Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/ICall - Knowledge

Source 📝

314:
I see two brief reviews,both in extremely reliable sources. It would be better if they had been full reviews, but I'm inclined to think that what David Pogue covers in the NYTimes is notable enough for an article
167: 398: 375: 352: 122: 161: 454:-- and improve. Even when you filter for false positives, there appear to be plenty more articles about this company/product in Google News search. 302: 127: 198:
Very sketchy coverage in reliable sources (several mentions, one sketchy review, no in-depth coverage). Also the software is likely a
17: 182: 149: 482: 95: 90: 40: 99: 298: 207: 277: 82: 334:
per DGG; it may not be too unique but it's at least been covered to the point that I'd consider notable.
478: 438: 203: 36: 273: 143: 459: 238: 175: 139: 339: 294: 86: 463: 442: 412: 390: 367: 343: 326: 306: 281: 211: 64: 408: 386: 363: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
477:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
189: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
434: 423: 78: 70: 455: 261: 254: 232: 220: 199: 55: 335: 322: 404: 382: 359: 228: 155: 116: 267:
Article meets all WP standards for corporate articles and should not be deleted.
426:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
317: 219:
I am the article author. Article is about a corporation and follows
253:"Companies reported as significant subjects of news coverage are 471:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
244:
Coverage source audiences are both National and Regional.
112: 108: 104: 174: 433:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 485:). No further edits should be made to this page. 399:list of Business-related deletion discussions 376:list of Software-related deletion discussions 353:list of Internet-related deletion discussions 188: 8: 397:Note: This debate has been included in the 374:Note: This debate has been included in the 351:Note: This debate has been included in the 396: 373: 350: 247:Coverage sources are independent of corp. 7: 237:Coverage depth of the three refs is 24: 250:Coverage is not self-promotion. 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 255:usually sufficiently notable 502: 413:19:18, 28 April 2012 (UTC) 391:17:58, 27 April 2012 (UTC) 368:17:58, 27 April 2012 (UTC) 327:01:57, 27 April 2012 (UTC) 307:22:19, 26 April 2012 (UTC) 282:21:13, 26 April 2012 (UTC) 260:Article is written from a 212:20:07, 26 April 2012 (UTC) 202:. I doubt it is notable. 474:Please do not modify it. 65:05:56, 12 May 2012 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 464:11:14, 9 May 2012 (UTC) 443:00:15, 4 May 2012 (UTC) 344:00:02, 1 May 2012 (UTC) 262:neutral point of view 227:Coverage sources are 239:beyond mere mentions 293:per nom. SPAM. -- 48:The result was 445: 415: 402: 393: 379: 370: 356: 63: 493: 476: 432: 428: 403: 380: 357: 221:these guidelines 193: 192: 178: 130: 120: 102: 62: 60: 53: 34: 501: 500: 496: 495: 494: 492: 491: 490: 489: 483:deletion review 472: 421: 200:run-of-the-mill 135: 126: 93: 77: 74: 56: 54: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 499: 497: 488: 487: 467: 466: 448: 447: 446: 430: 429: 418: 417: 416: 394: 371: 347: 346: 329: 309: 287: 286: 285: 284: 265: 264: 258: 251: 248: 245: 242: 235: 215: 214: 196: 195: 132: 73: 68: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 498: 486: 484: 480: 475: 469: 468: 465: 461: 457: 453: 450: 449: 444: 440: 436: 431: 427: 425: 420: 419: 414: 410: 406: 400: 395: 392: 388: 384: 377: 372: 369: 365: 361: 354: 349: 348: 345: 341: 337: 333: 330: 328: 324: 320: 319: 313: 310: 308: 304: 300: 296: 295:Alan Liefting 292: 289: 288: 283: 279: 275: 272: 271: 270: 269: 268: 263: 259: 256: 252: 249: 246: 243: 240: 236: 234: 230: 226: 225: 224: 222: 218: 213: 209: 205: 204:Artem Karimov 201: 191: 187: 184: 181: 177: 173: 169: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137:Find sources: 133: 129: 124: 118: 114: 110: 106: 101: 97: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 75: 72: 69: 67: 66: 61: 59: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 473: 470: 451: 422: 331: 316: 311: 290: 274:Chatterboxer 266: 216: 197: 185: 179: 171: 164: 158: 152: 146: 136: 57: 49: 47: 31: 28: 435:Ron Ritzman 162:free images 58:Sandstein 479:talk page 456:Yakushima 405:• Gene93k 332:Weak Keep 312:Weak Keep 233:secondary 37:talk page 481:or in a 424:Relisted 336:Ducknish 303:contribs 229:reliable 123:View log 39:or in a 383:Frankie 360:Frankie 168:WP refs 156:scholar 96:protect 91:history 291:Delete 140:Google 100:delete 323:talk 183:JSTOR 144:books 128:Stats 117:views 109:watch 105:links 79:ICall 71:ICall 16:< 460:talk 452:Keep 439:talk 409:talk 387:talk 364:talk 340:talk 299:talk 278:talk 231:and 217:Keep 208:talk 176:FENS 150:news 113:logs 87:talk 83:edit 50:keep 318:DGG 190:TWL 125:• 121:– ( 462:) 441:) 411:) 401:. 389:) 381:— 378:. 366:) 358:— 355:. 342:) 325:) 305:) 301:- 280:) 223:: 210:) 170:) 115:| 111:| 107:| 103:| 98:| 94:| 89:| 85:| 52:. 458:( 437:( 407:( 385:( 362:( 338:( 321:( 297:( 276:( 257:" 241:. 206:( 194:) 186:· 180:· 172:· 165:· 159:· 153:· 147:· 142:( 134:( 131:) 119:) 81:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
 Sandstein 
05:56, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
ICall
ICall
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
run-of-the-mill
Artem Karimov
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.