269:- I disagree. The history of championship belts is a standalone subject which is lacking on Knowledge (XXG). This is an area which will be expanded upon. Given the vast information online it is certainly not "pointless" to many people. The history of this specific title and it's various belt designs goes back decades with too much information to include in the separate WWE championship page (including belt creators, design details, material, debut dates, background history etc.). Many professional wrestling articles of a much smaller interest have
460:
championship belt that has represented multiple world championships throughout its history contested in various promotions. As far as the WWE Title goes, it spun off from NWA in 1963, it has represented the symbol of WWE since then, and it has undergone many name changes, title design (unlike the Big Gold Belt), unifications etc. There's clearly not enough material nor independent notability for its own separate article, due to the fact that the belt designs are part of the championship (the history of title holders is different).
327:
That is incorrect. 'The Big Gold Belt' for example has it's own page. If you believe it's redundant, then by definition of the word you believe it had meaning before. What changed this? Do you mean irrelevant? This seems to be leaning towards a POV. This article also covers all designs in the history
459:
Most of the sources that I deleted yesterday were clearly unreliable (am I saying that WWE.com is unreliable? never), because that's what I've done for a long time. As a nominator, I'm no longer going to edit this page. "The Big Gold" has its own article, since it's a historic professional wrestling
358:
article covers the designs well enough, but that's not to say that it can't be expanded into its own article if there is enough coverage that could talk about each design (the early designs may be a bit harder to find, unless their print sources have been uploaded online). In the meantime, I would
396:
The section does not go into nearly as much detail as the new article; hence it's creation and sourcing. There is simply too much information to cram into the WWE championship page without it looking bulky. Perhaps it would make sense to merge that section of the WWE championship page to this new
508:. The section at the article is enough. The material doesn't have sufficient independent notability for its own article. The belt designs are part and parcel of the championship, and unlike the history of title holders, it's not large enough to need to be spun out.
177:
480:
There are not sources to merit keeping it. Some sections don't even have sources. If you really want to the article, put it in your sandbox and edit it as you can. Otherwise it needs to be deleted.
103:
98:
107:
171:
90:
433:
WWE.com etc. is not "unreliable, unsourced content". Please refrain from insulting members and simply edit where you see appropriate if you believe there are "poorly written sentences" (POV).
307:
Hall of Fame in pro wrestling is radically different, but this is about the history of a championship belt design. We never create a separate articles for them, since it's redundant.
137:
244:
130:
525:
Not enough sources to merit keeping the article. It would take a long time to find enough sources to fufill the need for amount of sources it would require.
208:
I am nominating this article for deletion, because creating a separate article just for a title belt design is pointless. And it doesn't deserve neither a
192:
159:
608:
583:
566:
538:
517:
494:
473:
452:
425:
406:
389:
370:
344:
320:
300:
260:
237:
72:
359:
suggest to at least add the sources from this new pending article to the design section on the WWE Championship article, as it needs sources. --
153:
66:
149:
531:
487:
94:
17:
199:
221:
86:
78:
165:
448:
376:
That section covers the title design belt much better than this article as a whole, even if it has the half size of it.
296:
629:
40:
412:
Expanded with what? Unreliable, unsourced content and poorly written sentences. That's why this article is too big.
546:- per nomination. Original article not large enough for this to be a spin-off. Majority of sourcing is primary.
61:
436:
284:
625:
36:
213:
270:
209:
513:
185:
56:
53:
559:
604:
579:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
624:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
444:
402:
365:
355:
340:
292:
278:
217:
333:
329:
509:
463:
415:
379:
310:
250:
227:
547:
600:
594:
575:
124:
440:
398:
360:
336:
288:
274:
397:
page, since some information from there is now here (but expanded upon)?
618:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
354:- I'm a bit on the fence with this one. I feel that the current
574:- within-fictional-universe cruft. Yes, WWE is fiction.
120:
116:
112:
184:
198:
599:Everyone here knows that, no need to point it out.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
632:). No further edits should be made to this page.
245:list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions
328:of the championship, not just one design. No
8:
243:Note: This debate has been included in the
222:History of the WWE Championship belt design
87:History of the WWE Championship belt design
79:History of the WWE Championship belt design
434:
282:
242:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
220:article is at 41KB, as of now and
24:
1:
281:) 21:43, 19 May 2017 (UTC).
