433:. It starts with "This analysis merely compares the evidence reported in the canonical gospels to the extra Christian historical evidence we received, highlighting the inconsistencies" and ends with "The mixture of languages and the manipulation of the words translated, have been, in time, deliberately exploited to change the meaning." This is obviously an essay, and OR. Nothing to salvage here.
353:- The article undoubtedly presents itself as original research, but an editor with expertise in theology may be able to find sources for most (if not all) of the concrete assertions within. Though I do not have the available time to comb through the entire article, I saw at least two specific ideas that can be sourced with ease. The first is that of
413:
essay and is simply unsalvageable. Someone else, if and when an appropriate expert might be found, may at some point in the future want to write a WP article on this topic that has at least some semblance of compliance with
Knowledge (XXG) content policies, but it would have to be done totally from
548:-- This is no more than an essay and largely OR. It even declares itself not to be original research. If there was anything worth saving (and I do not think there is), it ought to be merged with something on the historicity of the new Testament generally.
335:
OR essay, POV pushing. There are certainly other articles which deal with the historical identities of the men reflected in the New
Testament, but this is not an encyclopedic treatment of the topic and there is no good way to make it so.
162:
362:
489:
there does not appear to be much here that wouldn't have to be totally rewritten. The title doesn't seem particularly helpful or accurate. If someone wants to salvage some of this discussion, perhaps adding a section to
196:
Original research. This is an original synthesis with no evidence at all that the opinions expressed come from anyone other than the author of the article. (PROD was removed by the author of the article.)
156:
90:
85:
117:
94:
264:
409:
No, thanks. There may be some ideas and assertions in this text that are correct and possibly verifiable but the article is written entirely as a lengthy and argumentative pure
77:
516:
122:
290:
358:
177:
144:
374:
557:
540:
523:
503:
481:
464:
447:
423:
402:
345:
327:
305:
279:
254:
230:
206:
59:
138:
17:
382:
249:
134:
226:
378:
81:
511:. Totally OR; hopelessly unencyclopedic essay with no reference to any of a wide body of literature on the subject (see e.g.
439:
184:
73:
65:
572:
36:
150:
357:, a detail central to the disagreements between catholicism and protestantism, is dealt with in vivid detail by
571:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
369:. Because AfD is not a place to hash out content problems, I propose that we consider recruiting an expert in
553:
354:
202:
512:
494:
that describes some of this material would be appropriate. Maybe merge some of it, but do not redirect.
477:
499:
244:
170:
549:
536:
443:
341:
520:
301:
275:
198:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
473:
495:
460:
419:
323:
239:
410:
315:
216:
220:
55:
532:
434:
414:
scratch. The current text is not salvageable and not improvable and must be deleted.
337:
297:
271:
111:
370:
456:
415:
319:
392:
50:
365:. The second is that of the Bariona-BarJona dubiosity, which appears in
491:
366:
565:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
107:
103:
99:
169:
183:
517:Historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles
265:list of Christianity-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
575:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
291:list of History-related deletion discussions
285:
259:
375:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Christianity
289:: This debate has been included in the
263:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
531:as per the detailed arguments above
383:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Theology
74:Historical veracity of the Apostles
66:Historical veracity of the Apostles
455:as essay and original research. --
379:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Saints
24:
558:00:06, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
60:16:53, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
1:
541:22:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
524:20:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
504:18:34, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
482:18:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
465:10:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
448:21:21, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
424:21:28, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
403:20:31, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
346:19:56, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
328:18:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
306:18:44, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
280:18:42, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
255:17:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
231:11:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
207:10:56, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
592:
361:--one of which dates back
385:) to bring it up to par.
568:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
513:The Bible and history
367:published literature
238:Original research.
44:The result was
359:many publications
308:
294:
282:
268:
583:
570:
401:
399:
295:
269:
252:
247:
242:
223:
188:
187:
173:
125:
115:
97:
34:
591:
590:
586:
585:
584:
582:
581:
580:
579:
573:deletion review
566:
393:
386:
355:Petros vs Petra
250:
245:
240:
229:
221:
130:
121:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
589:
587:
578:
577:
561:
560:
543:
526:
506:
484:
467:
450:
427:
426:
406:
405:
348:
330:
309:
283:
257:
233:
225:
191:
190:
127:
123:AfD statistics
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
588:
576:
574:
569:
563:
562:
559:
555:
551:
550:Peterkingiron
547:
544:
542:
538:
534:
530:
527:
525:
522:
518:
514:
510:
507:
505:
501:
497:
493:
488:
485:
483:
479:
475:
471:
468:
466:
462:
458:
454:
451:
449:
445:
441:
438:
437:
432:
429:
428:
425:
421:
417:
412:
408:
407:
404:
400:
398:
397:
391:
390:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
349:
347:
343:
339:
334:
331:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
310:
307:
303:
299:
292:
288:
284:
281:
277:
273:
266:
262:
258:
256:
253:
248:
243:
237:
234:
232:
228:
224:
218:
214:
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
195:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
124:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
567:
564:
545:
528:
508:
486:
469:
452:
435:
430:
395:
394:
388:
387:
350:
332:
311:
286:
260:
235:
212:
199:JamesBWatson
193:
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
474:John Carter
371:hagiography
157:free images
496:ErikHaugen
363:289 years
298:• Gene93k
272:• Gene93k
222:WikiDan61
533:Dreamspy
338:Jclemens
227:ReadMe!!
118:View log
521:Lambiam
472:as OR.
396:C M B J
381:and/or
351:Comment
314:, pure
163:WP refs
151:scholar
91:protect
86:history
546:Delete
529:Delete
519:). --
509:Delete
492:Gospel
487:Delete
470:Delete
453:Delete
440:Anselm
431:Delete
373:(from
333:Delete
312:Delete
236:Delete
213:Delete
194:Delete
135:Google
95:delete
46:delete
457:Yopie
416:Nsk92
411:WP:OR
320:Nsk92
316:WP:OR
217:WP:OR
215:Pure
178:JSTOR
139:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
48:. --
16:<
554:talk
537:talk
515:and
500:talk
478:talk
461:talk
444:talk
420:talk
342:talk
324:talk
302:talk
287:Note
276:talk
261:Note
203:talk
171:FENS
145:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
296:--
270:--
251:Dui
246:Mac
241:Ben
185:TWL
120:•
116:– (
556:)
539:)
502:)
480:)
463:)
446:)
436:St
422:)
389:—
377:,
344:)
326:)
318:.
304:)
293:.
278:)
267:.
219:.
205:)
165:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
552:(
535:(
498:(
476:(
459:(
442:(
418:(
340:(
322:(
300:(
274:(
201:(
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.