385:- if the average NFC East rivalry is akin to Lennon vs. McCartney, the NFC South is about on par with two high school bands arguing over who gets the closing set in a battle of the bands - that said, the teams share a certain geographical proximity; they play in the same conference; and given that the South divisions are "new" conferences (mostly made up of the leftovers when the NFL went from 5/5/5 East/Central/West to the current 4/4/4/4 East/North/West/South structure), I'd say it's reasonably notable, especially owing to the way NFL schedules are formed - intradivisional games are basically de-facto rivalries in much the same fashion that college football "end of year" matchups are.
276:, and I see this as opening the door to declare that all intradivisional rivalries should have their own article. Each NFL team plays the other three teams in its division at least twice a year, at home and away. The parent article also has the rivalries of Falcons-Saints, Panthers-Saints, Panthers-Bucs, along with several examples of a "signature moment" for each one (my feeling is that the definition of a signature moment is that it is the one that typifies the rivalry in general, but then again, I feel that few teams have more than one bitter rival). Do an article called
183:
84:
273:
144:
177:
79:
403:
rivalry". It's not
Cowboys-Redskins, or even Patriots-Colts. It'd be much better served as a brief subsection within a broader-scoped parent article
255:. I think the term is not able enough, and the coverage deep enough. The article needs more work, but that's not a reason for deletion. --
395:
Upon re-evaluation, I largely agree with
Mandsford - there simply isn't a lot of history here, and what results is the NFL version of "
17:
253:
111:
106:
431:
414:
364:
331:
319:
I don't see any evidence that either the
Atlanta Falcons or the Carolina Panthers consider each other to be significant rivals
310:
289:
264:
237:
223:
115:
63:
198:
98:
165:
446:
280:
if you must, but there aren't very many that are classic matchups, regardless of how much hype Fox Sports might give.
36:
427:
445:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
320:
56:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
159:
322:, let alone the NFL. The question is not whether the phrase is used, but whether the rivalry is notable.
410:
390:
362:
380:
277:
155:
423:
260:
205:
327:
285:
191:
49:
343:
248:
406:
400:
386:
355:
306:
102:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
396:
298:
256:
171:
323:
281:
219:
302:
94:
69:
132:
246:
422:
per reliable sources with substantial coverage. A rename is worth considering.
245:
I think there's enough references out there to be found. A cursory check found
250:
215:
348:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
439:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
274:
Intradivisional rivalries in the
National Football Conference
252:, and there's possibly hundreds, if not thousands, more
139:
128:
124:
120:
190:
353:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
204:
85:
Articles for deletion/I-85 Rivalry (2nd nomination)
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
449:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
214:I don't think this is a notable rivaly.
77:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
76:
80:Articles for deletion/I-85 Rivalry
24:
236:, his otters and a clue-bat •
393:) 05:02, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1:
432:18:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
415:05:11, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
365:03:32, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
332:21:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
311:19:16, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
290:20:53, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
265:15:27, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
238:12:05, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
224:07:10, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
64:22:13, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
466:
442:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
297:- meets notability per
75:AfDs for this article:
272:This is a spinoff of
381:NFC South rivalries
278:NFC South rivalries
232:Almost no sources.
44:The result was
401:Toronto Blue Jays
367:
457:
444:
397:New York Yankees
358:
352:
350:
346:
235:
234:Ten Pound Hammer
209:
208:
194:
142:
136:
118:
59:
34:
465:
464:
460:
459:
458:
456:
455:
454:
453:
447:deletion review
440:
424:ChildofMidnight
356:
344:
341:
233:
151:
138:
109:
93:
90:
73:
57:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
463:
461:
452:
451:
435:
434:
417:
369:
368:
351:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
314:
313:
292:
267:
240:
212:
211:
148:
89:
88:
87:
82:
74:
72:
67:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
462:
450:
448:
443:
437:
436:
433:
429:
425:
421:
418:
416:
412:
408:
404:
402:
398:
392:
388:
384:
382:
376:
375:
371:
370:
366:
363:
360:
359:
349:
347:
340:
339:
333:
329:
325:
321:
318:
317:
316:
315:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
293:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
268:
266:
262:
258:
254:
251:
249:
247:
244:
241:
239:
231:
228:
227:
226:
225:
221:
217:
207:
203:
200:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
157:
154:
153:Find sources:
149:
146:
141:
134:
130:
126:
122:
117:
113:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
91:
86:
83:
81:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
60:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
441:
438:
419:
407:Badger Drink
394:
387:Badger Drink
379:Redirect to
378:
373:
372:
357:Juliancolton
354:
342:
301:'s sources.
294:
269:
242:
229:
213:
201:
195:
187:
180:
174:
168:
162:
152:
95:I-85 Rivalry
70:I-85 Rivalry
54:
50:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
383:or somesuch
377:changed to
178:free images
299:Hammersoft
257:Hammersoft
374:Weak keep
324:Mandsford
282:Mandsford
345:Relisted
145:View log
303:Rlendog
184:WP refs
172:scholar
112:protect
107:history
270:Delete
230:Delete
156:Google
140:delete
116:delete
199:JSTOR
160:books
143:) – (
133:views
125:watch
121:links
16:<
428:talk
420:Keep
411:talk
391:talk
328:talk
307:talk
295:Keep
286:talk
261:talk
243:Keep
220:talk
192:FENS
166:news
129:logs
103:talk
99:edit
58:Talk
216:BUC
206:TWL
430:)
413:)
405:.
399:/
361:|
330:)
309:)
288:)
263:)
222:)
186:)
131:|
127:|
123:|
119:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
51:NW
48:.
426:(
409:(
389:(
326:(
305:(
284:(
259:(
218:(
210:)
202:·
196:·
188:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
158:(
150:(
147:)
137:(
135:)
97:(
61:)
55:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.