649:
330:valid grounds for deletion
621:Please do not modify it.
609:14:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
584:14:40, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
567:00:40, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
539:10:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
518:12:58, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
495:10:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
474:18:40, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
453:17:42, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
426:22:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
407:21:43, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
390:20:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
371:20:02, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
345:21:43, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
334:alternatives to deletion
321:19:41, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
301:19:33, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
261:19:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
238:19:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
73:04:15, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
273:(TNA Hall of Fame etc.)
455:
439:comment added by
332:nor any proposed
303:
287:comment added by
263:
640:
623:
598:
564:
558:
552:
537:
534:
529:
493:
490:
485:
469:
466:
421:
418:
385:
382:
368:
363:
356:WWE Championship
316:
313:
256:
253:
233:
230:
218:WWE Championship
203:
202:
188:
140:
128:
110:
69:
64:
59:
34:
648:
647:
643:
642:
641:
639:
638:
637:
636:
630:deletion review
619:
592:
560:
554:
548:
536:
533:I didn't do it!
532:
527:
526:
492:
489:I didn't do it!
488:
483:
482:
467:
464:
419:
416:
383:
380:
366:
361:
314:
311:
254:
251:
231:
228:
145:
136:
101:
85:
82:
67:
62:
57:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
646:
644:
635:
634:
614:
613:
612:
611:
587:
586:
569:
541:
530:
520:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
486:
431:
430:
429:
428:
393:
392:
349:
348:
324:
323:
206:
205:
142:
81:
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
645:
633:
631:
627:
622:
616:
615:
610:
606:
602:
596:
591:
590:
589:
588:
585:
581:
577:
573:
570:
568:
565:
563:
557:
553:
551:
545:
542:
540:
535:
524:
521:
519:
515:
511:
507:
504:
503:
496:
491:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
472:
471:
470:
458:
457:
456:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
427:
424:
423:
422:
411:
410:
408:
404:
400:
395:
394:
391:
388:
387:
386:
375:
374:
373:
372:
369:
364:
357:
353:
346:
342:
338:
335:
331:
326:
325:
322:
319:
318:
317:
306:
305:
304:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
262:
259:
258:
257:
246:
240:
239:
236:
235:
234:
223:
219:
215:
211:
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:Find sources:
143:
139:
135:
132:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
70:
65:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
620:
617:
571:
561:
555:
549:
543:
522:
505:
462:
461:
435:— Preceding
432:
414:
413:
378:
377:
351:
350:
309:
308:
283:— Preceding
266:
265:
249:
248:
241:
226:
225:
224:is at 27KB.
207:
195:
189:
181:
174:
168:
162:
156:
146:
133:
49:
47:
31:
28:
216:- the main
214:WP:SIZERULE
172:free images
271:WP:SPINOUT
210:WP:SPINOUT
626:talk page
510:oknazevad
37:talk page
628:or in a
601:★Trekker
528:Mr. C.C.
484:Mr. C.C.
449:contribs
437:unsigned
297:contribs
285:unsigned
131:View log
39:or in a
595:Bearian
576:Bearian
352:Neutral
178:WP refs
166:scholar
104:protect
99:history
54:King of
572:Delete
544:Delete
523:Delete
506:Delete
465:Nickag
441:Bbx118
417:Nickag
399:Bbx118
381:Nickag
362:JDC808
337:Bbx118
312:Nickag
289:Bbx118
275:Bbx118
267:Oppose
252:Nickag
229:Nickag
150:Google
108:delete
50:delete
550:Nikki
193:JSTOR
154:books
138:Stats
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
605:talk
580:talk
514:talk
445:talk
403:talk
341:talk
293:talk
279:talk
212:and
186:FENS
160:news
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
562:311
468:989
420:989
384:989
315:989
255:989
232:989
200:TWL
129:– (
52:.
607:)
582:)
516:)
451:)
447:•
409:.
405:)
343:)
299:)
295:•
247:.
180:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
71:♠
603:(
597::
593:@
578:(
556:♥
512:(
443:(
401:(
367:♫
347:.
339:(
291:(
277:(
204:)
196:·
190:·
182:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
152:(
144:(
141:)
134:·
127:)
89:(
68:♣
63:♦
58:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.