337:. The general consensus of authors and reviewers of their conferences is that they organize only good conferences and some of them are actually excellent conferences (rank A); many of their keynote speakers are top scientists from well known universities such as MIT, ETH-Zurich, etc. Frequently they co-operate with or are technically co-sponsored by ACM, AAAI, IEEE and other prestigious international associations. Furthermore, most of their conferences publish proceedings at SCITEPRESS and post-conference best papers with Springer LNAI, LNBIP, LNCS, CCIS, and others.
203:
This has been around for a few years but it still does not have any reliable references other than its own. There are many fake organisations around which arrange scam conferences and provide vanity publishing for papers that wouldn't pass peer review. I make no suggestion that this is one such
408:. The article lacks independent sources that indicate notability and I have not been able to locate any significant coverage. Editing history is mostly a list of single purpose accounts (as are the "do not deletes" here), suggesting this is merely self-promotional/COI.
369:. INSTICC organized conferences follow a double-blind review process with the help of international program committees, usually with more than 20 countries represented and an "oral papers" acceptance rate of around 40%.
172:
226:
266:
125:
246:
166:
320:. No independent reliable sources found after searching. They are fairly well known for sending spam emails but that doesn't contribute to notability. --
132:
351:
338:
321:
390:
376:
398:
359:
17:
436:
40:
187:
98:
93:
154:
102:
325:
85:
355:
342:
394:
380:
372:
148:
432:
36:
52:
The anonymous IP comments assert notability sufficiently to avoid speedy deletion in accordance with
144:
180:
417:
384:
346:
329:
308:
289:
278:
258:
238:
218:
89:
67:
62:
56:, but that is a different standard of notability than we consider in deletion discussions here. ~
194:
274:
254:
234:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
431:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
81:
73:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
53:
413:
304:
160:
57:
204:
company, but at present from the information provided I cannot tell whether this is
270:
250:
230:
212:
119:
409:
292:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
300:
425:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
115:
111:
107:
179:
299:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
193:
227:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
439:). No further edits should be made to this page.
267:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
8:
265:Note: This debate has been included in the
247:list of Science-related deletion discussions
245:Note: This debate has been included in the
225:Note: This debate has been included in the
264:
244:
224:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
456:
418:12:52, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
385:08:14, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
347:23:35, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
330:14:57, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
309:02:47, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
68:18:34, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
279:13:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
259:13:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
239:13:50, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
219:13:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
428:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
399:few or no other edits
360:few or no other edits
401:outside this topic.
362:outside this topic.
402:
375:comment added by
363:
311:
281:
261:
241:
66:
447:
430:
388:
387:
349:
298:
294:
217:
198:
197:
183:
135:
123:
105:
60:
48:The result was
34:
455:
454:
450:
449:
448:
446:
445:
444:
443:
437:deletion review
426:
370:
287:
209:
140:
131:
96:
80:
77:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
453:
451:
442:
441:
421:
420:
403:
364:
352:85.244.136.210
339:85.244.136.210
332:
322:101.119.14.170
314:
313:
312:
296:
295:
284:
283:
282:
262:
242:
201:
200:
137:
76:
71:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
452:
440:
438:
434:
429:
423:
422:
419:
415:
411:
407:
404:
400:
396:
392:
391:85.246.20.147
386:
382:
378:
377:85.246.20.147
374:
368:
367:Do not Delete
365:
361:
357:
353:
348:
344:
340:
336:
335:Do not Delete
333:
331:
327:
323:
319:
316:
315:
310:
306:
302:
297:
293:
291:
286:
285:
280:
276:
272:
268:
263:
260:
256:
252:
248:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
215:
214:
207:
196:
192:
189:
186:
182:
178:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
146:
143:
142:Find sources:
138:
134:
130:
127:
121:
117:
113:
109:
104:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:
75:
72:
70:
69:
64:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
427:
424:
405:
371:— Preceding
366:
334:
317:
288:
211:
210:
205:
202:
190:
184:
176:
169:
163:
157:
151:
141:
128:
49:
47:
31:
28:
397:) has made
358:) has made
167:free images
433:talk page
271:• Gene93k
251:• Gene93k
231:• Gene93k
208:or fraud
206:bona fide
54:WP:CSD#A7
37:talk page
435:or in a
373:unsigned
290:Relisted
126:View log
58:Amatulić
39:or in a
410:Peacock
213:Velella
173:WP refs
161:scholar
99:protect
94:history
82:INSTICC
74:INSTICC
50:delete.
406:Delete
318:Delete
145:Google
103:delete
188:JSTOR
149:books
133:Stats
120:views
112:watch
108:links
16:<
414:talk
395:talk
381:talk
356:talk
343:talk
326:talk
305:talk
275:talk
255:talk
235:talk
181:FENS
155:news
116:logs
90:talk
86:edit
63:talk
301:Mz7
195:TWL
124:– (
416:)
389:—
383:)
350:—
345:)
328:)
307:)
277:)
269:.
257:)
249:.
237:)
229:.
175:)
118:|
114:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
412:(
393:(
379:(
354:(
341:(
324:(
303:(
273:(
253:(
233:(
199:)
191:·
185:·
177:·
170:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
147:(
139:(
136:)
129:·
122:)
84:(
65:)
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.