267:: Notability isn't an issue for 1-2 article freelance writers. If their work is published by a reliable, fact-checking source, then their experience, or lack thereof, is completely irrelevant. Should they make a mistake, the editorial team is expected to correct it. Knowledge (XXG) doesn't judge each writer separately unless the site's own reliablility is called into question; as far as I know, this is not the case with Eurogamer
502:) less than a couple of weeks ago which already has more than 3 millions visits, I guess such a number has some weight about showing his popularity, and probably more important, it proves he’s not just notorious as a video game commentor. If the article is currently weak, it should be simply be improved rather than deleted or even merged. —
195:
Alright, call me an idiot, but I really think we ought to attempt to establish what the guideline is on these commentators. Artosis and tasteless, two more famous people (at least in korea) don't have articles, mainly because I decided that they probably didn't have enough coverage, as most of it was
478:
article. The content seems to address a trend, of which Husky just happens to be an example. The sources are about video game commentating and the people who do it, they're not really about Mike Lamond. If we have an article about video game commentating, that would be the ideal place to have this
312:
Regarding the sources, I agree with Jimmy. The sources overall are considered reliable because they have editorial oversight on the content, include that by freelancers. But again, the sources mainly deal with just his role as a commentator. So even if they are reliable, they don't paint a broad
330:
content. Since this internet casting is a relatively new phenomenon at least in North
America, perhaps it would be worthwhile to establish a separate page about game casting and relay Husky's article there. There is already a page established for pro-gamers
196:
sort of like the coverage below. I know that there are a couple interviews, but the question becomes, is this really significant independent sourcing? This is a neutral AfD. It needs to be determined what the interpretation of GNG is for esports commentators.
531:
Hey this guy is a shameless self promoter and even mentioned his damn wikipedia page in a cast he did. I really think this should be up for deletion when there are far more important figures in the greater SC2 community who do not have pages.
249:
looks fine to. I see no reason to delete. However in the spirit of establishing precedent the sources should really scrutinized, looking at both the URL and the author, as it seems like freelancer writers sneak in on these sorts of articles.
326:: I also see no deciding factor in the sources themselves that can adjudicate a deletion. To my knowledge, the only other roles that Husky has are to organize tournaments (with pro gamers) and upkeep a popular website dealing with
553:
I agree to the person above. There are also far more important people involved in gaming in general that do not have their own page, rightfully so. Clogging Wiki with material that is by no means encyclopedic is vandalism imo.
164:
387:
298:
for this person. Given that this person is really only know for commentary for the StarCraft series, I'd think that this is not enough for a biography. I don't see any problem mentioning him in
120:
245:, so I'm satisfied there. The YouTube channel is definitely a situational source, but is fine for what it's used for (also it's his official channel, so that has some merit). The
425:
158:
413:
362:. This article utilizes multiple independent reliable sources that help establish enough notability for an article. Perhaps not in its state a day ago:
335:
where many popular gamers are found in its sub sections. However, that page would not be suitable for Husky's article since it is concerned with
93:
88:
97:
246:
204:
443:
80:
539:
555:
340:
332:
179:
58:
17:
146:
291:
431:
419:
218:
474:
I don't have an objection to the content, as it is sufficiently sourced. However, the content makes for an extremely weak
140:
230:
521:
36:
136:
563:
547:
506:
488:
465:
402:
377:
352:
317:
280:
259:
238:
208:
62:
398:
520:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
276:
186:
84:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
295:
125:
559:
543:
307:
535:
497:
484:
54:
479:
content. All the other commentators who have sources but lack notability could also be mentioned there.
503:
437:
394:
336:
198:
152:
272:
172:
76:
68:
500:
299:
48:. Obviously discussion about the possibility of a merge could continue on the article talk page.
480:
461:
348:
314:
255:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
371:
499:(which can even be bought on iTunes, by the way, which’s revenue will be given to charity
366:
237:
for NPR, and not a writer. I'd like to see established notability here as well. The
457:
344:
327:
251:
242:
222:
114:
221:, though published on Eurogamer features a freelance writer who's only written
225:
for
Eurogamer. Notability would have to be established for this source. His
234:
303:
496:, set aside of his StarCraft II commenting, he also published a parody song
302:, similar to how some of the more prominent competitors are mentioned in
339:
and mostly Korean content. However, Husky is mentioned in the section
294:
doesn't give much explicit information regarding this, but I'd go with
365:, but after completely rewriting the article within Knowledge (XXG)'s
226:
514:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
369:, I don't see why this article should be deleted or redirected.
388:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
450:
363:
110:
106:
102:
171:
185:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
524:). No further edits should be made to this page.
414:list of video game related deletion discussions
8:
382:
442:
412:: This debate has been included in the
386:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
341:participation outside of South Korea
292:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people)
448:
24:
436:
229:page may shed some light. The
1:
489:01:41, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
466:00:16, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
430:
403:00:22, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
378:23:13, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
353:22:04, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
318:18:59, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
281:16:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
260:14:07, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
209:08:16, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
564:04:54, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
548:11:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
507:04:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
424:
63:06:38, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
418:
579:
241:is written by the site's
517:Please do not modify it.
313:picture of notability. (
32:Please do not modify it.
308:Super Smash Bros. Melee
367:notability guidelines
337:Starcraft: Brood War
247:ART Tecnhica article
77:Husky (commentator)
69:Husky (commentator)
300:StarCraft (series)
215:Keep & Comment
44:The result was
538:comment added by
468:
405:
391:
61:
570:
550:
519:
455:
454:
453:
446:
440:
434:
428:
422:
408:
392:
374:
239:PC Gamer article
190:
189:
175:
128:
118:
100:
52:
34:
578:
577:
573:
572:
571:
569:
568:
567:
533:
528:
522:deletion review
515:
504:MetalGearLiquid
472:Merge somewhere
449:
417:
395:Jclemens-public
372:
235:by a programmer
207:
199:NativeForeigner
132:
124:
91:
75:
72:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
576:
574:
530:
527:
526:
510:
509:
491:
469:
406:
380:
357:
356:
355:
311:
296:WP:ENTERTAINER
285:
284:
283:
273:JimmyBlackwing
203:
193:
192:
129:
126:Afd statistics
71:
66:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
575:
566:
565:
561:
557:
551:
549:
545:
541:
540:108.28.118.76
537:
525:
523:
518:
512:
511:
508:
505:
501:
498:
495:
492:
490:
486:
482:
477:
473:
470:
467:
463:
459:
452:
445:
439:
433:
427:
421:
415:
411:
407:
404:
400:
396:
389:
385:
381:
379:
376:
375:
368:
364:
361:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
329:
325:
322:
321:
319:
316:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
263:
262:
261:
257:
253:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
213:
212:
211:
210:
206:
201:
200:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
127:
122:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:
70:
67:
65:
64:
60:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
556:92.252.86.97
552:
534:— Preceding
529:
516:
513:
493:
481:Ham Pastrami
476:biographical
475:
471:
409:
383:
370:
359:
343:. Thoughts?
328:Starcraft II
323:
315:Guyinblack25
287:
268:
264:
214:
197:
194:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
50:Bigtimepeace
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
233:is written
231:NPR article
223:one article
159:free images
373:Artichoker
458:• Gene93k
304:StarCraft
219:final ref
536:unsigned
288:Redirect
227:about me
205:Contribs
121:View log
59:contribs
324:Comment
265:Comment
252:Teancum
165:WP refs
153:scholar
94:protect
89:history
243:editor
217:- the
137:Google
98:delete
271:NPR.
180:JSTOR
141:books
123:) •
115:views
107:watch
103:links
16:<
560:talk
544:talk
494:Keep
485:talk
462:talk
451:Talk
410:Note
399:talk
384:Note
360:Keep
349:talk
333:here
306:and
277:talk
256:talk
173:FENS
147:news
111:logs
85:talk
81:edit
55:talk
416:. (
393:--
345:*Cc
187:TWL
119:– (
57:|
562:)
546:)
487:)
464:)
456:)
444:RS
401:)
390:.
351:)
320:)
290::
279:)
269:or
258:)
250:--
167:)
113:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
87:|
83:|
53:|
558:(
542:(
483:(
460:(
447:·
441:·
438:S
435:·
432:B
429:·
426:N
423:·
420:G
397:(
347:(
310:.
275:(
254:(
202:/
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
117:)
79:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.