough notability. So, I think, it should be kept.
416:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Ammad Azhar (2nd nomination)
256:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
104:
100:
96:
168:
596:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
420:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Gokul Ramakrishnan
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
654:). No further edits should be made to this page.
294:Note: This discussion has been included in the
274:Note: This discussion has been included in the
254:Note: This discussion has been included in the
296:list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions
276:list of Television-related deletion discussions
182:
8:
447:The number 3 criterion of WP:AUTHOR states
293:
273:
253:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
671:
454:or played a major role in
530:Anyway, you may look this
644:Please do not modify it.
635:09:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
621:. Inclusion certainly's
608:17:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
577:09:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
558:13:59, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
523:08:51, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
497:05:03, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
432:08:44, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
410:08:16, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
358:20:30, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
329:17:37, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
308:15:05, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
288:15:05, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
268:15:05, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
245:15:06, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
231:13:28, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
203:13:11, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
57:05:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
370:Lets check out what
610:
464:television series
310:
305:
290:
285:
270:
265:
228:
662:
606:
595:
593:
591:
554:
553:
550:
547:
536:, which are not
511:
493:
492:
489:
486:
467:
369:
343:
303:
283:
263:
226:
222:
219:
187:
186:
172:
124:
112:
94:
34:
670:
669:
665:
664:
663:
661:
660:
659:
658:
652:deletion review
611:
597:
586:
584:
551:
548:
545:
543:
505:
490:
487:
484:
482:
450:The person has
449:
363:
337:
304:◊distænt write◊
284:◊distænt write◊
264:◊distænt write◊
224:
217:
129:
120:
85:
69:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
668:
666:
657:
656:
638:
637:
594:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
562:
561:
560:
500:
499:
468:
448:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
332:
331:
312:
311:
291:
271:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
190:
189:
126:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
667:
655:
653:
649:
645:
640:
639:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
616:
613:
612:
609:
604:
600:
592:
589:
578:
574:
570:
566:
565:Pratyya Ghosh
563:
559:
556:
555:
539:
538:single dramas
535:
531:
526:
525:
524:
520:
516:
509:
508:Pratyya Ghosh
504:
503:
502:
501:
498:
495:
494:
477:
473:
465:
461:
457:
453:
446:
443:
442:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
412:
411:
407:
403:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
373:
367:
361:
360:
359:
355:
351:
347:
341:
340:Rafi Bin Tofa
336:
335:
334:
333:
330:
326:
322:
317:
314:
313:
309:
306:
301:
297:
292:
289:
286:
281:
277:
272:
269:
266:
261:
257:
252:
246:
242:
238:
234:
233:
232:
227:
220:
214:
209:
208:
207:
206:
205:
204:
200:
196:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
123:
119:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
643:
641:
619:WP:NDIRECTOR
614:
585:
541:
537:
533:
480:
475:
471:
463:
459:
455:
451:
444:
315:
191:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
117:
71:Himel Ashraf
63:Himel Ashraf
49:
47:
31:
28:
456:CO-CREATING
213:Shakib Khan
156:free images
623:WP:TOOSOON
648:talk page
627:The Gnome
603:talk page
569:The Gnome
472:WP:SERIAL
372:WP:AUTHOR
346:Priyotoma
218:NC Hasive
37:talk page
650:or in a
588:Relisted
115:View log
39:or in a
534:Serials
476:WP:FILM
452:CREATED
162:WP refs
150:scholar
88:protect
83:history
54:Spartaz
615:Delete
134:Google
92:delete
50:delete
515:Saqib
462:, or
424:Saqib
402:Rafi
374:says,
366:Saqib
350:Saqib
321:Rafi
237:Saqib
195:Saqib
177:JSTOR
138:books
122:Stats
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
631:talk
599:J04n
573:talk
540:. --
519:talk
460:film
445:Keep
428:talk
422:. --
406:talk
354:talk
325:talk
316:Keep
300:L3X1
280:L3X1
260:L3X1
241:talk
225:talk
199:talk
170:FENS
144:news
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
625:. -
184:TWL
113:– (
633:)
575:)
552:sh
549:ho
521:)
513:--
491:sh
488:ho
479:--
430:)
418:/
408:)
356:)
327:)
298:.
278:.
258:.
243:)
229:•
221:•
201:)
164:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
52:.
629:(
605:)
601:(
571:(
546:G
544:P
517:(
510::
506:@
485:G
483:P
426:(
404:(
368::
364:@
362:@
352:(
342::
338:@
323:(
239:(
197:(
188:)
180:·
174:·
166:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
136:(
128:(
125:)
118:·
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.