531:— due diligence is not being done when these tools are being used in this way. "Shoot them all and let the saps at AfD sort them out," is apparently the line of thinking. While I am personally sympathetic to the idea of a very high bar for so-called "Porn Bios," this blasting of 100 articles at the rate of 1 per minute, judging from the time logs, is not conducive to the spirit or practice of AfD. It is putting
378:. Redirecting non-notable articles to Listings of a subject which has been found to be non-notable is absurd. Playmate-hood, being inherently non-notable, does not prop up this article, nor can it prop up a List of playmates. Redirecting to non-notable lists only makes work for Admins who will have to delete these redirects later.
536:
sororities. The net result of these efforts was a lot of lost time by article creators and AfD participants and a lot of lost information from those articles annihilated as part of these campaigns. Meanwhile, the backlog of crap at New Pages festers. Something needs to be done about this problem. Mine is not a unique view — see
327:
I have to agree with
Damiens' analysis of the cited articles. Two of them are just mentions in laundry lists, with no significant biographical content, or other relevant content beyond the well-established and generic point that she was Miss ------ 2004. The third is not coverage at all, but a bit of
535:
ahead of the established article deletion process and is disrespectful both to the work of article creators and those of us who volunteer our time at AfD. We have seen similar automated mass annihilation efforts recently against modern
Trotskyist political organizations and against fraternities and
310:
The first is an article about playmates attending
Playboy's founder birthday party. The second is about how one of Playboy Racing Team's sponsors had four playmates at its booth on a trade show. The third is a Spanish three paragraphs article about how hot she is. Nothing of this is unexpected or
208:
is not an award: It's a strategic commercial decision made by
Playboy Corporation about how to better commercialize it products. Regardless of how much some Wikipedians love Playmates, we should write articles about them only when they were covered by independent third part sources. Also, texts
351:. Does not appear to be enough nontrivial reliably sourced content to justify an independent article. This has been the outcome of most recent AFD discussions for less prominent Playmates as well the way most recently named Playmates have been handled.
166:
527:- The use of automated tools for mass deletions should not be allowed against large blocks of articles which have already been patrolled at New Pages. It is, simply put, a violation of
370:
This should have been done after consensus determined
Playmate-hood's non-notability. Should sufficient sourcing and claim of notability later be found, the article can be re-started.
289:
What is with these blanked nominations? This is a clearly notable individual as the first
Japanese to become a playmate and it is also well sourced. A few examples of sourcing:
127:
197:
160:
419:
255:? She has four reported roles in the seven years since her Playmate selection, two as an uncredited (and unverified) extra, two unbilled trivial/generic roles.
399:
509:
396:
17:
348:
100:
95:
104:
356:
333:
260:
87:
181:
49:
462:. Granted, most of these should be redirected, but this one is just barely over the line to meet inclusion requirements.
532:
148:
569:
36:
290:
352:
329:
256:
61:
540:
at ANI. We need to keep them all as a matter of principle and ban the future use of automated tools in this way.
294:
568:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
513:
471:
142:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
554:
517:
496:
479:
454:
434:
411:
387:
360:
337:
322:
305:
281:
264:
246:
224:
138:
69:
54:
543:
This argument will be copied-and-pasted in the debate sections for all automated AfDs of this campaign.
301:
188:
328:
promotional fluff on an aggregation page with a large glamour photo and negligible factual content.
464:
383:
278:
174:
528:
239:
91:
446:
550:
492:
430:
407:
233:
Acting career appears to also be notable. Article just needs better references, not deletion.
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
537:
214:
154:
450:
316:
297:
218:
292:
379:
275:
538:
Knowledge (XXG):ANI#Massive_number_of_Playboy-related_AFD_nominations_by_a_single_user
234:
83:
75:
546:
488:
426:
403:
311:
outstanding, and happens for any girl that strips to
Playboy. This is the kind of
121:
445:
per Monty, BelloWello, and
Morbidthoughts' assessment of similar noms.
487:
to List of
Playboy Playmates of 2004. No significant coverage found.
562:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
117:
113:
109:
173:
213:are not the kind non-trivial coverage asked by the
187:
198:Being a Playboy playmate does not make you notable
274:as written above, it must be merged, not deleted
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
572:). No further edits should be made to this page.
296:, and that doesn't include those in Japanese.
8:
418:Note: This debate has been included in the
420:list of People-related deletion discussions
417:
395:Note: This debate has been added to the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
349:List of Playboy Playmates of 2004
315:I predicted on the nomination. --
1:
215:general notability guideline
589:
435:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
412:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
388:19:13, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
361:15:16, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
323:05:53, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
306:04:51, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
282:22:54, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
247:04:06, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
225:03:24, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
565:Please do not modify it.
209:solely related to their
32:Please do not modify it.
555:13:40, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
518:13:25, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
497:00:44, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
480:22:22, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
455:15:42, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
397:WikiProject Pornography
338:17:15, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
265:17:23, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
70:01:55, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
353:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
330:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
313:playmatehood coverage
257:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
202:Playmate of the Month
206:Playmate of the Year
279:User talk:Cavarrone
533:WP:I DON'T LIKE IT
44:The result was
545:
437:
423:
400:list of deletions
320:
244:
222:
50:non-admin closure
580:
567:
541:
478:
474:
467:
424:
414:
318:
240:
237:
220:
192:
191:
177:
125:
107:
68:
66:
59:
34:
588:
587:
583:
582:
581:
579:
578:
577:
576:
570:deletion review
563:
525:Procedural Keep
477:
472:
465:
463:
394:
243:
235:
200:. Being chosen
134:
98:
82:
79:
62:
55:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
586:
584:
575:
574:
558:
557:
521:
520:
510:212.137.70.194
504:as per Monty,
499:
482:
469:
466:coccyx bloccyx
457:
439:
438:
415:
391:
390:
364:
363:
342:
341:
340:
325:
284:
276:User:Cavarrone
269:
268:
267:
241:
195:
194:
131:
78:
73:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
585:
573:
571:
566:
560:
559:
556:
552:
548:
544:
539:
534:
530:
526:
523:
522:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
500:
498:
494:
490:
486:
483:
481:
476:
475:
468:
461:
458:
456:
452:
448:
444:
441:
440:
436:
432:
428:
421:
416:
413:
409:
405:
401:
398:
393:
392:
389:
385:
381:
377:
375:
369:
366:
365:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
343:
339:
335:
331:
326:
324:
321:
314:
309:
308:
307:
303:
299:
295:
293:
291:
288:
285:
283:
280:
277:
273:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
249:
248:
245:
238:
232:
229:
228:
227:
226:
223:
216:
212:
207:
203:
199:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
129:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
84:Hiromi Oshima
81:
80:
77:
76:Hiromi Oshima
74:
72:
71:
67:
65:
60:
58:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
564:
561:
542:
524:
505:
501:
484:
470:
459:
442:
373:
371:
367:
344:
312:
286:
271:
252:
251:What acting
230:
211:playmatehood
210:
205:
201:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
63:
56:
45:
43:
31:
28:
502:Keep or r/d
161:free images
298:BelloWello
529:WP:BEFORE
427:• Gene93k
404:• Gene93k
380:Dekkappai
485:Redirect
473:(toccyx)
376:redirect
345:Redirect
128:View log
57:Baseball
547:Carrite
489:Epbr123
317:Damiens
219:Damiens
167:WP refs
155:scholar
101:protect
96:history
64:Watcher
368:Delete
253:career
139:Google
105:delete
506:et al
447:SPNic
236:Monty
182:JSTOR
143:books
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
551:talk
514:talk
508:. --
493:talk
460:Keep
451:talk
443:Keep
431:talk
408:talk
384:talk
357:talk
334:talk
302:talk
287:Keep
272:Keep
261:talk
231:Keep
175:FENS
149:news
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
46:keep
374:NOT
372:Do
347:to
319:.rf
242:845
221:.rf
204:or
189:TWL
126:– (
48:. (
553:)
516:)
495:)
453:)
433:)
422:.
410:)
402:.
386:)
359:)
336:)
304:)
263:)
217:.
169:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
52:)
549:(
512:(
491:(
449:(
429:(
425:—
406:(
382:(
355:(
332:(
300:(
259:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
124:)
86:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.